In commenting about the UAW strike against auto makers, a concern was mentioned about a 40% reduction in the number of autoworkers if the USA transitions to BEV's.
Now we definitely know where some of the anti-BEV propaganda is coming from. On one hand, we are told BEV's are two expensive for ordinary people to buy. But BEV's cost about $10,000 more than similar fossil fueled vehicles.
Question, why do BEV's cost more with far fewer parts and subsystems and labor. Lets say a BEV battery costs about $165 per KW-h and they need 90 KW-hs of battery to needed range, 300 miles plus. That works out to about $15,000 for the battery. And since the actual much simpler vehicle should cost say 25% less, then the cost differential should be less than $5,000. Easily recovered in a few years of operating cost savings.
In summary, a nice fossil fuel car should be about $40,000 and a nice BEV should be about $45,000.
Now we definitely know where some of the anti-BEV propaganda is coming from. On one hand, we are told BEV's are two expensive for ordinary people to buy. But BEV's cost about $10,000 more than similar fossil fueled vehicles.
Question, why do BEV's cost more with far fewer parts and subsystems and labor. Lets say a BEV battery costs about $165 per KW-h and they need 90 KW-hs of battery to needed range, 300 miles plus. That works out to about $15,000 for the battery. And since the actual much simpler vehicle should cost say 25% less, then the cost differential should be less than $5,000. Easily recovered in a few years of operating cost savings.
In summary, a nice fossil fuel car should be about $40,000 and a nice BEV should be about $45,000.
.