1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

America's ignorance of Obama 'disturbing'

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Revmitchell, Nov 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    It is too early to tell. We have to wait and see what comes to pass. I think big spending is always dangerous, because someone has to pay for it.
     
  2. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That's the problem with Obama's largest spending recommendations. He never mentions how we pay for them.

    Got any guesses?
     
  3. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    Well, if you will pardon my reference to history here, there are only three possible sources of revenue, borrow, print money or raise taxes.

    We don't know the future, but I assume Pres Obama will continue the tax and spend policies of his predecessors, leading to greater indebtedness. I would love to see American elect a fiscal conservative, but just don't of any out there. People vote with their wallets, there is no doubt about that, and no one really wants the lean budget that fiscal conservatism would we require. People, to a huge extend, live their own personal lives on their credit cards so have no problem with their government doing the same.

    I don't think people are ignorant of big spending plans, they just don't care.
     
  4. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    If you had bothered to read any of my posts, you would know that Obama's economic policies are not even a consideration to me.

    The change I want (again you never read posts) is to return to running this country by the Constitution. People with your mindset are a roadblock to that change because you insist on maintaining the liberal stauts quo by defending one liberal mainstream party over another.

    In reality, or facts as you say, your position is much closer to Obama than mine.

    Later, Mr Strawman.
     
  5. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Good analysis.

    The major difference I see in the plans of Obama is the degree of the "greater indebtedness". I predict it will be historically enormous, beyond the scope of anything we can even imagine.

    Maybe enormous enough to wake people up. Maybe not.
     
  6. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    There is no major difference and that is exactly where your logic fails.
     
  7. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    The dollar sign on the national debt clock was recently replaced with a digit to reflect a $10 trillion plus debt. Will another digit need to be added? Since debt and spending are exponential, I would not be surprised.
     
  8. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why bother?

    They're all the same.
     
  9. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    As are yours, titled the liberal Republican apologist.
     
  10. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Thanks to G. Bush it is already beyond anything we can imagine ... and Bush has set it up so the debt will continue for years to come. Obama can't turn this ship around quickly ... no one can.



    Year-- Debt -- US Gross Debt as % of GDP
    2000-- 5,674 -- 58 %
    2005-- 7,933 -- 64.6 %
    2007-- 9,008 -- 65.5 %
    2008-- 10,024.7 -- 72.5 % (EST)
     
    #30 Crabtownboy, Nov 25, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 25, 2008
  11. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Strawman again.

    Just can't seem to deal with the subject at hand.:laugh:
     
  12. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    Pot meet kettle. Another liberal vs liberal debate.
     
  13. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You are giving your opinion on the future ... which is just an opinion.

    I give you facts on the past which are uncomfortable facts if you are claiming G. Bush did a responsible job of handling the economy.

    To run the debt from 5 trillion to over ten trillion is not good economic policy. Under Bush the debt has risen from 58% of GNP to 72.5% of GNP. That is not good, not good at all. And because of his policies, it will probably get worse.
     
  14. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    2
    Oh, you mean like the last eight years.

    Would you like some cheese with your whine?
    [​IMG]
     
  15. dragonfly

    dragonfly New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,594
    Likes Received:
    0
    Of course they aren't the issue, they don't support your stance. :laugh:

    You cherry pick the information you want other to consider. You brought up deficits and Obama. In bringing up deficits you should see how Reagan and Bush have done exactly what you accuse Obama of doing although he is not in office.

    Maybe you should take the blinders off and have an honest debate about deficits, but I doubt you will. You will just continue to spew your prophecy about what Obama might or might not do, nothing else.
     
  16. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And this is incorrect. It overlooks the amount of sales tax that is brought in from a moving economy without the raising of taxes.
     
  17. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    80
    I stand corrected. I should have technically said, 'increasing tax revenue' instead of 'raising taxes.' Thank you for your attention to detail.

    However, an increase in tax revenue thanks for a moving economy is not likely in a recessionary spiral. into which I think economists along the full spectrum agree we are heading.
     
    #37 NaasPreacher (C4K), Nov 25, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 25, 2008
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist

    Agreed. So the plan should be to enable spending. What is happening however is that in the past a few intelligent banks did not get involved in sub prime loans and expanded to make the secure. So the bailout money is being used for the latter at a time when it should be used to make loans available. They are all working for long term preservation and the tax payers did not give them the money for that purpose.

    Anyway Obama's plan to not repeal the tax cuts is a good one at this time.
     
  19. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,006
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is not a single thing anti-American about socialism as an economic system.
     
  20. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,006
    Likes Received:
    1,492
    Faith:
    Baptist
    #40 KenH, Nov 25, 2008
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2008
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...