• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Did Jack Hyles advocate any heretical views?

Armchair Apologist

Active Member
Spencer Smith listed "KJV only salvation" as one of the heresies taught by Jack Hyles (Empire of Error, pp. 166-168). Concerning the statement of Jack Hyles concerning the Revised Standard Version, Spencer Smith wrote: "This makes the English translation itself part of the mechanics of regeneration, placing salvation under a translation test that the Bible never gives" (p. 167).
Spencer Smith is KJV-Only as well (and I disagree with him on many things) but he effectively illustrates the differences between his own position and those who are really "Wackadoodle" regarding this matter. On the topic of the "incorruptible seed," I would say that he was even further "out there" than was Peter Ruckman! I am pretty sure Ruckman believed that someone could be saved using a so-called "Perversion" but it was like "eating a steak found in a trashcan" or something to that effect. I heard him say so himself.
 

Logos1560

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Spencer Smith wrote: "One of the more troubling theological statements attributed to Jack Hyles involved comments he made concerning his unsaved father and the possibility of alleviating his suffering in Hell through his own life and ministry. On February 7, 1988, Jack Hyles preached a sermon called 'Full Reward.' In the sermon, Hyles stated a reference to his unsaved father:
'I'd like to think that my life would keep my daddy from suffering as much as he would if I hadn't lived'" (Empire of Error, p. 169).

Spencer Smith wrote: "Another controversial accusation surrounding Jack Hyles involved statements critics interpreted as praying to the dead and seeking intercession from his deceased mother" (p. 180).
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Do you think Jack Hyles was a genuine Christian pastor who just went rogue due to pride and lust?

Or was he a wolf in sheep’s clothing from the beginning?

Perhaps only God can judge.
Only God can judge, and I think he was born again, but the fame of building large churches, a college and all that, got to him and made him proud. Then when John R. Rice died and he was free to go his own way, he went off the rails. When Rice was sick and nearing Heaven, Hyles got in trouble with the Rice sisters by embellishing a fancy story about him and Rice. I have in my files a copy of an obsequious letter Hyles wrote apologizing for that. I've heard him embellish other sermon illustrations even back then, claiming things happened to him that happened to others. After Rice died he considered himself the leader of fundamentalism and thought people would honor him no matter what he did or said. Sad.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I remembered all of that "100% for Hyles" nonsense and was actually at a Pastor's Conference in Santa Clara around 1989 right after all of the Sumner Articles came out. Crazy night and they were passing out "100% for Hyles" buttons and "God help you" if you expressed anything less than unwavering support! This was probably the beginning of the end for me in that "world."
I wrote in my biography of John R. Rice that Hyles himself had those 100% buttons made, but later learned it was actually Bob Gray of Texas from his book, When Principle Was King: The Life Principles of Dr. Jack Hyles. Hyles could not have a more loyal acolyte than Gray!
Shelton Smith pretty much represented everything I wanted to get away from pertaining to the IFB world at that time. I gained a great deal of respect for the Rice family and made me realize that there were still some good people in the IFB world even though I couldn't seem to find them. The Rice Sisters seem like wonderful ladies and I'm sorry I never got to know them! Condolences about your mom!
Both Hyles and Smith were/are very gracious in person. But it was very "dangerous" to get on the bad side of Hyles if you were in that ministry! I've not seen that same attitude in Smith.

The two remaining Rice sisters are about to close down their ministry since they are in their 90's now. Here's the website: Home | Joyful Christian Ministries They still have some wonderful resources there for the Christian women in your life.
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Jack Hyles I knew of was from the mid-80s on. I was saved in 1981 and therefore know little of Jack Hyles or of the IFB world prior to this. It seems to me that he really went off the rails (or perhaps this was when the dirt started coming out?) in the late 1980s with the controversies fueled by the "Sumner Articles" and this crowd really started "circling the wagons" castigating anyone who expressed any criticism towards Hyles or their particular brand of "Fundamentalism."

Seemed to me that at one time, he preached and proclaimed the gospel and that many attest their salvation to his ministry. Hykes-Anderson College has trained many pastors and missionaries and many of them are faithfully serving in the ministry and some are doing so perhaps in spite of the sub-standard training and education they have received? Among these are some I have known and served with personally.
I've noted the same thing. Had some good friends in Japan from the early days of the college. On the other hand, an HAC grad missionary to the military in Germany, who was a good friend, decided to support my ministry so he sent me a 7 page questionnaire. When I saw it I knew the friendship was over. He went off the rails, had moral trouble, had to leave the ministry. His oldest son became an atheist policeman in Florida, then was murdered by a jealous husband. Very sad business.
According to my understanding, Jack Hyles was far more moderate and his stand on the King James was similar to that of John R. Rice. Seems that John of Japan would be able to speak more intelligently of this than I could but John R. Rice reflected the more moderate and sensible wing of the Independent Baptist "Movement" as opposed to his buddy J. Frank Norris but this something of which I would leave you to do your own research - it would make for another interesting topic.
Rice was not KJVO, as you know, though he preached from it and loved it. He studied from the old ASV, and studied the original languages. As long as Hyles teamed up with him, Hyles was not KJVO. In fact, in his book Let's Study the Revelation (1960's), he points out some translation errors in the KJV! In my biography of John R. Rice I have a segment on Norris, and a chapter on Rice's relationship with Hyles, if you're interested. See the bottom of my post.
 
Top