Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I understand her frustration. Since it was her flags and her private property (off post) I hope she does not get punished.
I suspect this display, intended to be a sign of distress, will become much more common if Obama does not back off.
I don't know why it wouldn't be both a protest and a sign of distress.
Back during Vietnam this 'sign of protest' was seen as almost treasonous by the right.
How things have changed.
Back during Vietnam this 'sign of protest' was seen as almost treasonous by the right.
How things have changed.
You're right. It was seen that way. I am sure in many cases it was. We'd have to look at the cases individually to know for sure.
Hanging it upside down because you are opposed to a war being fought overseas is one thing. I believe it is treason to aide and abet our enemies. Being their voice here and abroad is an example this. Jane Fonda, John Kerry, and many others in our media are guilty of this, IMO.
Hanging it upside down because of attacks stateside is another thing. Since our oath is to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic I believe it is not treason to hang the flag upside down in a time of direct attack from our own government.
It's incorrect to call what Kerry or others did "treason." Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]."
In other words you have to do something such as bearing arms against your parent country or assist a foreign government in overthrowing the country.
Maybe their actions couldn't be prosecuted, but opposing points can't have equal validity unless they're both wrong. Where one is descrating the flag in support of a communist revolution, and another is flying the flag upside down to protest the violence being done to the Constitution, one is right and the other wrong.Those who did this during Vietnam had just a valid a point as this soldier in the OP .
There are many ways to do violence against a person or a nation. Nothing in the definition you posted demands a physical weapon to be used.
From the article: "Flying a flag upside down is considered a sign of distress, and Section 176 of Chapter 10, Title 36 in the U.S. Code of Laws, referred to as the U.S. Flag Code, says the flag should be flown upside down only in “instances of extreme danger to life or property.”"
I'm conflicted by this. Though I agree with the sentiment of the individual, I'm not sure that the reason doesn't cheapen the act of flying the Flag upside down; that is to say, I'm not sure that it's appropriate to do so for political reasons.