-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A very, very interesting 33 minutes
- Thread starter percho
- Start date
In '91, I read a book by David Lifton, Best Evidence: Disguise and Deception in the Assassination of John F. Kennedy. It's now a permanent item in my library.
Lifton graduated from Cornell with a degree in physics, and was working on a degree in engineering at UCLA when the Zapruder Film was released. To him, the head snap sealed the deal that Kennedy was (also) shot from the front.
Interestingly, Lifton passed away just this month on St. Nicholas Feast Day (Dec. 6).
His friend at the time, a professor of law at UCLA, invited him to make his case to his law students. After a presentation of detailed and scientific evidence, and considering it with the entire body of evidence at their disposal, the law students all came down on the side of the Warren Report.
Lifton was flabbergasted. He wrote:
That launched him on the quest to trace the chain of custody of the body, and interview those who handled it. The Dallas doctors' descriptions differed dramatically from those in the autopsy report. The only logical conclusion, assuming each set of witnesses were truthful, is that the President's body was altered on Air Force One en route from Dallas to Bethesda.
Lifton graduated from Cornell with a degree in physics, and was working on a degree in engineering at UCLA when the Zapruder Film was released. To him, the head snap sealed the deal that Kennedy was (also) shot from the front.
Interestingly, Lifton passed away just this month on St. Nicholas Feast Day (Dec. 6).
His friend at the time, a professor of law at UCLA, invited him to make his case to his law students. After a presentation of detailed and scientific evidence, and considering it with the entire body of evidence at their disposal, the law students all came down on the side of the Warren Report.
Lifton was flabbergasted. He wrote:
Arguing with the students and listening to them deliberate, I soon realized an investigation did not have to be an organized conspiracy to start with the Warren Commission's evidence and come to its conclusions. All that was needed were lawyers.
But his friend took him aside, and told him that his students were also considering the doctrine of best evidence. What is more reliable, the evidence offered from a grad student's analysis of a 2D film, or the autopsy report, written by those who examined and handled the body of the President?
That launched him on the quest to trace the chain of custody of the body, and interview those who handled it. The Dallas doctors' descriptions differed dramatically from those in the autopsy report. The only logical conclusion, assuming each set of witnesses were truthful, is that the President's body was altered on Air Force One en route from Dallas to Bethesda.
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
In 1992, Congress passed the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act. That act mandated full disclosure of all documents by 2017, 54 years after JFK was killed. The last administration promised to comply fully with that law. But under intense pressure from CIA Director Mike Pompeo, withheld, in the end, thousands of pages of CIA documents.
Today, this afternoon, the Biden administration did exactly the same thing. That would be thousands of pages of documents after nearly 60 years, after the death of every single person involved. But we still can't see them. Clearly, it's not to protect any person. They're all dead. It's to protect an institution. But why?
Well, today we decided to find out. We spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden CIA documents, a person who was deeply familiar with what they contained. We asked this person directly, "Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an American President? And here's the reply we received verbatim. Quote, "The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake."
TUCKER CARLSON: Here's what a source said about the CIA and JFK's assassination
Today, this afternoon, the Biden administration did exactly the same thing. That would be thousands of pages of documents after nearly 60 years, after the death of every single person involved. But we still can't see them. Clearly, it's not to protect any person. They're all dead. It's to protect an institution. But why?
Well, today we decided to find out. We spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden CIA documents, a person who was deeply familiar with what they contained. We asked this person directly, "Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F. Kennedy, an American President? And here's the reply we received verbatim. Quote, "The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake."
TUCKER CARLSON: Here's what a source said about the CIA and JFK's assassination
RighteousnessTemperance&
Well-Known Member
This guy's presentation and Tucker's piece and the timing are all a bit suspicious.
Since the JFK Collections Act dates back to 1992, there were a great many opportunities to present the public with all, or at least nearly all, of the information.
Certainly the Obama admin could have finished the job. But Clinton’s and Bush’s also both had 8 years to get it done. However, none of them are mentioned.
Since the JFK Collections Act dates back to 1992, there were a great many opportunities to present the public with all, or at least nearly all, of the information.
Certainly the Obama admin could have finished the job. But Clinton’s and Bush’s also both had 8 years to get it done. However, none of them are mentioned.