1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

God No One Has Seen At Any Time

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by SavedByGrace, Feb 15, 2024.

  1. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    God No One Has Seen At Any Time

    “Θεὸν οὐδεὶς ἑώρακεν πώποτε μονογενὴς Θεὸς ὁ ὢν εἰς τὸν κόλπον τοῦ Πατρὸς, ἐκεῖνος ἐξηγήσατο” (John 1:18)

    “God no one hath ever seen; the Unique God, who is always close to the Father; He has revealed”

    This verse is used by some as “proof”, that Jesus Christ cannot be “God”. It is argued, that John is clear here, that no one has ever seen God. Is this correct?

    Reading this verse shows this to be wrong. Here we have in the oldest and best textual evidence, dating from the early 2nd century, even in the Gospel of John used by the early heretics. There is no doubt that the Apostle John wrote, “Θεὸν...μονογενὴς Θεὸς”. It should also be noted, that in both places, the noun, “Θεὸς”, is used without the definite Greek article “τὸν Θεόν...Θεὸς”, as John does in 1:1, “καὶ Θεὸς ἦν ὁ Λόγος” (and the Word was God). Do we translate John 1:18 as, “god no one has ever seen...the Unique god”? No!

    It is very clear from John 1:18, that John is here speaking of the Father, who has never been seen, as “Θεὸν”, is here “τοῦ Πατρὸς” (the Father), Whom Jesus is always close to. In John 6:46, Jesus makes this very clear: “Not that anyone has seen the Father, except he who is from God. He has seen the Father”. Jesus here speaks of His eternal existence with God the Father, as we see the same Greek “ὢν”, as in 1:18, which is in the present, continuous tense. Also Jesus says that He is “from God” the Father, which is the preposition, “παρα”, that is, “besides, alongside”.

    In Exodus chapter 33, we read, “and Yahweh said to Moses...You cannot see My face; for no man shall see Me, and live” (verses 17, 20). Yet, in verse 11 it says, “So Yahweh spoke to Moses Face to face, as a man speaks to his friend”. “pānîm ’el-pānîm”, can also mean, “Person to person”. It is clear that Yahweh here is Speaking directly to Moses, as do friends with each other. The detailed description shows that it is not a dream or vision. In verse 9 we read, “the pillar of cloud descended and stood at the door of the tabernacle”, and 10, “All the people saw the pillar of cloud standing at the tabernacle door, and all the people rose and worshiped, each man in his tent door”. Yahweh was in this Pillar of cloud, Whom Moses saw. In Deuteronomy 34:10, we read, “No prophet has arisen again in Israel like Moses, whom Yahweh knew Face to face (pānîm ’el-pānîm)”. It is clear from Exodus 33, that there are TWO Persons Who are Yahweh. The One Who meets Moses “Face to face”, as do humans when they meet each other; and the Other, Who says that no one can ever see His Face and live! The One is Jesus Christ, and the Other, The Father. There is no other explanation for this passage.

    In Genesis 32, we read, “Jacob was left alone, and a Man wrestled with him until daybreak” (verse 24). This “Man” Who Jacob wrestled with, was actually “physically” with him. In verse 30, Jacob says, “Jacob then named the place Peniel, For I have seen God Face to face (’ĕlōhîm pānîm ’el-pānîm), he said, and I have been delivered”. Jacob is clear that the “Man”, Whom he wrestled with, is none other than Almighty God.

    In Numbers 14:14, “They will tell it to the inhabitants of this land. They have heard that You, Lord, are among these people, how You, Yahweh, are seen Face to face (‘ayin bə‘ayin, Eye to eye), how Your cloud stands over them, and how You go before them in a pillar of cloud by day and in a pillar of fire by night”

    Deuteronomy 5:4, “Yahweh spoke to you Face to face (pānîm ’el-pānîm) from the fire on the mountain”

    All these Encounters are without doubt, directly with Almighty God Himself. Who is Yahweh. As this cannot be the Father, it can only be the pre-Incarnational Appearances of the Lord Jesus Christ, known as Theophanies, or Christophanies.

    We also have the actual Visit from Yahweh to Abraham, in Genesis chapters 17-19, were we read of Yahweh having his “feet washed”, “eating food”, and “walking with Abraham”; all of which shows that this was not a “dream or vision”, but Yahweh actually with Abraham and Sarah.

    In the 6th chapter in the Book of Judges, where we have “The Angel of Yahweh (Mal'âk Ye hôvâh)”, Visit Gideon. In verse 12 we read, “Then the Angel of Yahweh Appeared to him and said: “Yahweh is with you, mighty warrior”. Here “The Angel of Yahweh”, Speaks of Another Who is “Yahweh”. In verse 14 it says, “Yahweh looked (pânâh, to face) upon him and said”, showing “physical” contact. Gideon addresses “The Angel”, “Please, Lord (, the Name used for God), how can I deliver Israel?” (verse 15). Note that “Lord” here is, “’Aḏōnāy”, and not, “’ăḏōnê”. Clearly Gideon knows who this Mal'âk Ye hôvâh is. In the next verse, the Angel replies, “But I will be with you, the Lord said to him”. Here “LORD” is “Ye hôvâh”, Who is The Angel of Ye hôvâh! “I will be”, is in the Hebrew, “hâyâh”, which is the same in Exodus 3:14, “I AM”. Here we have The Angel of Yahweh, Who is also Yahweh, who says to Gideon, “I Am with you”. Language that is impossible for any created being to use! In verse 22 Gideon says, “When Gideon realized that He was the Angel of the Lord, he said, Oh no, Lord God (literally, ’Aḏōnāy Ye hôvâh) I have seen the Angel of the Lord Face to face (pānîm ’el-pānîm)”. Gideon is assured by Yahweh Himself, “But Yahweh said to him, Peace to you. Don’t be afraid, for you will not die” (verse 23). If this Angel of Yahweh, were a created angel, then Yahweh would not have told Gideon, “Don’t be afraid, for you will not die”, as only those who see God Face to face, will die! Nothing can be clearer from this passage in Judges, that The Angel of Yahweh, Who is clearly distinct from Yahweh, and Himself Yahweh, is The Lord Jesus Christ.

    In Malachi 3:1, there is a Prophecy of the First Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.

    “See, I am going to send My messenger, and he will clear the Way before Me. Then the Lord you seek will suddenly come to His temple, the Messenger of the Covenant you desire—see, He is Coming,” says Yahweh of Hosts”

    This is a very interesting verse. The Speaker here is “Yahweh of Hosts”. The first “messenger” is to clear the Way for Him, “he will clear the Way before Me”. We then have “hā 'Adônây” (The Lord, not, “Adôn”, Who is here “Mal'âk be rı̂yth” (The Messenger of the Covenant). This “Messenger” is also Coming.

    In the Gospels (Matthew 11:10, etc), Jesus Christ quotes from the verse, but makes a change to the personal pronoun. Instead of “Me (μου)”, we have “You (σου). By doing so, Jesus here makes Himself the Speaker in Malachi 3:1, Who is “Yahweh of Hosts”, and He says that John the Baptist, went before Him, to prepare His Way, and that Her is “The Messenger of the Covenant”. This is one of the strongest Testimonies by Jesus Christ, to His own Absolute Deity, as “Yahweh of Hosts”. Nothing else can account for the change of the pronoun by Jesus! Matthew 3:3, etc, with Isaiah 40:3, confirms the Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, as the Coming of Yahweh/Elohim.

    Jesus Christ clearly identifies Himself as “The Messenger of Yahweh”, in the Old Testament, Who is Himself also Yahweh. Those who still argue that there is only One Person in the Bible, Who is Yahweh, and that this is the Father, are proven to be wrong from the Bible! There is no escaping the facts as taught in the Bible, that BOTH Jesus Christ, and the Father are Yahweh, but not the same Person. The Person Who Spoke with Moses FACE TO FACE, and Who is the “Man” Who Appeared to Gideon, is Yahweh. Yet we are also told that no human can see God and live. We have seen that this refers ONLY to God the Father.
     
  2. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    John 1:18 . . . ο μονογενης υιος . . . .
    John 8:56.
    John 14:6-9.
    Colossians 1:15.

    Dr. Wilbur N. Pickering translation note: 'Instead of “the only begotten son” (as in over 99.5% of the Greek manuscripts), some five manuscripts (of inferior quality, objectively so) have “an only begotten god,” while another two (also inferior) have “the only begotten god”. Since the absence of the definite article (in Greek) can have the effect of emphasizing the inherent quality of the noun, the second reading could be rendered “only begotten god”—this alternative has appealed to many evangelicals who see in it a strong affirmation of the deity of Christ. But if the God-part of the Christ was begotten in the womb of the virgin Mary, then He is not eternally pre-existent; and in that event Christ couldn’t be God the Son, one of the three persons of the Trinity. Notice the precision in Isaiah 9:6—“unto us a child is born; unto us a son is given.” Jehovah the Son was given, not born. But in any case, why follow seven manuscripts of demonstrably inferior quality against 1,700? The original and therefore true reading is certainly “the only begotten Son”.'
     
    #2 37818, Feb 15, 2024
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2024
  3. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Wilbur Pickering Vs the Textual Evidence


    “θεὸς” (God), instead of “υιος” (Son), is the oldest, and has wider textual evidence. Of the Greek manuscripts, we have: The Codices P66 (about 200 A.D. some date as early as AD 100), P75 (early 3rd cent.), Sinaticus (4th), Vaticanus (4th), Ephraemi (5th). Earlier than this, we have this reading “θεὸς” in, Ignatius (died 110), Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons (130-200), Clement of Alexandria (150-215), and The Diatessaron, (about 150). We also have the testimony of the early “heretics”, like Valentinus of Egypt (2nd cent), Origen (185-254), Arius of Alexandria (250-336), who read “θεὸς” in John 1:18, and not “υιος”. The evidence for “υιος”, is also very early, and also known to Irenaeus, Clement and Origen. The earliest Greek manuscript is the 5th century Codex Alexandrinus, over 200 years after the P66. In more recent times, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, in both their Kingdom Greek Interlinears, use “θεὸς” in the text, but render it as “god”, because of their theology. This is followed in their New World Translation. It should be noted, in both uses “Θεὸν, θεὸς” in 1:18, there is no article in the Greek (τὸν θεόν, θεὸς), so there is no grammatical argument for the second use to be translated as “god”, other than the fact that it refers to Jesus Christ, and the JW’s theology rejects His full Deity! The Unitarian New Testament by Dr Noyes, also has “God”. So, even those opposed to the Bible’s Teaching that Jesus Christ IS “God”, in this verse accept the correct reading as “θεὸς”.
     
  4. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    27,436
    Likes Received:
    1,047
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Has no one ever seen God? Are the three Persons of the Trinity able to see, comprehend, know the other two Persons? Of course. But has any human or created being ever see God the Father, in His totality? Apparently not!!

    Certainly our understanding of each of the Three Persons is limited and flawed, but we have beheld God the Son incarnate, and He has explained God the Father to us, so we have seen a glimpse of both through His word and witnesses.
     
    #4 Van, Feb 15, 2024
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2024
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Alan Gross

    Alan Gross Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    458
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Again, ANDREW ANSELL had some thoughts on this.

    :Whistling
    ...

    Good stuff to play around, at:
    Jesus as Θεός (God): A Textual Examination.
    (can scroll down to John 1:18).

    "Note: For a less academic treatment of this article
    go to Jesus as “God”: Scriptural Fact or Scribal Fantasy?"

    ...

    Cool manuscripts list at this answer to:
    Should John 1:18 read "the only begotten God"?
    ...

    & I like this info and answer on the two titles, in this O.P.,
    that the NT gives to Jesus, namely, "first and last"
    (Rev 1:17, 18, 22:13)
    and "I Am", (Matt 14:27, Mark 6:50, etc.)
    along with the idea that Jesus is the source of life.

    Was the phrase ζωὴν ἐν ἑαυτῷ in John 5:26
    related to the Tetragrammaton
    as well as the ὁ ζῶν in Revelation 1:17?


     
    #5 Alan Gross, Feb 15, 2024
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2024
  6. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Pickering gave the evidence.

    ο μονογενης υιος 1700 mss
    ο μονογενης θεος 2 mss
    μονογενης θεος 5 mss
     
    #6 37818, Feb 15, 2024
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2024
  7. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you have found my personal study website, that is good to know :Biggrin:Cool
     
  8. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When we are to consider any "textual evidence" for readings, we are not limited to what the manuscripts alone say, we have to take into account the ancient Bible Versions, like the Old Latin, made from the Greek which dates from the 2nd century AD. Then, we also have the quotations in the writings of the Church Fathers.

    A good example is 1 John 5:7, the oldest Greek manuscripts date from the 16th century. However, the words were quoted by Tertullian and Cyprian, both from the Latin Church in North Africa, who used the Old Latin and Greek New Testrament, in the 3rd century AD. It is also known to Augustine and Jerome, again in Latin, but both knew Greek.

    At least two important Church Councils quote the words

    The Dedication Creed, Council of Antioch, 341 AD

    “And in One Lord Jesus Christ, His Son, Only-begotten God, by whom all are things” (Kidd, p.31, From the Council of Antioch, 341, ap. Ath. De Synodis, 23 (Op. n. 587 sq. ; P.G. xxvi. 721)

    Council of Chalcedon, 451

    “one Person and one subsistence, not as if Christ were parted or divided into two Persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God, Word, Lord, Jesus Christ” (Kidd, p. 299; The Definition of the Faith, October 22, 451 From the Council of Chalcedon, Actio V., ap. Mansi, vii. 1 1 6 sq)

    Both of these important Church Councils, which had many hundreds of both Greek and Latin attendees, chose the reading “ μονογενὴς θεός”, which they would have found in their Gospel of John.

    We also see that the early heretics, knew of this reading, who certainly would have said if the reading, "μονογενὴς θεὸς", were not genuine.

    Valentinus, 100-180 AD, according to Irenaeus and Clement
    Heracleon a Gnostic, about 125
    Ptolemy, disciple of Valentinus, about 180
    Theodotus of Byzantium late 2nd cent, according to Clement
    Origen of Alexandria (185-254)
    Arius of Alexandria (250-336) according to Epiphanius

    The early dates are important, which is what is important here, even if their "theology" is heretical.

    As is the Unitarian New Testament by Dr Noyes, which also has “God”. So, even those opposed to the Bible’s Teaching that Jesus Christ IS “God”, in this verse accept the correct reading as “θεὸς”
     
  9. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well let us see. Either the inerrant word of God is found 1700 or so manuscripts. Or in only 7 manuscripts which disagree on the "the" 2 to 5. 1702 are wrong and only 5 are right.

    Most of the Trinitarians were wrong and the Gnostics were right after all.
     
  10. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    obviously you don't know much about textual criticism!

    what difference does even 10,000 manuscripts make, if their original from which they are COPIED, is WRONG??? You fail to understand that even these manuscripts were COPIED by mere men, and NOT men "Inspired" by God the Holy Spirit!

    The OLDEST Greek manuscripts read GOD, the very early Greek Church Fathers read GOD. The Old Latin Version made from the Greek New Testament, reads GOD. Even those who deny that Jesus Christ is GOD, acknowledge it reads GOD!

    Let me give you a free lesson in textual criticism. Look at Colossians 2:2, the ending. The MAJORITY of Greek manuscripts do NOT support the accepted reading in the MAJORITY of English and other language, modern Bible Versions:

    "of God's mystery, that is, Christ Himself" - NASB
    "of God's mystery, which is Christ" - ESV
    "of God's mystery--Christ" - HCSB
    the mystery of God, namely, Christ - NIV
    "of God's secret plan, which is Christ himself" - NLT

    etc, etc, ALL of these readings are paraphrases of what the Greek actually reads, which is, "τοῦ θεοῦ Χριστοῦ", literally, "The God Christ"

    When this reading was accepted Westcott and Hort, and then the Revised Version of 1885, the ONLY textual evidence that support it, was ONE Greek manuscript, the Codex Vaticanus of the FOURTH century, and ONE LATIN Church Father, Hilary, also of the same time! Since this time, ONE more Greek manuscript has been added for this reading, the Papyri P46, and Pelagius, a fourth century HERETIC, who was also LATIN, and another, Ps-Jerome, along with a FEW LATIN manuscripts!

    we here have just TWO Greek manuscripts!!!

    The KJV reads, "of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ"

    The NKJV, "of the mystery of God, both of the Father and of Christ"

    Both have MORE Greek manuscript evidence, but of much later dates!

    There are FOURTEEN variant readings for the end of this verse!

    Now lets hear your comments on how textual criticism actually does work!
     
  11. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    At issue is the identity of God's word. [Humanistic] Textual Criticism versus Biblical Textual Scholarship.
    Which approach uses collation to identify the original reading.
    http://grace-ebooks.com/library/Wilbur Pickering/Identity of the New Testament Text IV copy.pdf
     
  12. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    an interview of Wilbur N. Pickering
     
  13. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
  14. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
  15. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
  16. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I know for a fact the "Son" reading is God's word in said text.
     
  17. SavedByGrace

    SavedByGrace Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2020
    Messages:
    10,332
    Likes Received:
    446
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Your so called "fact" is FICTION!
     
  18. 37818

    37818 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Messages:
    16,584
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Faith:
    Baptist
    An only begotten God, of which there is no such thing. Psalms 90:2, . . . from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God. And Isaiah 45:18, For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. John 1:3, Colossians 1:16-17.
     
Loading...