Did Jesus Have the Same nature as Adam. Or All of Us then?

you were not bormn ri

The verse does not say you were righteous, you just didn't get the sin of your father.
you got your sin by yourself

 

Eze 18:20

The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him


If I did not receive a sin debt from my father how is the fall still in effect?

 

The fall was not spiritual, it was physical. Sinful beings were already here.

 

The presentation of Scripture is that in every physical way, the Christ was physical. Bones, sinew, blood, lungs, heart, kidneys, brain, eyes,...

The presentation of Scripture was that Christ was made in every aspect as a human, yet not sinful, or sin inclined.

One of the interesting verses on this is Philippians’s:

4Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. 5Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, 6who, though he was in the form of God, (God is Spirit)
did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. 8And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

​

There was never a time Christ was not God. But there was a time God was not in human form.

That said, because the Scriptures place the condemnation as flowing through the males (the first Adam) then it follows the genetic core of sin of the flesh is bound to being born of the flesh with the desires and passions of that fallen flesh.

Therefore, I see consistency in both your thinking and that of Yeshua1.

The difference perhaps is more upon emphasis rather then substantive dispute.

Jesus taking on “our nature” is as a physical attribute manner. This is as Phillipeans presents. However, as God, He did not have the spirit of humankind, could not have that fallen nature of prone to sin and already sinful. ​

 

Where did you devise that thinking?

The fall was both spiritual and physical.

One cannot rebel against God and not expect both spiritual and physical results.

I am not quite understanding what your statement means when you posted, “Sinful beings were already here.”

Are you referring to the serpent?

If you are, then perhaps you are mistaking that estate of angels and that creation in which God breathed “the breath of life.”

 

There is a difference between our will and the will of Christ.

The will of the human nature is fallen, a rebelliousness that may be broken into submission or subdued by the work of the Holy Spirit guiding the believer in all truth.

The will of Christ was never a fallen will. It did not need broken into submission, rather a continuation of submission from eternity past through to the final bowing to the God in Revelation.

Your statement, "Could any of us do likewise? Yes..." Is incorrect.

There is no ability to take what is fallen into the presence of God for eternity. Even in our prayers, the Spirit makes them acceptable to God, not our own fleshly will. Humanity cannot attain to such not because of being unwilling but because the willing is as corrupt and rebellious as any other "part" of the human. This is also why no human can willingly accept the things of Christ but must have a change (or addition) made to the core of who they are and in that change to the core the belief is implanted.

Because Christ never had a fallen will, but the will of the Creator (Himself) and was not in a state of rebellion, for can the Creator have a rebellion against Himself, then Christ could attain what no human effort could in yielding. He could express the desire of avoiding the crucifixion and yet that not be a state of rebellion against the will of the Father.

Imo, too often in human terms the rebellion against God is not seen as the issue in the first Adam. Such a rebellion as desires all constraints of what is righteous to be discarded. This is why God's focus is upon the first Adam and not the first Eve. Adam was not tricked, he was not deceived, and he certainly was not unaware of the consequences. He rebelled and such is born in the natural estate of all. At the first demand of that conceived in the womb taking from the mother, the rebellion is bound in the heart.

Christ had no such heart, no such rebellion, therefore, He, alone, could do what no human could no matter the level of human submission.