Following the Science and Pandemic Policy Outcomes

[KenH]

“What does it mean for politicians to follow the science when scientists disagree and the policy outcomes might give us unintended consequences? Jeff Singer comments.”

Following the Science and Pandemic Policy Outcomes

 

[Alan Gross]

It means it is was all a political biological hoax.

 

[Wingman68]

I agree with Alan. This entire plandemic was designed & released to give the globalists total control, not just of our country, but our country was/is their biggest stumbling block on that path. Things were going too well with Trump to expect him to lose a general election. They needed help. This came in the win/win form of global fear, & ridding the world of useless baggage taking up their precious green space. Trump put forward the top ranking expert, Fauci. Did he always advocate masks? No. On again, off again. The expert. We can’t do anything different until the vaccine, but we will not accept any vaccine under Trump. We can’t defeat covid while Trump is there is what my ignorant governor says. Double bonus with the virus, it encourages mail vote fraud. You better expect an uptick in virus’s from now on. They so love the fear & control.

 

[Deacon]

Scientists always disagree early in the game of discovery.
This pandemic is still new, we are only beginning to learn effective methods of treating it.

By chance, some politicians will make a right choice in following a particular scientists advice.
But the politician is making a political decision not a scientific one... science is proven over time.

Rob

 

[SavedByGrace]

I like the KJV on the term "science"

" O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called" (1 Timothy 6:20)