Unvaccinated have better protection through natural immunity

[Revmitchell]

new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that two doses of the mRNA vaccines increased the risk of COVID-19 infection during the omicron wave.…..


…….The study found three doses of the Pfizer vaccine increased immunity, but natural immunity persisted longer.


Study: COVID vax INCREASES risk of infection

Study: COVID vax INCREASES risk of infection

 

[Deacon]

It is a curious game the media plays when they write articles concerning public health.
The goal of an author is “views”; how many people can I get to view my article.
The more views, the better for the writer.
Media is no longer interested in accuracy, their aim isn’t even to teach their audience. It’s the “clicks” they want.

What is even more concerning is how those who viewed the post (particularly those who “liked” the above post) interpret the article.

This is not an anti-vac article. The article simply confirms what we already knew. Those that have had a disease have better immunity than those that had a simple vaccination against a disease.

Simply stated, those that survive the virus have better immunity to the virus than those that have been vaccinated.
The purpose of a vaccination is to minimize the health risks by reducing the number of people getting the disease.

Weigh the risks. Take your chances.

Rob

 

[Revmitchell]

Wait, so who said it was an anti tax article?

 

[Wingman68]

I like how Deacon demeans those who agree with or like the OP, classy. The OP doesn’t even talk about ALL the negatives associated with taking the vaccine, lucky for the argument for actually taking the vaccine. 70% of Americans are now refusing to continue taking further shots, so the ones that do are going to find a steeper hill to climb while trying to make this sale going forward.
This story addresses depopulation, there are other considerations as well, such as heart problems, blood clotting, etc. etc. Variants always diminish in severity. This is known.
There will have to be a new ‘virus’ that will spring forth, maybe from a lab that is being ‘sheltered’ in some location, like ah, Ukraine or something, if they want to continue to control through fear & injecting their new horror on the people because this one is done, imo. I heard hemorrhagic fever was just diagnosed in a couple of unrelated people in Africa, stay tuned.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• “Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda,” produced by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Children’s Health Defense, details the World Health Organization’s intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used — without people’s knowledge or consent — since the mid-'90s
• The WHO has been caught more than once deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized
• The film clearly illustrates the depopulation agenda is not a conspiracy theory. It’s reality, and it’s happening worldwide. The HPV vaccine and the COVID shots also have adverse impacts on fertility that are being ignored
• In the decade after the rollout of the HPV vaccine, the teen pregnancy rate dropped by 50%
• While VAERS is the only publicly available system to assess COVID jab injuries, the U.S. government has at least 10 other reporting systems they’re not sharing data from. Children’s Health Defense is filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of harms, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance companies around the world also confirm this

 

[asterisktom]

What is even more concerning is how those who viewed the post (particularly those who “liked” the above post) interpret the article.

Also concerning is the mind-reading that often goes on n these boards. I :"liked" the article for most of the points raised, not all. (Aside from the fact that what we have forced on us now is not really a vaccine at all.)

Those who totally agree, which I do not, could then choose "winner".

 

[Wingman68]

Also concerning is the mind-reading that often goes on n these boards. I :"liked" the article for most of the points raised, not all. (Aside from the fact that what we have forced on us now is not really a vaccine at all.)

Those who totally agree, which I do not, could then choose "winner".

Or they could choose winner just because it’s a statement to said reply.