AOC Visits an X-Rated Burlesque Show

Homosexuality is a sin and God said so. That eliminates the possibility that it is genetic tendency.

What would I have done? I would have led him to Jesus, as He is the only One who could deliver him from his sin. Homosexuals need to get saved. They don't need to be coddled. They need Jesus. Jesus will remove their sin. I have seen it multiple times. I would have led Him to salvation. That's what I would have done.

We address it all of the time. Maybe you're just not listening.

Sure. The difference is that we are not pushing for adulterer rights. We are not demanding that everyone except adultery as a valid lifestyle.

The reason why we are addressing homosexual sin as much as we do, is because the homosexual community is imposing upon us a forced acceptance of their sin as normal and good. They are the ones making it an issue. They are the ones imposing it on us.

The homosexual community is not interested in peaceful co-existence. They want their sin normalized, mainstreamed to the point that they want to minority status, the same as African Americans or any other recognized minority. They want to force the Church to accept their lifestyle as valid to the point that we will be forced to ordain them into the ministry and allow gay people to occupy leadership in our churches.

THAT's why we talk about it so much.

 

Yes, they are. That is what the "equality" act is all about. If it goes into effect, Churches that don't allow gays to be ordained can and will be sued.

You are really not up on the facts. The very fact that Christians are being sued for refusing to participate in homosexual activities like gay weddings due their faith, is proof that they are forcing acceptance of homosexuality.

 

It's not about us judging anyone. But God has judged the homosexual lifestyle and those live in it are under His judgment.

We are allowed to judge what God has already judged and that is why we can offer salvation to those imprisoned by homosexuality.

 

It depends on how you present it. Hell is a real place and Jesus preached about Hell. People go to Hell. The fact is that people need to know WHY they need salvation. The level of importance you place on Hell will determine the level of importance you place on Jesus.

And if they walk away from the Gospel, that is between them and God. People walked away from Jesus when He was on earth. It is not a failure on our part if someone rejects the Gospel, properly presented to them. As long as we have been obedient, what the prospect does with what they heard is not our responsibility.

It is no different than if I drive by someone's house in the middle of the night and it is on fire with them asleep inside and I start banging on their windows and yelling trying to wake them up and save their lives. They need to know the danger they are in and get out. I would be real jerk if I just drove by and did nothing.

There is a way to make people aware of Hell without it being an offensive presentation. They might still be offended no matter how you present it, but I am only responsible for telling them the truth in love. I am not responsible for how they receive it. That is between them and God.

Jesus didn't sugar coat the reality of Hell, neither did Paul.

The problem here is that you promoting a lie that we view the Republican party as the "Christian party." That is simply not the case. That is what you deflect to, when you can't really muster up a mature, adult, substantive, intelligent response.

 

The Democrat party embraces infanticide, it embraces homosexuality, the LGBTQ lifestyle, it the party that is openly anti-Christian and rejects Jesus. So, you cannot support a party that is opposed to everything that is biblical AND Christian, but claim to be a Christian.

That does NOT mean that we think the Republican party is the party of Jesus. We simply know that the Democrat party is paving the way for the Antichrist.

 

Nope, Trump is too unpopular to be the Antichrist. But you people are preparing the way for the Antichrist with your open borders and one-world globalism.