• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Bush made it official

Status
Not open for further replies.

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"This is in large part because of severe problems in our housing, credit and financial markets, which have resulted in significant job losses"
 

LeBuick

New Member
Revmitchell said:
"This is in large part because of severe problems in our housing, credit and financial markets, which have resulted in significant job losses"

No, we've been loosing jobs the last few years which was long before the other problems surfaced. It began with the sucking sound from jobs going overseas and hasn't let up. Then the tax rule that exempted corporations from paying taxes on money earned overseas made it more of a hurricane with jobs leaving.

I will say the recent trouble has started a second waive of job losses. Now the construction industry and their suppliers are impacted. Before it was the technology and manufacturing jobs.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
No, we've been loosing jobs the last few years which was long before the other problems surfaced. It began with the sucking sound from jobs going overseas and hasn't let up. Then the tax rule that exempted corporations from paying taxes on money earned overseas made it more of a hurricane with jobs leaving.

I will say the recent trouble has started a second waive of job losses. Now the construction industry and their suppliers are impacted. Before it was the technology and manufacturing jobs.

Is there anyone else in the world that supports your theory?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
No, we've been loosing jobs the last few years which was long before the other problems surfaced. It began with the sucking sound from jobs going overseas and hasn't let up.


Easy to say.

Prove it.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
. Then the tax rule that exempted corporations from paying taxes on money earned overseas made it more of a hurricane with jobs leaving.

It's abundantly clear that you don't have a clue what you are talking about.
 

LeBuick

New Member
Not sure what you guys are disputing, are you disputing that we were loosing jobs before the recent economic down turn? Are you disputing last year we had record job losses as well as several preceding years? Is that what you're disputing?
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
Not sure what you guys are disputing, are you disputing that we were loosing jobs before the recent economic down turn? Are you disputing last year we had record job losses as well as several preceding years? Is that what you're disputing?

It's clear that you are avoiding the questions because you don't have the answers to back up your specious claims.
 

ray Marshall

New Member
webdog said:
Notice it's due to the mess caused by the Clinton administration.

It's not only with Clinton, but it took years of special planning by the powers that be to get their dreams to at last come to pass. Now Don't act like you don't know anything or even expect anything is wrong in our present time.....But some of you probably will. If not, I apoligize right now.
 

LeBuick

New Member
Not sure why I would need someone to corroborate my insertion when it is supported by facts. Here are the unemployment rates since Bush took office. Now keep something in mind that really skews these numbers, the unemployment figures are a measurement of people who are applying for benefits. They don't include people who have exhausted their benefits so are no longer in these numbers. I got the number here from the labor department.

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2000 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
2001 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
2002 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0
2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4
2005 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.8

2006 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4
2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 5.0
2008 4.9 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.7


As you can see, the unemployment rates have been going up since 2001. Many American's are so frustrated they've stopped looking for a job since everywhere they go people are downsizing and not hiring.

Offshoring from my memory began about 2002 which was also the year Enron and Worldcom were cooking the books. During all these years, CEO's began making record salaries and bonuses while workers were reduced and reduced and many jobs went out of this country.

Here is a study the government did when offshoring really became a concern

While traditional economic theory predicts that offshoring is likely to benefit the overall economy, concerns have been raised about four areas of potential impact: on the average U.S. standard of living, employment and job loss, income distribution, and security.

So it was predicted these massive job losses would be a product of offshoring yet nothing was done to stop it.

I repeat, job losses have been on the rise long before this economic crises. Just look at this year alone, we've lost millions of jobs just this year before the economy tanked.
 

LeBuick

New Member
webdog said:
Notice it's due to the mess caused by the Clinton administration.

The economy tanked on the Republican watch. Just like it did before Clinton came in office and just like it did before Carter.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
Not sure why I would need someone to corroborate my insertion when it is supported by facts. Here are the unemployment rates since Bush took office. Now keep something in mind that really skews these numbers, the unemployment figures are a measurement of people who are applying for benefits. They don't include people who have exhausted their benefits so are no longer in these numbers. I got the number here from the labor department.

http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&series_id=LNS14000000

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2000 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
2001 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.7
2002 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.9 6.0
2003 5.8 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7
2004 5.7 5.6 5.8 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.4
2005 5.2 5.4 5.2 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.8

2006 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.4
2007 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 5.0
2008 4.9 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.7


As you can see, the unemployment rates have been going up since 2001. Many American's are so frustrated they've stopped looking for a job since everywhere they go people are downsizing and not hiring.

Offshoring from my memory began about 2002 which was also the year Enron and Worldcom were cooking the books. During all these years, CEO's began making record salaries and bonuses while workers were reduced and reduced and many jobs went out of this country.

Here is a study the government did when offshoring really became a concern



So it was predicted these massive job losses would be a product of offshoring yet nothing was done to stop it.

I repeat, job losses have been on the rise long before this economic crises. Just look at this year alone, we've lost millions of jobs just this year before the economy tanked.


First, companies can do business any where they like. We are a free country. So it is not anyone's authority to "stop it". Second there are many factors that are included in decisions to do business out side of the country to include less expensive wages, new technology that makes it possible etc. Trying to put this all on tax incentives and the President is a clear misrepresentation. I am just going by your source.
 

LeBuick

New Member
Revmitchell said:
First, companies can do business any where they like. We are a free country. So it is not anyone's authority to "stop it". Second there are many factors that are included in decisions to do business out side of the country to include less expensive wages, new technology that makes it possible etc. Trying to put this all on tax incentives and the President is a clear misrepresentation. I am just going by your source.

I agree in theory, but when the government incents companies to send jobs overseas, that is treason against the people...

http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=213&Itemid=61

The main Bill that created the sucking of jobs was H.R. 4520 which was ironically named of American Jobs Creation Act Of 2004.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0402/17/ldt.00.html

Greg Mankiw, the top economist here at the White House, stirred up Democratic criticism and even outrage from key Republicans last week when he said that outsourcing, sending low-wage jobs out of the United States overseas, was a logical extension of a free trade economy and that, over time, would make the U.S. economy more efficient..

You see, the Republican's not only encouraged jobs to move overseas, they thought it would be good for the economy. I think they got that wrong.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
I agree in theory, but when the government incents companies to send jobs overseas, that is treason against the people...

http://maloney.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=213&Itemid=61

The main Bill that created the sucking of jobs was H.R. 4520 which was ironically named of American Jobs Creation Act Of 2004.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0402/17/ldt.00.html



You see, the Republican's not only encouraged jobs to move overseas, they thought it would be good for the economy. I think they got that wrong.

You still don't have a clue what HR4520 does and have not provided one scintilla of evidence that it sent even one job overseas.

I am just trying to determine if your misrepresentations are deliberate or ignorance.
 

LeBuick

New Member
carpro said:
You still don't have a clue what HR4520 does and have not provided one scintilla of evidence that it sent even one job overseas.

I am just trying to determine if your misrepresentations are deliberate or ignorance.

Did you read either of the links I provided. They both discussed how HR4520 did send jobs overseas.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
LeBuick said:
Did you read either of the links I provided. They both discussed how HR4520 did send jobs overseas.

Your links are biased and still do not support your statements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top