1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

dinosaurs and man together

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Helen, Nov 26, 2006.

  1. Samuel Owen

    Samuel Owen New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    I am inclined to agree with you. I have often been approached with this subject, and usually try to avoid it. I feel if it were in our interests, God would have revealed the answers. But since it has nothing to do with reveling Christ, or anything to do with Salvation, or our Christian walk, I guess he did not feel it was too important.

    I really don't believe we have to be apologetic to Science, for our differences in view. Or worry about whether they agree with their opinions. Most scientists are trying to figure out a way to eliminate God, from their picture of things in the first place. So I don't see it is our place to help them out.

    As far as the Dino's I really don't know where they fit in. But I really don't let it concern me to much. :)
     
  2. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    2
    About Peleg and Job, in response to the previous questions.

    First, the catastrophe of Peleg's time was not the same as Babel. They are separated by two or three generations. Genesis 10:25 tells us that Peleg received his name because in his time the earth was divided. The Hebrew word used for 'earth' there is 'eretz' -- the same word used in Genesis 1:1 ("In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"). 'Eretz', however, does not mean the round globe of earth as we think of it, but rather, literally, 'that which is firm'. Thus, the meaning can be anything from atoms (vs. space) to continents to planets, etc. One thing 'eretz' does NOT mean, however, is people, or populations (unless it is referring to the place where they live). So, in Peleg's time, something firm was divided.

    The name 'Peleg' gives us a clue. It is from PLG, and the root gives us a number of words we know well, such as 'archipelago', 'pelican,' and the ancient word for the Mediterranean: "Pelagos." The root word means to divide by rushing waters. That there was also volcanic activity is indicated by the fact that the name 'Pele' or 'Pelee' remains as a named volcano in the Caribbean and the Hawaiian volcano goddess.

    Where does Job fit in? Look at Peleg's brother in Genesis 10. His name is Joktan (which means 'to diminish, make small, kill, destroy'). The very names themselves indicate something was going on! Joktan's thirteenth son is Jobab. Jobab means 'to cry out.' His brothers have names that mean 'to pull out or pluck off' (Sheleph), 'separation and ruin' (Hazar-Maveth), 'devastation/desolation' (the root of Sheba), and 'twist, writhe' (Havilah). Job is a shortened form of Jobab. Is it the same person? In the ancient Alexandrian LXX, there is a bit more to the book of Job than our modern translations (based on the Masoretic) have -- it lists Job's age at the time of his death as 248. This fits exactly with the time just following Peleg's life and does not fit anywhere else in the genealogies.

    A second clue is also given when comparing Genesis 10 with Job 1. Job lived in the land of Uz. Uz was his great, great, (maybe one more great...) uncle. Job lived in his territory. The fit is hard to escape.

    So let's take a look at some of the catastrophes Job lived through (I have lifted the following from some of my husband's lecture notes, thus the different type of writing):
    Note: the text was too long for one post so I have divided it and it will continue on the second response.

    Job 9:5‑7
    "God removes the mountains and overturns them in His anger;
    He shakes the earth out of its place and its core trembles;
    He commands the sun & it does not rise; and He blots out the stars…”

    1. VOLCANISM, RIFTING, MAGMAJob 28:9,14:18.
    As crust tears apart in Jordan rift – during ice-age – many catastrophic events.
    Explains passages like this:
    The mountains fall and crumble away
    And rock is moved from its place ...

    For God overturns the mountains from their roots
    And cuts out channels through the rocks,
    ... And underneath it is turned to fire,
    Whose stones are the source of sapphires
    And contains gold dust.

    Job and friends – observed molten rock flowing from volcanic vents – knew gems crystallized out

    1. VOLCANIC FIRESTORMSJob 27:20‑22.
    Volcanic effects of rifting in Jordan valley – massive volcanic storms – tornadic winds

    "A storm steals him away in the night.
    A burning [fiery] wind carries him away, and he is gone;
    It sweeps him out of his place.
    It hurls against him and does not spare.
    These effects there in first chapter of Job 1:16, 19.

    "Fire has fallen from heaven
    and burned up the sheep and servants and
    consumed them…
    and suddenly a great wind from the wilderness
    struck the four corners of the house,
    and it fell on the young men...

    Volcanic fire - tornadic winds - fell from skies – destroyed flocks/houses/people.
    Not ordinary fire or wind – too large-scale in effects.

    1. TSUNAMIS & STORMSJob 12:15; 14:11; 30:14
    Job mentions - massive ocean movements – associated with rapid continental drift.

    "God withholds the waters, and the sea dries up;
    He sends them out, and they overwhelm the earth.”
    “For the waters fail from the sea,
    And the [ocean] flood dries up.”
    "They come as broad breakers,
    As the wide breaking in of ocean waters;
    Under the ruinous storm they roll along."

    Also interesting is the comment in Job 7:12 that they set a watch over the sea.
    Warn of tsunami activity – give people time to escape giant waves coming in.





     
  3. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    2
    ICE‑AGE ‑ Job 38:29‑30
    "From whose womb comes the ice? ...
    The ocean waters harden like stone,
    And the surface of the deep is frozen."

    What? In the Middle-East?
    Yes! During Pleistocene ice-age – immense ice-sheets covered Europe.
    In Palestine – hail/snow/storms prevalent – sea froze in winter.
    In ice-age - large body water – in Jordan rift – Red Sea – up thro Galilee
    to Mediterranean – LakeLisan.
    This arm of the ocean – since been cut off – freeze over in winter in ice-age.
    Possible some of Mediterranean did so too.

    Usually – Middle East relatively dry.
    But during this ice-age period – massive rains and rushing water – often frustrated
    successful agriculture.
    Job mentions this in 14:19

    “The waters wear away the stones.
    Its torrents wash away the dust of the earth,
    And thus You cause destruction of a man’s hope.

    CAVEMEN ‑ Job 24:7‑8,30:3‑7
    One group from a generation earlier (fathers ofthe children taunting (Job) 30:3‑7.
    One about poor people of Job's own day 24:7‑8 ‑ society becoming established.
    Just possible ‑ one ofthese groups ‑ Neanderthals

    "They were gaunt with want and famine,
    And plucked mallow by the bushes,
    And broom tree roots for their food ...
    They lived in the clefts of the valleys,
    Their houses were the caves in the rocks,
    And they lived under the wild bushes... "

    "They spend the night naked, without clothing,
    And have no covering in the cold.
    They are wet with the showers of the mountains,
    And huddle around the rock for want of shelter.

    Eyewitness accounts to dramatic events – fits in with the general scenario.
    Giant creatures mentioned in closing chapters of book – typical of period.

    ---------------

    Hope that helps a bit. Read Job looking for evidence of these catastrophes and you get quite a different picture of the time!

    It was Job’s catastrophe which destroyed the giant, humid river valleys where the large dinosaur and dinosaur-like animals were able to live (and where the ongoing geological activity was burying some of them and fossilizing them). This is the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary which is marked as the 65 million years ago atomic dating as a massive extinction. It was definitely not the Flood of Noah and certainly not the catastrophe which sparked the language changes and massive migrations of the time of Babel.
     
  4. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    2
    Samuel, you cannot bury your head in the sand like that. Either the Bible is trustworthy or it is not. The answers are there. It takes study, but they are there. Laziness is not an excuse. My husband, like many other scientists, is a God-fearing man, a wonderful Christian, and has found that the data itself leads straight to a young creation without any need to make excuses, avoid difficult questions, or ignore passages we don't currently understand. God knows how to communicate and that is exactly what He has done in His Word. We can trust it. If we could not, then how could we trust Christ Himself, who is revealed in the Bible?
     
  5. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,512
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I always enjoy your posts, Helen, but I think you're way off here.

    There are plenty of others that believe in an old-earth interpretation of the Bible and still have a full assurance in God's word.

    The Bible is trustworthy but man's interpretation of it is not always so.

    God is so much bigger than me, I don't need to underatand everything to trust in Him and His precious gift.

    Rob
     
  6. tinytim

    tinytim <img src =/tim2.jpg>

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    11,250
    Likes Received:
    0
    I for one thank you Helen...
    I am now going to reread Job this week...

    This should be interesting.
    I had already noticed the dinosaur ref. in chapter 40, thanks for the others...
     
  7. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This post is a laugh riot...

    If you looked at the numerous pictures shown, it borders on ridiculous to say that all of these ancient peoples from all over the globe just happened to accidentally create depictions of animals that a very creative evolutionary artist would envy. Do you really think they had scientist dedicated to digging up bones and reconstructing dinosaurs for museum exhibits? If not, how exactly were all of these drawings so accurately made?

    Maybe its just your presuppostions getting in the way of honestly looking at inconvenient facts?
     
  8. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    BTW, how could dinosaurs and humans share this planet together?

    For one, its a big planet. The animals spread quickly after the flood. Saying that men and dinosaurs coexisted is not the same as saying they commonly cohabitated the exact same areas. It seems obvious that there was enough interaction after the dispersion and population increases of man that we have records of their meetings.

    Second, even the greatest of predators tends to avoid large communities of people. The Bible tells us that man had not dispersed after the flood. Maybe they stayed together and built walled cities (though no threat from human enemies is implied) for protection against extinct beasts.

    Third, few if any animals consider man prey.
     
  9. corndogggy

    corndogggy Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,108
    Likes Received:
    4
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm not saying it's totally impossible, but I doubt some of the timelines. Personally I do not think that we had refined languages and recorded history millions of years ago. We would be more advanced and we would have more historic records if that were the case. It was mentioned before that Noah probably lived 4 million years ago. The more I think about it, I just don't believe that, and I think we're talking about a timeline even further back than that.
     
  10. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The drawings aren't that old even according to secular scientists.

    You don't have to drink the Koolaid of scientists that presuppose philosophical naturalism. The only requirement for millions of years is that no naturalistic (creator-less) theory of origins can work without long ages... and indirectly because it provides a "good" argument against creationism.
     
  11. Helen

    Helen <img src =/Helen2.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Messages:
    11,703
    Likes Received:
    2
    Deacon, the Bible does not allow long ages. Both Exodus 10 AND 31 reiterate that creation took six days.

    If you subscribe to the gap theory, then you are saying there was death before Adam and Eve, and that the animals were NOT vegetarians, but that nature was truly 'red in tooth and claw.'

    This is not the creation as presented in the Bible.

    You really do have to make a choice. Either the Bible is telling the truth or it is not.

    The data point toward the truth of the Bible. It is man's interpretations of the data which do not. There is no war between true science and faith. God has not lied in His creation.
     
  12. ASLANSPAL

    ASLANSPAL New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    2,318
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love the God of mystery!

    MYSTERY ..WOW! NOW THATS A CONCEPT PERHAPS A GREAT THEOLOGICAL STUDY ON THE WORD MYSTERY AND HOW IT RELATES TO GOD AND HIS WORD.

    Perhaps God likes to hold back things from man and his tendency of puffed up arrogance as in "look! look! I figured it out!"

    Thankyou God for holding back and having mystery...that way we trust and know for sure you we come to you because of love and not fear of some crazy dinosaur theory.

    oh I see we have just got to compete against those evil scientist who are conspiring to destroy God...and so we must puff up some weird theory of a crazy scenario of adam running away from a tyrannosaurs rex because ..bingo!...dinosaurs and adam and eve just had to have lived together.

    http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1489520,00.html

    snippet:

    Some dinosaurs survived on Noah's ark. One poster explains that Noah would have chosen juvenile dinosaurs to save space. An illustration shows two green sauropods in the ark alongside more conventional elephants and lions. The final exhibit depicts the Ice Age, where the last dinosaurs existed with woolly mammoths until the cold and hunting by cavemen caused them to die out. Scientists dismiss such claims as on a par with believing in Atlantis. Yet the museum is unlikely to be seen as a major threat to mainstream science. It was put in the heart of an area where Christian attractions are a mainstay of the local economy.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    comics and comedy is guaranteed material for years to come .


    but on a serious note dinosaurs would still be alive today if not for the Flintstones pushing their immoral behavior upon them...no wonder they
    became extinct..shame on you Fred and Barney...btw that Barney is quite and actor.:smilewinkgrin:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFLn_fiSIMk


    whoops! to be fair who take this dinosaur thingy serious here is your kind of linkie
    http://www.moeh.org/main/index.htm
     
    #32 ASLANSPAL, Nov 29, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 29, 2006
  13. Scott J

    Scott J Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I see. But this holding back of things only applies to people who believe in Him and His truthfulness in the Bible... not people who have decided that supernatural creation is not true by philosophical presupposition rather than any tangible proof.

    Who proposed that weird theory here? Helen posted a link to real, hard facts. It is you that insists that we have to puff up some weird theory regardless of the facts.

    Accurate depictions of dinosaurs very often even to a reasonable proximity of scale by ancient peoples unlikely to have any knowledge or capability in paleontology... is a very strong evidence that they actually saw these creatures in person. The progressive development from realistic to fanciful over time would match the notion that the ancients had personal experience while later the drawings were based on legends derived from those observations.

    Do you have a rational explanation for the accuracy of these fairly numerous drawings if they had no personal observation of the creatures or are you content to hide behind your smug innuendo?

    Not scientists. Philosophical naturalists.
    This is actually untrue. There has been alot of noise in the establishment lately about the encroachments of creationism.

    Also some who used to advocate a dual kingdom sort of arrangement where "science" wouldn't attempt to answer religion have abandoned that position in favor of attacking supernaturalists more directly. Why? Because by their own estimation, people are accepting creation theories more than evolution.

    http://creationsafaris.com/crev200611.htm

    See the 4th story down: "[FONT=arial,sans][SIZE=+1]Nature Interviews German Creationist; Media Notes Rise of Anti-Darwinism[/SIZE][/FONT]"
     
    #33 Scott J, Nov 29, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 29, 2006
  14. Watchman

    Watchman New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks Helen for bringing this up. It would seem to be a difficult thing for the skeptics of the Genesis account of creation to answer. Also, the descriptions of a world-wide flood among different cultures.
     
  15. menageriekeeper

    menageriekeeper Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Very interesting article, Helen, thanks.

    But I have a question....

    Why would it not be possible that animals died before the fall? Where do we get the idea that death invaded the entire earth only when it began to affect man?

    Adam and Eve must have understood the word death, but how could they if they had never seen/experienced the death of something alive?
     
Loading...