1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Electoral College

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Salty, Nov 13, 2007.

?
  1. Do away with college - President should be voted by Congress

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Do away with college - President should be voted by popular vote

    7 vote(s)
    21.2%
  3. Keep the College as it is

    16 vote(s)
    48.5%
  4. Keep the College - but Electors should be pro-rated by state

    4 vote(s)
    12.1%
  5. Keep College - Electors should be selected by congressigonal district

    4 vote(s)
    12.1%
  6. Other

    2 vote(s)
    6.1%
  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    23,776
    Likes Received:
    397
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What do you think of the Electoral College
     
  2. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think of a good system to keep the big states from making the smaller states irrelevant in a presidential election.
     
  3. bobbyd

    bobbyd New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the Founding Fathers had it right...the ones who want to do away with the EC are generally those who disagree with recent elections.
     
  4. North Carolina Tentmaker

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    One of the things I like about the EC is that it takes the factor of voter turn out away from the results. State by state voter turn out which could be effected by weather or other things is not a factor.
     
  5. Palatka51

    Palatka51 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    The EC is an established compromise between some of the original Constitutional Convention who advocated that the Executive Office should be elected by the Senate and a group that suggested a straight up 1 person, 1 vote election for President. The delegates of the original CC were very suspicious of total democracy and wanted each state to have a say as to who would be the Chief Executive.
     
  6. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    79
    Keep College - Electors should be selected by congressional district - with the two extra electoral votes going to the winner of the statewide popular vote.
     
  7. StefanM

    StefanM Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    7,108
    Likes Received:
    145
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That sounds like a winner to me!
     
  8. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    23,776
    Likes Received:
    397
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I lived in West Virginia for a couple of years. They have 5 congressman. All were democrats. If 40 % of the state vote for the Republician, then they should get 40% of the EC votes (which would amount to 2) That is the reason I do not like the ideal of winner take all in a congressional distirct. Also, if a district is mainly one party, then voters in that district may not vote.

    I do agree that the two "Senate" EC votes should go to the statewide winner
     
  9. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    That seems a reasonable proposal.
     
  10. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about proportional EC votes to match the state popular vote?
     
  11. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    23,776
    Likes Received:
    397
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Exactally my point!:thumbs:
     
  12. Ivon Denosovich

    Ivon Denosovich New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    <Going out on a limb>

    I dislike the EC for the same reason that I dislike the philosophical justification for affirmative action. I don't see it as a proper function of the govt. to determine the worth of an individual's contribution to society be that as opinion, labor, or anything else. If I move to WY the real value of my vote would increase, decrease if I moved to NY, and stay the same peradventure I do. Regardless of the fact that neither my IQ, biases, grasp of the issues, or even public concern would fluctuate the value of my vote certainly would. Similarly, if I underwent gender reassignment I'm sure I'd "qualify" for more jobs (and perhaps higher salary) than I do now-- but through no fault of my own!!! Also:

    </limb>
     
  13. Dagwood

    Dagwood New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    399
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think we should keep the electoral college as is.
     
  14. KenH

    KenH Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    32,694
    Likes Received:
    21
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Our Founding Fathers got this right. Leave it as is.
     
  15. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Likes Received:
    1
    Without the EC, New York, California, Texas, Florida, and Ill. would elect the president and control the nation. None of the rest of the states would matter in any national election.
     
  16. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is room to change within the Constitutional framework of the electoral college. The idea of giving all EC votes to a candidate with a popular plurality is only practiced by 48 states.

    Each state has the right to decide how these votes are distributed. I think a reflection of the popular vote as close as you can get it is much better than winner take all.
     
  17. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is my view,too. The FF had a good idea, but now that candidates can freely travel to all states and all voters can have access to candidates via tv, internet, media, then there should be more voter count. However, a popular election of president is just not workable. The candidates would ignore smaller states altogether.

    The only other plan I'd advocate is a tier-ed state system of the EC. That is, have 4 levels - Each level gets X number of ec votes. California, NY, Ill, Fla, could be in the top tier. Each of them gets the same number of EC votes. Next tier would get slightly less. So on and so on. You would have the larger states get more EC votes, but no larger state would be worth more than another. That would make more states competitive and make the parties less likely to write off certain states.
     
    #17 TomVols, Nov 17, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 17, 2007
  18. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    23,118
    Likes Received:
    547
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Like it or not, It is here to stay.
     
  19. NaasPreacher (C4K)

    NaasPreacher (C4K) Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Messages:
    26,806
    Likes Received:
    79
    That sounds like one of the voting plans for the European Parliament
     
  20. church mouse guy

    church mouse guy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2002
    Messages:
    11,580
    Likes Received:
    151
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We have a good republic; the system works well as is. Let's end abortion or do something important.
     
Loading...