Following the moderators rules?

av1611jim · Nov 5, 2004

I noticed that in the ten most recent threads as of 11:28 p.m. MST that there seems to be a deviation from the rules of this forum. This deviation is primarily the fault of they who oppose "KJV-onlyism".
While this is not intended as a flame; I do have a simple question.
Dr.Bob in his KJVO definitions post states that folks should refer to the KJVO and #1-5 when refuting or discussing the doctrine.
I see this is not being done.
Can anybody remind me why this is not happening?
Just a curious ol' boy from the mountains.

In His service;
Jim

Pastor_Bob · Nov 5, 2004

To categorize the KJVO is not a posting rule in this forum. It is a helpful addition when describing a KJVO philosophy that you are trying to debate. If you'll notice, the thread entitled, Eleven Simple Rules for Posting, says nothing about ascribing a number to the KJVO belief you are confronting. That idea is presented in the thread entitled, Definitions of KJV Only.

Dr. Bob · Nov 5, 2004

Most make a simpler distinction between
KJV is preferred
KJV is best
KJV is only
and it is evident in the post.

I only pick up stones when folks cross 4 to 5 . .

Following the moderators rules?

av1611jim New Member

Pastor_Bob Well-Known Member

Dr. Bob Administrator
Administrator

Useful Searches

Following the moderators rules?

av1611jim New Member

Pastor_Bob Well-Known Member

Dr. Bob Administrator Administrator

Dr. Bob Administrator
Administrator