Featured $4 Billion Corp. To Indiana: We Warned You About RFRA, Now We're 'Forced To Dramatica

:thumbsup::laugh::laugh:

 

He is mad again.

 

Leave it to the left wing to be mad about religious liberty. Then they argue about it based on money... and they say conservatives put money above principles.:tonofbricks:

 

I don't like laws like this. Too close to the stuff that was done to Blacks back during Jim Crow. Why on earth does a state want to revisit that?

This just isn't something I think Christians need to be too happy about. I would hate to be a Christian in Indiana right now because this law again, the way it's being shown to have had an overwhelming amount of support from the majority of people in the state, seems quite detrimental to the cause of Christ.

This is just a bad look.

 

I don't get it. Why do the state courts need the same guidance if there is a federal law?

 

Such as?

How so?

 

The Clintons passed the federal law but the courts said that it did not apply to the states so Obama passed a state law in Illinois.

One drawback to this legislation is that it gives Democrats a monopoly hold on baking cakes for sodomite weddings as special bakeries catering to gay weddings and planned parenthood abortion mills, etc., with Democrat owners are expected to be in all the gay neighborhoods.