Dr Malone’s personal adverse reaction to Moderna vax

"How Bad is my Batch"
The story of my vaccine injury

Robert W Malone MD, MS
Jan 13

I actually do have a personal life. In fact, my wife of of 42 years and I are actually pretty private. Sharing personal history is not something I do everyday. However, as many of you know - I was vaccinated with Moderna twice and had a pretty significant vaccine injury. This was pretty early in the roll-out of the vaccines. It was long before the FOIA Japanese pre-clinical trial data that had so many red-flags and irregularities, long before we learned of all the issues with the clinical trials, and long before the VAERs and adverse events began to be known.

I knew in the beginning of April, 2021, that I had to travel overseas and the word on the street was that the European Union was going to require full vaccination before entering any EU country by summer (that actually never happened BTW). I knew that a full vaccination protocol was a process of weeks - and that i had better get started! Furthermore, there was a lot of buzz around the idea that vaccination would help with “long-COVID.” I had already had COVID, and just couldn’t shake a number of chronic issues that I had developed after getting the disease.

In April, 2021, I got vaccinated. It was early enough in the cycle, that I had no choice but to take the Moderna vaccine, as that was available in my area.

The first shot was fine. No issues.

The second shot almost did me in. As in I almost died.

After the injection, I had the usual fatigue, muscle-ache and then the palpitations started, as well as shortness of breath. Within a couple days, it got worse - I am not someone who goes to the doctor easily, but luckily for me, I happened to have a routine appointment with my physician. She cuffed me and my systolic blood pressure was through the roof. As she is also a cardiologist, she had more tests run, started me on high blood pressure meds and we got it under control. I kind of feel like I owe her my life. A call out to the fantastic Dr. C. Bove.

Fast forward to today.

One of the people who comments on my Substack articles, pointed me to this website:

How Bad is my Batch ?

According to the website above, the data reported in VAERS, reproduced on the site, show that adverse events triggered by Moderna batches have varied widely.

• 5% of the batches appear to have produced 90% of the adverse reactions
  
  
• Some Moderna batches are associated with 50 x the number of deaths and disabilities compared to other batches.
  

With that knowledge, I entered my batch code in the search box.

Here are the results:


Now, I don’t know how many doses are in each batch. But I do know my batch was most definitely in the top 5%. So, not really a surprise in retrospect that I had such a serious adverse event profile.

I always felt I was lucky that I happened to be going to my physician that day, who is also a cardiologist (she is my internist - so I wasn’t seeing her for that specialty).

But just think- our government had this data way back when in the VAERs system -even last summer. This data is so compelling and yet…crickets. How many people could they have helped by releasing this data? People like me, who if I wasn’t a physician and hadn’t gone to my physician could have easily dropped dead.

What is wrong with our government that a site like this are not available from the CDC or the FDA?

If anyone has any doubts about adverse events from these vaccines, take a look at some of the peer reviewed research or look at the VAERS data for deaths in young adults and children.

 

The Morning Report - 1/12/22
—J.J. Sefton





Good morning, kids. Wednesday and I guess you can file this one in the "if it walks like a duck" file. Let's start off with this little item that should cause you no concern whatsoever:

A federal agency debuted a new system on Tuesday designed to record and store the information of federal employees who requested religious exemptions from the Biden administration's federal jab mandate.
According to a report by the Daily Signal, the Pretrial Services Agency for the District of Columbia, an independent federal agency designed to aid Washington D.C. courts, created the "Employee Religious Exception Request Information System" to track unvaccinated employees who ask for religious exemptions from President Joe Biden's federal [Chinese] COVID-19 shot mandate.

The Federal Register describes the new system as the best way to keep track of "personal religious information" that is collected "in the context of a public health emergency or similar health and safety incident, such as a pandemic, epidemic, natural disaster or national or regional emergency and/or any other lawful collection of employee information or data that is necessary to ensure a safe and healthy environment for individuals." Those with concerns about the system only have until Feb. 10 to offer any public comments.

The agency claims that the database will legally allow for the "collection, storing, dissemination, and disposal of employee religious exemption request information" for an indefinite period of time.



No, not creepy at all! Is it just me or did you too read that as "Pre-CRIME Services Agency?"………..

……….Psaki-Psircling back to my opening contention about the nature of this post, I give you the estimable Lloyd Billingsley:

In National Socialist Germany, Jews were the primary disfavored class. In the United States and allied nations today, the unvaccinated, or anyone critical of government health policies, find themselves increasingly vilified, disfavored, and even threatened.
"This is a pandemic of the unvaccinated," Joe Biden said in September. The unvaccinated "can cause a lot of damage -- and they are," and Biden has a plan "to combat those blocking public health." As the Delaware Democrat warned, "we've been patient but our patience is wearing thin," so "get vaccinated."

If that does not convey disfavored status it's hard to imagine what might. Maybe a yellow star would do the trick, but to adapt what Marlon Brando said in "On the Waterfront" there's "a lot more" to this Nazi comparison business than people might think.

The primary author of Biden's 3,548-word message was doubtless chief White House medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci. Biden has joked that Fauci is the real president, but that might understate the matter.

Fauci, a government bureaucrat since 1968 and head of the NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, has never faced a vote of the people. The president must deal with Congress, which controls spending. With his budget of more than $6 billion, Fauci controls a great deal of medical research spending, even as he lays down public health policy. On top of all that, Fauci can boast the ultimate strategic ally.

His wife, Christine Grady, heads up bioethics at the National Institutes of Health, including NIH's work with "human subjects." It is as though Nancy Reagan served as a special counsel for President Ronald Reagan, and greenlighted the Iran-Contra scandal. . .

. . ."Nazi Germany brought the difficult issues in research with human subjects to the attention of the public and medical/scientific communities," Grady writes. "In the name of 'experimentation,' human torture and atrocities were performed on thousands of Jews and justified as medical research."

Josef Mengele, the most notorious Nazi doctor, goes unmentioned, but "Dr. Klaus Karl Schilling infected more than 1,000 prisoners at Dachau with malaria without their consent." The experiments exposed at the Nuremberg trials "forced an examination of human research," and "the medical profession was aware that serious breaches of ethics had occurred in the past." The author moves on to Thalidomide, released in the 1950s as a remedy for morning sickness in pregnant women.

Thalidomide was "thought to be exceptionally safe," Grady writes, but left "thousands of children with severe and unusual deformities" such as hands attached to shoulders, feet attached to hips and so forth. "The harm done was the result of inadequate research," according to Grady, who needed to conduct more adequate research on this subject.

Thalidomide was the product of Chemie Grunenthal and the subject of a court case in 1970. A name on the original patent was Dr. Heinrich Muckter, the company's head of research and a Nazi war criminal who conducted medical experiments in prison camps. In the 1970s, Grunenthal appointed as the chairman of their board Otto Ambros, the inventor of sarin nerve gas who was jailed for mass murder at Auschwitz.



Billingsley's essay is a rebuttal to Dan Gelernter's bristling at those comparing Fauci and his handling of Chinese COVID as akin to what the Nazis did. And it's a helluva rebuttal as this excerpt shows. But it goes wider and deeper than that as I have tried to lay out. While I was about to say there are no concentration camps here in the former USA - yet - we have people held as political prisoners for a staged false flag "insurrection" one year ago. We have the move to criminalize political dissent of any variety as domestic terrorism. We have naked, shameless attempts to make election rigging of the kind that overturned the actual results of 2020 legal and permanent. We have blacklisting within the private sector as legal, acceptable and almost a requirement for businesses insofar as preventing anyone from being employed who does not openly and full-throated embrace whatever insane, radical diversity agenda a company might have.

As a child of a survivor of real, actual Nazis, I am particularly sensitive to the use of that word. Take it from me; everything we are experiencing right now is, with slight variations here and there, a very close mirror to what happened in Germany before Schickelgruber took power as well as in almost any other totalitarian regime that gradually, and subversively, came into being.

This is a wake-up call for anyone with eyes to see and a mind to reason. Think it can't happen here? It's happening as we speak. Tick tock. . .