Covid Vax Injuries Reach One Million

Those reports to VARES are just like a vote. They only count if the powers that be want them to.

 

I get it ... the numbers/percentages.

... but I also understand that any drug with an absolute number of these adverse effects would have been pulled LONG LONG ago.

I couldn't tell from the article, but are all these adverse effects still being realized from only 5% of the lot numbers?

 

except for the 5% lot number thing, @JonC

hundreds of millions of jabs given ... but of 5% there is a MASSIVE massive problem.

Today you're taking a flight out of Atlanta where there are about 1000 daily departures. 50 of 'em each day will crash/burn. you gonna fly outta Atlanta?

 

Why not?

We already know there are saline bottles in the distribution. Evidently there are varying concentrations in the distribution, too ... which would lend credence to the 5% ... which is actually pretty good. That means 95% of the vials will bring less than 5% of the adverse effects.

But I appreciate your finally accepting we didn't do NEARLY enough testing before release.

The fact there isn't a tracker listing (as less than 10% of the adverse effects get reported) for a new drug which skipped 9.25 years on the timeline ... that should be concerning, if not troublesome.

 

the data point about 5% lot numbers isn't in the article, it's in an analysis of the VAERS data which evidently includes the lot numbers of the cv vax vial.

You seem to disregard the compilation of the data which the government agency is reporting. How do you determine which government source to accept and which to reject?

Given this particular source says it doesn't have the full picture of adverse effects, just using the ones it DOES have is bad enough. I mean, I suppose the democrats could be dithering the VAERS data as they did the 2020 POTUS election count, but wouldn't that be just crazy conspiracy theory?

Gonna present the analogy again using the government's own statements about its data: 1000 flights each day out of Atlanta. 50 of 'em are going to crash & burn (just Atlanta, not NY, not DFW, not MIA) ... you gonna fly out of ATL? I doubt it.

I'll allow your argument about needing more data on the adverse effects aspect. If the human trials had taken the historical period of time to deploy a new TYPE of vaccine, we'd know all this; or at least we'd have a whole lot better idea than we did in Dec '20 We'd also know the necessity of boosters; the frequency and total number of 'em. But we were shocked and awed by Operation Warp Speed. We were clamoring for a "shot of hope" so we threw caution to the wind and spent hours sitting our vehicles in football stadium/NASCAR parking lots awaiting "processing."

 

well shoot! Pfizer says "need more shots"

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/10/pfi...d-vaccine-doses-arent-enough-for-omicron.html

This guy's substack (?) has been linked before. Here's an article discussing this Pfizer CEO's comments ... links various studies from around the world about the effective duration of these boosters.

The trend is NOT good on this. A trend in which a standard duration human trial would have validated or corrected.

New studies show that the COVID vaccines damage your immune system, likely permanently

" In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else."

This was one of my concerns after researching what the mRNA experimental vaxes would do ... even allowing for perfection (which is unattainable in any human endeavor) in the immunity against covid19, given this is done by being in a constant state of cell-mediated response, the immune system may be getting "comm jammed" to other pathogens. e.g. a different pathogen may be able to "sneak" by undetected because the system is flooded with processes of killing the S Spike protein which was self-generated.

I won't say I expected this condition to manifest as it apparently IS, but it's question I posed which should have been answered from human trials ... and wasn't. Instead ... "shot of hope."

 

... and ya know what ... at least anecdotally, this greater susceptibility to omicron by the jabbed/boosted is revealed in the airline flight schedules. The highest percentage jabbed (United) had the worst cancellation record "due to lacking crews" over the holiday. But the rest of 'em are gaining .... in approximate correlation to their own relative cv jab rate.

Isn't that interesting.

 

Hmmm. Now we’re getting somewhere. One suggests more time is needed to evaluate potential side-effects. The other suggests more time is needed to evaluate potential side-effects.

 

yep once again we do not nor can we know what the long term effects of this vax will be no matter how many times mods on this board say we do

 

Yep, and also a "disconnection," if there is none. It matters both ways, and matters a lot.

The real question in all of this is, who cares? Or rather, who doesn't? Those who have the power, the money, and the means to investigate all of this, not to mention the responsibility, don't seem particularly interested in the truth. Not a good sign.

 

Good one-sided post.

It is equally difficult to get past the the pro-mandate disinformation. Big Tech and Big Pharma are very powerful.

 

That's more like it. Determining where the lines are being crossed from credible to not is not a simple matter. And some very powerful people are not helping the matter, but may well be helping themselves.