Now what would the average reasonable person assume I was referring to.
Where would a server utter these words to the ones being served.
“ May I take your orders “
This in response to,
“Serving does not imply taking orders from the one served”
Serving does imply taking orders from the served.
The clear restaurant analogy was obvious, you feign ignorance of my allusion to avoid the point I was making.
You can argue black means white till you are blue in the face, it won’t change a thing.
This is what I meant about you guys, look at all the legalising of the word you have just done.
When all you had to do was accept the plain reading of scripture.
You have ended at the absurd conclusion that the server is not under obedience to the ones they serve.
Without obedience the server is not a server, and served is not the served.
This is just another redux to absurdity that legalisers do rather than accept the plain reading of scripture.
