1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

4 charged in phone scheme at US senator's office

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Crabtownboy, Jan 27, 2010.

  1. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    17,402
    Ratings:
    +637
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not very smart. How many years could he get for this crime?


     
  2. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Ratings:
    +0
    From the linked article - "All four were charged with entering federal property under false pretenses for the purpose of committing a felony, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine."
     
  3. Paul3144

    Paul3144 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Ratings:
    +0
    That's the maximum. They probably won't get nearly that much.
     
  4. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Ratings:
    +182
    See, this is exactly what happens to godless liberals. They go out and break the law...


    ....oh wait...
     
  5. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    17,402
    Ratings:
    +637
    Faith:
    Baptist

    :laugh: Good one.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,794
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We don't know yet what felony they were "intending" to commit.
     
  7. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Ratings:
    +0
    I suspect that the article is way off on what was happening.

    The article says that they were there to tamper with the phone lines. No doubt the reporters are jumping to that conclusion based on how they were dressed.

    The article says that ccording to an FBI affidavit, O'Keefe was already sitting in the waiting area and recorded the men on his cell phone camera when they walked in.

    O'Keefe is the guy that got ACORN on tape with their misdeeds.

    I am guessing that there was something that he wanted to get on camera that would have involved some sort of interaction between his three actors dressed as telephone repairmen and the Senator's staff.

    Time will tell.
     
  8. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,149
    Ratings:
    +2,371
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That is exactly what happened
     
  9. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,644
    Ratings:
    +27
    Faith:
    Baptist
    At the most, it's a matter of criminal mishief, which is almost never punished by jail time unless it's paired with some other violations which aren't applicable here.

    If he were found guilty, the most he would get is a small fine.
     
  10. Aaron

    Aaron Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,867
    Ratings:
    +603
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's about time someone fought fire with fire. Civility against Marxism will lose every time.
     
  11. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,297
    Ratings:
    +35
    ...
    On reflection, I could have used a different approach to this investigation, particularly given the sensitivities that people understandably have about security in a federal building. The sole intent of our investigation was to determine whether or not Senator Landrieu was purposely trying to avoid constituents who were calling to register their views to her as their Senator. We video taped the entire visit, the government has those tapes, and I’m eager for them to be released because they refute the false claims being repeated by much of the mainstream media.
    It has been amazing to witness the journalistic malpractice committed by many of the organizations covering this story. MSNBC falsely claimed that I violated a non-existent “gag order.” The Associated Press incorrectly reported that I “broke in” to an office which is open to the public. The Washington Post has now had to print corrections in two stories on me. And these are just a few examples of inaccurate and false reporting. The public will judge whether reporters who can’t get their facts straight have the credibility to question my integrity as a journalist.


    http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/
     
  12. JohnDeereFan

    JohnDeereFan Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2009
    Messages:
    4,644
    Ratings:
    +27
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm not a big fan of the "fire with fire" approach. I prefer the "wise as serpents, gentle as doves" approach.

    By doing this, even if O'Keefe is right and even if his investigation shows what he claims it does, he's surrendered a lot of credibility and has caused a lot of people to not take him seriously now.
     
  13. rbell

    rbell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    11,103
    Ratings:
    +0
    I wonder...if these folks are exonerated in any way, ya'll reckon CTB will print a retraction?


    Yeah. Me either.
     
  14. windcatcher

    windcatcher New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,764
    Ratings:
    +0
    There used to be a name for incredible jounalizm which used to unemploy reporters unless they worked for The Star or The Enquirer.......... yellow journalizm...... where the truth gets twisted...... like 'tamper' becomes 'tap', and the focus of 'why the Senator is not receiving her phone calls' gets changed to 'bugging her office'..... when no such thing occurred. And relativism excapes reality like making an appeal to emotional charged event like 'Watergate' (when this isn't in the same league) and then generalizing it to characterize and discredit a broad group of people (in this case labeled 'conservatives') who had no rule over the behavior of a few... hardly famous people who made their own independent choices.
     
Loading...