1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Allegoricalism

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Jordan Kurecki, Mar 7, 2018.

  1. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    104
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The following is excerpted from the latest edition of the Advanced Bible Studies Series course Understanding Bible Prophecy, which is available from Way of Life Literature.
    _________

    The “normal-literal” method of Bible interpretation refers to the manner in which human language is ordinarily interpreted.

    We use figures of speech, such as metaphors, in normal speech, but we understand that these are figures of speech by the context and we know how to interpret them. If I say, “I’m going for a run,” we know that this means that I am literally going to go running. But if I say, “I’m going to run down to the store,” we know this is a figure of speech, and it simply means that I am going to the store, whether by walking, driving, etc.

    The same is true for Bible prophecy. It contains figures of speech, but the Bible makes it clear that these are figures of speech and teaches us how to interpret them either by the context itself or by comparing Scripture with Scripture.

    Dr. David L. Cooper wisely observes: “When the plain sense of Scripture makes common sense, seek no other sense, but take every word at its literal meaning unless the facts of the immediate context clearly indicate otherwise.”

    Contrast the allegorical method of interpretation

    The allegorical method interprets the prophetic portions of Scripture in a symbolic manner rather than a literal one. By this method, the Old Testament prophecies of Israel’s glorious earthly kingdom are interpreted as descriptions of the church age. So “Sion” is the church and “the thousand years” of Revelation 20 are the church age and the desert blossoming as the rose (Isa. 35:1) is fruitfulness in the church age.

    Consider three examples:

    The Geneva Bible note at Revelation 9:11 identifies “the Angel of the bottomless pit” as “Antichrist the Pope, king of hypocrites and Satan’s ambassador.” There is no reason, though, to see this angel as anything other than a literal fallen angel in a literal bottomless pit.

    Adam Clarke on Revelation 20:2: “In what this binding of Satan consists, who can tell? ... it is not likely that the number, a thousand years, is to be taken literally here.”

    Jamieson, Fausset, Brown on Revelation 20:2: “Thousand symbolizes that the world is perfectly leavened and pervaded by the divine; since thousand is ten, the number of the world, raised to the third power, three being the number of God.”

     
  2. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    104
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The history of allegoricalism

    First century believers did not interpret the prophecies allegorically. The allegorical interpretation was invented by false teachers after the time of the apostles.

    A school was established at Alexandria, Egypt, which became the headquarters for the allegorical method of interpretation. Egypt was a place where false teaching proliferated in the early centuries after Christ.

    Clement headed the school from 190 to 202. He corrupted the Christian faith by mixing it with the worldly philosophy of Plato. He taught many false doctrines, including purgatory, and believed that most men would eventually be saved even though Jesus said only a few would be (Mt. 7:14).

    Origen (A.D. 185-254) was one of the chief fathers of allegoricalism. He said, “The Scriptures have little use to those who understand them literally.” He described the literal meaning of Scripture as “bread” and encouraged the student to go beyond this to the “wine” of allegoricalism, whereby one can become intoxicated and transported to heavenly realms. Origen’s commentaries contained a mass of fanciful interpretations, abounding in “heretical revisals of Scripture” (Frederick Nolan, Inquiry into the Integrity of the Greek Vulgate, p. 367). Origen led the school at Alexandria from 202 to 232. Though he endured persecution and torture for the cause of Christ under the emperor Decius in 250, Origen held many false teachings. Like Clement, he mixed the truth of the Bible with pagan philosophy. Following are some of his heresies: He taught baptismal regeneration, purgatory, the pre-existence of the human soul, and universalism (with even the devil eventually being saved). He taught that the Holy Spirit was the first creature made by God and denied that Jesus is fully God. He did not believe that the Scriptures are wholly inspired by God. He taught that celibacy is a holy state above marriage.

    The Roman Catholic Church interpreted Bible prophecy allegorically throughout its history.

    The Protestant denominations (e.g., Anglican, Presbyterian, Lutheran, Methodist) have also interpreted prophecy allegorically, with few exceptions. This is one of the errors they brought out of Rome.

    Why we interpret the prophecies literally

    First, God gave the Scriptures to REVEAL truth to man, not to hide it. See Deuteronomy 29:29. Prophecy is given to reveal secrets, not hide them. Prophecy is light, not darkness (2 Pe.1:19). The Bible’s final book of prophecy, Revelation, is so named because it is given to reveal truth, not hide it. Prophecy is to be understood in the normal way that human language is understood because it is God’s revelation to mankind in human language. God made human language, and He has communicated His revelation to man in normal human language that is interpreted in a normal way that language is interpreted.

    Second, the apostles interpreted prophecy literally.

    Consider two key passages:

    Acts 3:18-21 - Peter preached that as there was a literal fulfillment of Christ’s first coming to suffer for man’s sin, so there will be a literal fulfillment of the prophecies pertaining to Israel’s conversion and kingdom. The heaven will receive Christ until He returns. Then there will be a “restitution of of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets.” Words could not be plainer. The prophecies of Israel’s regathering and conversion and blessing and the prophecies of Christ sitting on David’s throne will be literally fulfilled.

    Romans 11:25-27 - Paul also taught that God’s covenants with Israel will be literally fulfilled. Israel is currently blind, except for those few, like Peter and Paul, who are saved. Israel will be blind onlyuntil the fulness of the Gentiles is come in, referring to the church age. Then Israel will be saved and her covenants fulfilled. Again, words could not be plainer.

    That the apostles and the apostolic churches interpreted prophecy literally is admitted by most church historians.

    “The early Church for 300 years looked for the imminent return of our Lord to reign, and they were right” (William Newell, Revelation).

    Even Augustine, “the father of amillennialism,” admitted that there were many in his day [fifth century] who believed in a literal fulfillment of Revelation 20. He said, “I myself, too, once held this opinion. ... They who do believe them are called by the spiritual, Chiliasts, which we may literally reproduce by the name Millenarians” (Augustine, City of God, book 20, chapter 7).

    The church at Antioch continued to interpret prophecy literally after the allegorical method was invented by heretics such as Origen (185-254). Antioch, of course, was an important church founded by Barnabas and Paul, and it is from this church that the first foreign missionaries were sent out (Acts 11:19-26; 13:1-4; 15:39-41). It was at Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians. Some of the preachers associated with Antioch were Lucian (died 312), Diodorus of Tarsus (d. 390), Chrysostom (d. 407), Theodore (d. 428), and Theodoret (d. 458). These men did not accept the Alexandrian allegorical method of interpretation. They interpreted Bible prophecy literally. Farrar says, “Diodorus of Tarsus’ books were devoted to an exposition of Scripture in its literal sense, and he wrote a treatise, now unhappily lost, ‘on the difference between allegory and spiritual insight’” (F. W. Farrar, History of Interpretation, pp. 213-15).
     
  3. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    104
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Third, Bible prophecies have always been fulfilled literally.

    Prophecies about Israel were fulfilled literally.

    Israel’s entire history was given in the great prophecy of Deuteronomy 28 (see particularly verses 63-67). This prophecy describes Israel’s defeat at the hands of foreign powers and her dispersion to the ends of the earth, and they have been fulfilled literally and precisely over the past 2,000 years, beginning with the Babylonian Captivity and then Rome’s destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 and again in AD 135.

    Prophecies of the nations were fulfilled literally.

    The prophecies of the nations by Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel were so precise that scoffers have said that they must have been written after the events.

    TYRE
    Consider the prophecy of the ancient city of Tyre in Ezekiel 26:3-16. Tyre was the capital of the great Phoenician Empire. The city consisted of two parts. One part of the city was on the coast and another part was on an island about a half mile off the coast. It was one of the most beautiful cities of ancient times.
    - Nebuchadnezzar will besiege and sack Tyre (Eze. 26:7-11). In 573 BC, Nebuchadnezzar conquered Tyre after a 13-year siege. At that time the coastal city was destroyed, but the city on the island was not conquered.
    - Many nations will participate in destroying Tyre (Eze. 26:3). Tyre was attacked and overcome by the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Greeks, the Syrians, the Romans, and finally the Muslims.
    - Tyre’s walls and towers will be destroyed (Eze. 26:4). This was done first by Nebuchadnezzar and then by Alexander the Great.
    - The city will be made flat like the top of a rock and even the dust will be scraped (v. 4), and its stones and timbers will be laid in the sea (Eze. 26:12). This was done in 332 BC when Alexander used the material from the ruins of the city on the coast to build a mote out to the island.
    - Tyre will become a place for the spreading of nets (Eze. 26:5, 14). The great mart of the nations eventually became a lowly fishing village.
    - Tyre was a spoil to the nations (Eze. 26:12). After her destruction by Alexander, Tyre did not regain her position as the head of an empire; instead, she was the vassal of whatever power happened to dominate the region.

    Prophecies of Christ’s first coming were fulfilled literally.

    Consider the prophecy of Christ’s first coming in Psalm 22. In this Psalm alone, there are many specific prophecies about Christ’s death, and they were literally fulfilled:

    Psa. 22:1 – Jesus’ words on the cross (Mt. 27:46)
    Psa. 22:6-8, 12-13 – The people reviled Jesus (Mt. 27:39-44)
    Psa. 22:11 – There were none to help Him (Mk. 14:50; Heb. 1:3)
    Psa. 22:14-16 – They crucified Him (Mt. 27:35)
    Psa. 22:14-15 - Christ’s thirst from blood loss (Joh. 19:28)
    Psa. 22:17a – They did not break his bones (Joh. 19:33)
    Psa. 22:17b – They stared at Him (Mt. 27:36)
    Psa. 22:18 – They gambled for his garments (Mt. 27:35; Joh. 19:24)

    Since Bible prophecy has always been fulfilled literally, there is no reason to believe that future prophecies will be fulfilled any differently.

    Fourth, the Lord Jesus said the major prophetic events are yet future.

    In His prophecy in Matthew 24, He described the Great Tribulation and the rule of the Antichrist and said that these events will occur in the future just prior to His literal return (Mt. 24:15-29). It is obvious, then, that the Great Tribulation is not something that has already been fulfilled in history or is being fulfilled, and it is obvious that the Antichrist is a literal man who will desecrate a literal third temple.

    Fifth, Christ rebuked His disciples for not believing the prophecies in their literal interpretation (Lu. 24:25-27).

    Sixth, the stage is set today for the literal fulfillment of the prophecies.

    Everything is ready. The machinery for a one-world government and a one-world religion as described in Revelation 13 and 17 is being set up before our eyes. The technology is in place to control the world’s commerce as described in Revelation 13:16-17 and for the people of the world to observe the events described in Revelation 11:8-10. Most importantly, the nation Israel is back in her land in fulfillment of Ezekiel 37:1-14 (Ezekiel said she would return first in a spiritually-dead condition, verse 8) and in preparation for the literal fulfillment of the rest of her prophecies. She is making preparations to build the third temple, which will be desecrated by the Antichrist. She is looking for a peace-making, temple-building Messiah, which is exactly what the Antichrist will be at the beginning of his reign when he makes a seven-year covenant with Israel as per Daniel 9:27. This supports the doctrine that God has not rejected the nation Israel in a permanent sense or replaced Israel with the Church, but has only temporarily set Israel aside until He is ready to fulfill His covenants with her. This is clearly taught in Romans 11:25-29.
     
  4. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    104
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Seventh, practical necessity demands the literal interpretation of prophecy.

    To interpret Bible prophecy allegorically destroys the absolute sense of God’s Word. It ceases to be a “sure word” (2 Pe. 1:19). If prophecy does not mean exactly what it says, there is no way to know what it does mean. Consider Revelation 20:1-3. If this passage does not mean that a literal angel binds a literal devil in a literal bottomless pit for a literal thousand years, we have no way of knowing for sure what it does mean. If it does not mean what it literally says, it could mean anything that any interpreter says it means.

    Consider this important statement by Paul Lee Tan: “Whether it is the interpretation of prophecy or non-prophecy, once literality is sacrificed, it is like starting down an incline. Momentum speedily gathers as one succumbs to the temptation to spiritualize one passage after another. ... Moreover, under the method of spiritualization, there is no way for an interpreter to test the validity of his conclusions, except to compare his works with that of a colleague. Instead of ‘a more sure word of prophecy’ (2 Pe. 1:19), interpreters end up with an ‘unsure’ word and chaos in the ranks” (Tan, The Interpretation of Prophecy, pp. 73, 74).

    Bible teacher Vernon McGee was trained in the allegorical method of interpretation, but he realized as a young man that it resulted in foolishness: “I went to a seminary that was amillennial, where they attempted to fit the rest of Revelation into the historical, or the amillennial, viewpoint. It became ridiculous and even comical at times. For example, when we reached the place where Scripture says that Satan was put into the bottomless pit, we were taught that that has already taken place. I asked the professor, ‘How do you explain the satanic activity that is taking place today?’ He replied, ‘Satan is chained, but he has a long chain on him. It is like when you take a cow out into a vacant lot and tether her out on a long rope and let her graze.’ That was his explanation! And my comment was, ‘Doctor, I think Satan’s got a pretty long chain on him then, because he is able to graze all over the world today!’ It really makes some Scriptures seem rather ridiculous when you follow the allegorical viewpoint” (Thru the Bible with J. Vernon McGee).

    It is for failure to apply the literal method that the book of Revelation has been so puzzling to Catholic and Protestant commentators. “On the whole no one in the later Middle Ages did more than think of it as a puzzling moral allegory. Luther at first dismissed it; Calvin declined to comment on it. Erasmus’s position was of doubting its authenticity. Acts and Revelation are the only books in Tyndale’s 1534 New Testament without prologues ... his marginal notes to Revelation are so minimal as effectively not to exist” (David Daniell, The Bible in English, p. 348).

    Eighth, prophecy as an apologetic demands a literal interpretation.

    In Isaiah, Jehovah God Himself uses Bible prophecy as evidence that He is its Author. See Isaiah 41:22-23; 44:6-7; 45:21-22; 46:9-10. The reason that Bible prophecy can be used as an evidence of the divine inspiration of Scripture is that it is precise and clear. It contains details such as names, dates, and places. For example, Psalm 22 contains the details of Christ’s death, as we have seen. David wrote this 1,000 years before Christ. It is impossible for man to know such things about the future. For such details about a man’s life to be written in a book hundreds of years before his birth is irrefutable evidence that that book is of God. But if the details of the prophecies are not interpreted literally, the prophecies cannot be used as an apologetic because it will not be clear exactly what is being prophesied. If piercing of the hands and feet, for example, means something other than a literal piercing then the power of the prophecy as an apologetic is destroyed.

    What about the allegory in Galatians 4:21-31?

    Those who interpret prophecy allegorically claim that Paul’s interpretation of Sarah and Hagar in Galatians 4 supports the allegorical approach. The following facts disprove this:

    This is the only case of an Old Testament event spoken of in the New Testament as an allegory.

    The event interpreted allegorically is not a prophetic event; it is a historic event.

    What Paul does here is entirely different from the allegorical method of interpretation, because in Galatians 4, Paul assumes the literal existence of Hagar, Sarah, Mount Sinai, Jerusalem, etc. He cites them as allegories only for the purpose of illustration. The allegorists, though, say that Zion is not Zion and that the 144,000 in Revelation 7 is not 144,000 and the tribes of Israel mentioned in Revelation 7 are not the tribes of Israel and that the 1,000 years in Revelation 20 are not 1,000 years. Paul gives no support for this type of thing.

    When it comes to Bible prophecy, Paul himself interpreted it literally: a literal tribulation (1 Th. 5:1-3), a literal Antichrist (2 Th. 2:8-12), a literal resurrection (1 Co. 15), a literal return of Christ with his saints (1 Th. 3:13; 4:14), a literal kingdom (2 Ti. 4:1), a literal fulfillment of Israel’s promises (Ro. 11:25-27).

    -Wayofife.org
     
  5. One Baptism

    One Baptism Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    20
    The Geneva is incorrect in its identification of the 'angel of the bottomless pit' to the 'Pope'. However, the other explanation, of being a 'literal fallen angel' is also partially incorrect, or partially correct. It does represent satan in part, since he is behind the new manifestation of satanic power that arose in the secular humanism begun in France [revolution, reign of terror, etc], and spread as a ruling ideology over the whole world, which is the 6th Head of Revelation 17, being also identified as the King of the South, in Daniel 11:40 KJB [not going to detail any of that in this present reply].

    Romanism, does mystical interpretations [allegorical if one wills], but it also over literalizes, depending on where it suits its theology. For instance, Romanism will allegorize Genesis [billions of years, theistic evolutionism, etc], and over literalize Revelation [see Woman standing upon the moon, pregnant with a child, whom they teach is literally Mary, in Revelation 12]. Yet they also mix mysticism with the over literalization in Revelation, as they do with the 1,000 years in Revelation 20. So it is not merely one with Romanism, but two things, and they simply swap at each point, even as they also claim to preterism, futurism, hyper-literalism, mysticism, or amillenialism, etc. They refuse, historicism, as that, identifies itself as the anti-christ system.

    Adam Clarke, is also incorrect, because he did not make the connection of Revelation 20, to its parallels in Leviticus 16 & 23; Isaiah 24, Zechariah 14, neither to Psalms 90:4; 2 Peter 3:8, etc KJB. It is literally a 1,000 years, desolate on earth, satan unable to leave, the earth weighed down with the curses, and 7 last plagues, in darkness, etc, as per Zephaniah 1; Isaiah 2, 11, 24 and 34; Jeremiah 4 & 25, etc See also Daniel 7:22, connected to Revelation 20:4 KJB..

    Most confuse the "reigns", the who and their locations. There are 2 reigns, not 1, the one leading into the other.

    [1] The "1000 years" reign "in Heaven" [Psalms 50:5; Matthew 5:3,8,10,12, 6:20, 13:30, 24:31; Mark 10:21, 13:27; Luke 6:23, 18:22, 23:43; John 14:2-3, 17:24; Colossians 1:5; Hebrews 10:34; 1 Peter 1:4; Revelation 7:9, 14:3, 19:1; "Paradise", Luke 23:43; 2 Corinthians 12:4; Revelation 2:7] with CHRIST JESUS [1 Thessalonians 4:16-17; Revelation 20:6] and...

    [2] The "reign on earth" ["made new", not this sin polluted Earth; 2 Peter 3:13; Isaiah 65:17, 66:22; Revelation 21:1] that lasts "forever and ever" [Revelation 5:10; "meek inherit earth" ["made new", not this sin polluted Earth], Psalms 37:9,11,34; Proverbs 11:31; Isaiah 25:8, 65:21; Daniel 7:27; Matthew 5:5; Revelation 5:10].​

    Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, are also incorrect. No saved will be on earth during the length of the 1,000 years. That is the prison house for satan and his fallen angels, a habitation of dragons and owls, for the whole time, again see Isaiah 24, etc. KJB.
     
    #5 One Baptism, Mar 7, 2018
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2018
  6. Jordan Kurecki

    Jordan Kurecki Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    104
    Faith:
    Baptist
    note those were examples of the allegorical interpretation, not meant in any way to defend allegorical interpretation.
     
  7. One Baptism

    One Baptism Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2015
    Messages:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    20
    Yes, I understand.
     
Loading...