Joseph_Botwinick
<img src=/532.jpg>Banned
LeBuick said:Isn't being relevant to the audiance following the example set by Jesus? I always thought it was. When he spoke to fishermen he usually spoke about fishing, mending the nets etc... When he spoke to farmers he spoke about planting seeds, seperating wheat from tare etc... He knew those words would penetrate that audiance.
You wouldn't give a baby steak, but if you chew it up for them and place a small piece in the mouth you have given them something they can handle.
LeBuick,
You raised a very good question here. Certainly, Jesus spoke in a manner that some of the people could understand and accept. There were other times, however, when Jesus spoke in a manner that was counter-culture and offensive to the culture. Calling the Religious Leaders Snakes and applying the Words of Isaiah to them about them paying lip service to God was certainly not a seeker sensitive way of reaching out to them and being relevant to them. Neither did Jesus go on fact finding surveys to find out why the Lost had a hard time accepting the truth and then repackage the truth to suit them. It wasn't a matter of marketing to felt needs with him. It was a matter of addressing the actual needs for them. I imagine had Jesus taken a survey and tried to be relevant to the felt needs of the culture, he probably would have been putting together an earthly army that would have overthrown the Roman Empire, and certianly would not have spent so much time talking about Spiritual things. Even to the very end, Peter did not understand the concept that Jesus had come to die for his sins, not liberate him from the Roman Empire.
Joseph Botwinick
Last edited by a moderator: