Dinosaurs not on the ark?

[Reformed1689]

You're making an unfounded leap in reasoning. If Genesis were to be taken literal it brings another issue regarding the creation of Eve. If an actual rib was removed from Adam to create Eve, Adam minus a rib, would no longer be perfect.

Of course you have dodged the question. And how would Adam having a rib removed by God make him imperfect? If God made him that way, or made him to be that way, is that still not perfect in God's viewpoint?

But you dodged the issue that your viewpoint necessitates Adam and Eve to be created as babies.

But if you don't take Genesis literally what reason do you have for not doing so? There is certainly nothing linguistically that would cause someone to take this as anything but literal.

 

[Deacon]

Just checking the Ark’s manifest and not only did Noah have two, miniature dino’s but there was a years supply of Purina Dino Chow.

Rob

 

[InTheLight]

In your view then Adam and Eve must have been created as babies

But you dodged the issue that your viewpoint necessitates Adam and Eve to be created as babies.

#4. Ascribing a belief to someone and then attacking it. Analog: Mind reading.

You've really got to stop doing this.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

 

[Yeshua1]

Dinosaur hatchlings on to the ark need not pose such a problem, Genesis 6:19.

majority of Dinosaurs were chicken sized, so babies would have been no problem!

 

[Reformed1689]

#4. Ascribing a belief to someone and then attacking it. Analog: Mind reading.

You've really got to stop doing this.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk

No. If a belief necessitates something it must be pointed out and then it is up to the other party to refute/clarify. You need to understand this. I will not stop pointing out the flaws in a viewpoint so you might as well get off that horse.