• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russian govt

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In a John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday courtesy of Dartmouth Films, whistleblower Julian Assange categorically denied that the troves of US Democratic Party and Clinton work and staff emails released this year have come from the Russian government.
“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.


https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
In a John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday courtesy of Dartmouth Films, whistleblower Julian Assange categorically denied that the troves of US Democratic Party and Clinton work and staff emails released this year have come from the Russian government.
“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute John Pilger Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films.


https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/

Exclusive broadcast for what? He's in possession of hacked private information. Why would anyone trust him or take his word about from whom he got it?[emoji23]

And his statement above makes no sense. How can he say her statement is false if it's what the intelligence agencies said?

Saying "we can say..." doesn't prove that the intelligence agencies didn't tell her that Russia was the source.[emoji38]

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 

Rob_BW

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So when he's releasing Bradley Manning's stolen information, the libs love him. But only now that he's releasing dirt on Hillary, he's a bad guy.

Of course, having RT, pravda redux, release the story doesn't help their case.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
So when he's releasing Bradley Manning's stolen information, the libs love him. But only now that he's releasing dirt on Hillary, he's a bad guy.

Of course, having RT, pravda redux, release the story doesn't help their case.
You'll have to take your objection up with the liberals of which I ain't.

Why would anyone take the words of those organizations over the 17 intelligence agencies?

Even that ole FBI that's so popular with the GOP these days has said they believe the Russians are responsible.

Pick your poison.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I tried to listen to HRC in one of her campaign speeches yesterday and she has reverted to her arm waving, shrieking voice and jerking her head back and forth.

HankD
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
I tried to listen to HRC in one of her campaign speeches yesterday and she has reverted to her arm waving, shrieking voice and jerking her head back and forth.

HankD
At least she can read. The more I hear Trump, I'm convinced he can't read that well if at all. I've seen it before. Might explain why he tries so hard to sound intelligent and ends up repeating a bunch of gibberish that makes him sound slow in the head.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
At least she can read. The more I hear Trump, I'm convinced he can't read that well if at all. I've seen it before. Might explain why he tries so hard to sound intelligent and ends up repeating a bunch of gibberish that makes him sound slow in the head.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Well, yes its true. I am disappointed that he doesn't have that smooth, suave, intellectual st-st-st-stutter and emotional delivery of the elite establishment politician.

I really mean that, if he did he would be way ahead of Hillary.

HankD
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why would anyone believe this information.

I am surprised that anyone on the BB is an apologist for Assange or Russia.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Clinton politico machine is very careful not to deny the veracity and ownership of the emails.

There are unique authorship time stamps and word for word serial algorithms to validate each email.

They know that and don't want to be caught in yet one more deception (if indeed they are being deceitful).

HankD
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Well, yes its true. I am disappointed that he doesn't have that smooth, suave, intellectual st-st-st-stutter and emotional delivery of the elite establishment politician.

I really mean that, if he did he would be way ahead of Hillary.

HankD
I think he really can't read Hank. When the teleprompter is up there, he "reads" as though he's reciting or repeating something someone is saying in his ear.

I think he might be good with numbers, and that happens a lot with folks who can't read.

But he has classic signs of a person covering a reading disability.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think he really can't read Hank. When the teleprompter is up there, he "reads" as though he's reciting or repeating something someone is saying in his ear.

I think he might be good with numbers, and that happens a lot with folks who can't read.

But he has classic signs of a person covering a reading disability.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Yes he does lack the fluidity of a seasoned teleprompter reader.

Also he doesn't have that movie actor smoothness of portraying the persona of someone other than himself.

These skills of course developed by politicians on both sides of the aisle.

Not so much either for Third party candidates "What is Aleppo?"

One would think that as an anti-establishment candidate that would work in Trump's favor but alas not so.

HankD
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Lol! My Diet Coke came out of my nose after reading this! :Roflmao
Did you pass out? Did it choke you just a little bit?[emoji12]

If it did, let me think of some other stuff to type that makes you laugh while drinking something.
Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 
Top