bank of (un)Amerika freezes gun makers accounts

So no account should ever be frozen. It is immoral to freeze an account of a person, company or country regardless of what they are doing with the money.

You are illogical when you say acting on beliefs is not a virtue itself and can be immoral. I agree the action may be immoral. But also the action may be moral. It is not all one and not any of the other regardless of circumstance.

Have you thought that we do not have the entire story of to whom the gun parts were being sold? Would you approve the freeze if it were proven they were selling them to terrorists organizations?

Rev. you thinking is too narrow. Try taking a broader view before making rash, illogical statements.

 

The stench of hypocrisy is thick in this thread.

If it were Chick fil-A you'd be arguing that a company policy must be divorced from the beliefs of its board.

 

Of course that would be a noble and courageous bank that would do that!

 

Frozen by a private entity without a court order, no. It is the account holder's money, not the bank's to make inaccessible at whim. If a bank wants to close an account and refunds the holder, I've little problem with that.

 

Rash is this post.

 

Only went to where your illogical post lead.

 

He doesn't care about the truth of the matter. He wants to defend someone taking action against a gun manufacture. He understands the true details. He is just ignoring them.

 

Certainly it would be immoral. It's not the bank's job to worry about how money is spent. They simply need to do their job and keep our money safe.

 

It is wrong for any bank to freeze any assets unless it is in their terms and conditions. The thought and intent of such a bank might be good in their own eyes, but it would still be wrong.

I am still suspecting there is much more to this story than meets the eye. Something is not quite right here.

 

This I agree with.