1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Does Acts 2:38 REALLy teach water baptism requiredto be saved?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Yeshua1, Feb 28, 2014.

  1. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    woke up at 2:30 am to study. then back to bed, then up at 6 am and looked out at the San Pablo skies. gray.
    then went to this board, and my spirits are up.
    my brother is pulling some strings and having fun, and when my brother is having fun, I'm having fun.:thumbsup::laugh:
    ya gotta be baptized in order to be saved.
    why cantcha'll see that ?
     
  2. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Are you playing games with the word "saved", or are you saying that eternal salvation is by something in addition to Grace?
     
  3. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    I thought so and posted before reading the above!
     
  4. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Highly unlikely. ἑτέροις τε λόγοις πλείοσιν διεμαρτύρατο καὶ παρεκάλει αὐτοὺς λέγων Σώθητε ἀπὸ τῆς γενεᾶς τῆς σκολιᾶς ταύτης translates almost verbatim into the English form as "And by many other words he testified and exhorted them saying, 'Be saved from this crooked generation.' " as it appears in the NASB. "Save yourselves" is simply bad translation. It cannot be structured to say that.
     
  5. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Okay, I have no idea how much Greek you really know, so I have to ask. Are you aware that (1) the middle and passive voices have the same form? (2) in any basic koine Greek grammar you learn early on that "the middle voice represents the subject as acting in some way that concerns itself" (New Testament Greek for Beginners, Machen, p. 57)?

    Thus, contrary to your statements, "It cannot be structured to say that," the translation "save yourselves" is just as possible as "be saved." It is most definitely NOT a "bad translation." The rendering is up to the individual translator. Go back to your basic Greek grammar and try again.

    Translations that render "save yourselves" include: KJV, MKJV, NKJV, ESV, RSV, WEB, ASV, Montgomery, TCNT, ライフライン訳, and many others in many languages.
     
    #45 John of Japan, Mar 2, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 2, 2014
  6. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    Except for the fact that the rendering "save yourself" goes against the context, which is salvation of the sinner, not a personal action to garner safety for one's self from any earthly affliction, such as the "perverse generation" spoken of in v. 40. This is Peter's sermon in the Temple courts on the day of Pentecost. Surely you are not suggesting that, in the context of the passage, it is suggested the Peter was preaching salvation by works?
    I did. That's why I posted as I did.
    And? That fact goes back your comment, "The rendering is up to the individual translator." It may not truly be a "bad" translation, but it is less than optimum. It flirts with conflict with the concept of man's depravity making him unable to respond to the gospel without God's intervention.
     
  7. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    "Save yourselves" is a grammatically correct, but contextually incorrect rendering. The Greek word in question can be legitimately translated either as a middle or passive voice verb as both forms are the same. I prefer "be saved" over "save yourselves" but I cannot say that "save yourselves" is incorrect, grammatically. It isn't. It is, I believe, a contextually incorrect rendering of the word in question, which I believe is passive voice. But that is based on my theological understanding and not grammar. Also, the argument can be made that the intent was not to "save yourselves" in the eternal spiritual sense, but in the earthly, philosophical sense. "Get yourself out of that situation as it is potentially harmful to your fellowship (not relationship) with God."

    :)
     
  8. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Of course not. I dealt with this in a previous post.

    As I said, I dealt with this in a previous post. I don't see the "save yourselves" statement as soteriological. "Save" has a wide range of meanings in Greek, most usages not being soteriological.

    At a guess, since you didn't even seem to know what a middle voice is in Greek, you don't know Greek at all. You have good software and know how to copy and paste and consult your software lexicon. Period. Come back when you've studied it and actually understand the language.
     
  9. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,613
    Likes Received:
    2,896
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes, very perceptive of you brother, with tongue in cheek I've intentionally attempted to provoke attention from baptism to the word 'save' (sozo).
     
  10. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,613
    Likes Received:
    2,896
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I basically agree with you, except that I believe that ‘save yourselves’ is exactly correct for the context.

    I stated in an earlier post, “When Peter says, "Save yourselves", he is not saying "Send yourselves to heaven". He is saying, 'Escape the wrath to come'.” There’s nothing like applying a healthy dose of the ‘preterist modifier’ (gasp, I said that word, it’s bound to cause some convulsions) to shed light on “Save yourselves from this crooked generation” which is synonymous with:

    …Come forth, my people, out of her, that ye have no fellowship with her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: for her sins have reached even unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. Rev 18:4,5
     
    #50 kyredneck, Mar 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2014
  11. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    Interpretation of Scripture requires that one discern the difference between:

    {1}prophecy regarding the Return of Jesus Christ followed by the General Resurrection and Judgment and

    {2}prophecy related to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD!
     
    #51 OldRegular, Mar 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2014
  12. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,613
    Likes Received:
    2,896
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Heeding the included instructions is always helpful. "Seal not up the words of the prophecy of this book; for the time is at hand."
     
    #52 kyredneck, Mar 3, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 3, 2014
  13. OldRegular

    OldRegular Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    22,678
    Likes Received:
    64
    70AD wasn't far off but the rest has yet to happen!
     
  14. kyredneck

    kyredneck Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    19,613
    Likes Received:
    2,896
    Faith:
    Baptist
    JoJ, I'm really appreciating this post, you've not told me anything in general I didn't already know, what's surprising to me is just how much I'm agreeing with you.

    'Domestic duties' are keeping me occupied, I'm hoping to articulate some thoughts in your direction shortly. :)
     
  15. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You're welcome. It's always nice to agree. :wavey:

    I'll be waiting for your further comments.
     
  16. convicted1

    convicted1 Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    28
    Too much of an accord going on in here..

    Psst, Brother John, don't tell anyone I said this, but Brother KYR said your feet stink.....*****said in a whispering tone so none can hear*****:laugh::smilewinkgrin:
     
  17. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,356
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Hah! Actually, I'm built upside down: my feet smell and my nose runs. :laugh:
     
  18. Alcott

    Alcott Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    9,405
    Likes Received:
    353
    Faith:
    Baptist
    1) Because the thief on the cross to Jesus' right didn't get himself baptized, even though baptism for the remission of sins had been instigated.
    2) Because Jesus was baptized under such instigation, and he had no sins to repent of
    3) Because if someone repents and accepts Christ, and then a sniper shoots him dead when he's on the way to the baptistry, he has still believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, and is therefore saved (Acts 16:31).
     
  19. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    this is another passage that has 'thorny issues' associated with it, in that either way can be used to translate what was actually being said, bu tthen you get into a bit of "which way fits the contex being conveyed into the setting by the author?"

    And do think a BIG thing here to keep in mind who peter was adressing, the jews who formally had rejected jesus as messiah, and whose concepts of baptism were derived from the OT scriptures!
     
  20. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    IF we followed that analysis some trying to make that water baptism ties into salvation, then why not communion also, for is it not also commanded to do in obedience unto the Lord?

    refuse communion, lose salvation?
     
Loading...