1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured How is God a Just God AND a Savior?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by KenH, Nov 26, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There are several reasons why your interpretation is wrong. The simplest one is this. The word for sin, hamartian, is used twice in the same sentence; it would be very odd if it had two different meanings, but to say that "He has made Him who knew no sin offering to be a sin offering for us" makes no sense. If the Holy Spirit has wanted to say 'sin offering' on the second use of hamartian, He could have used prosphora peri hamartias as in Hebrews 10:18.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I think this is absolutely true, and if Mr Parker thinks so then he is entirely right to state it in the clearest possible way. He has not said that those who disagree with him are going to hell, but that there is only one way that God has decreed for the salvation of guilty sinners. Whether people who don't believe it are damned is a matter for God, not for us, but preachers have a duty to preach the truth in the clearest possible terms and that is what Mr Parker has done. Good for him!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This is true as far as we know of Pastor Parker. He made only the error of belaying that h8s interpretation was the only one that presented God as just and justifier.

    But it is not true of Ken equating Parker's understanding of imputation as the gospel of Jesus Christ.

    I believe there is only one gospel and it is the power of God unto salvation to all who believes.

    If somebody rejects the gospel of Jesus Christ then we KNOW they are lost. It is not a matter known only to God.

    To say one must believe Parkers understanding of imputation as the gospel is a false statement (that is itself "another gospel", adding to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
     
  4. RipponRedeaux

    RipponRedeaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2019
    Messages:
    2,094
    Likes Received:
    302
    Faith:
    Baptist
    JonC, the words above were addressed to you. Was Paul overstating his case? Of course not. Should there be different interpretations? Of course not. The Bible isn't silly putty. It's not malleable.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Martin Marprelate

    Martin Marprelate Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,817
    Likes Received:
    2,106
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why do you not add, "But of course this is only my belief and there may be lots of Gospels"?
    You just said that it was your belief. Why are you committing to hell people who don't share your beelief?
    So we can disagree with Mr Paerker's understanding, but not yours. :rolleyes:
    I have only made this post to show how silly your position is. I don't intend to discuss it further.
     
  6. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Where in what I posted by Bill Parker does he state that one must understand EVERYTHING about Biblical doctrine to be saved? Where in what I posted by Bill Parker does he state that one must have EVERY SINGLE ONE of his theological ducks in a row in order to be saved? He doesn't. I submit, sir, that you have created a straw man argument.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Since you asked, here are a few questions(not saying this is a complete list, just some that come readily to mind):

    Do you understand that you are a sinner and that regardless of how moral or sincere or kind you might be, that you cannot stand guiltless before God on that basis? Do you understand that all of the conditions for salvation were fulfilled by Christ alone, that there is nothing that you can think or perform to make yourself accepted by God, that there are no conditions for you to meet since Christ met them all? Do you understand that you cannot create a righteousness of your own that is acceptable to God, that you must have a righteousness outside of yourself - the righteousness of Christ, the Lord our Righteousness? Do you understand that you MUST look to God to save you - that salvation starts with God and ends with God - and that you are incapable of adding anything to that? Do you understand that the standard is PERFECT RIGHTEOUSNESS, not "sincere obedience"? Wherefore, do you understand that faith and repentance from dead works are gifts from God and His almighty power and not something you can do or contribute to because there is something innately good or responsive in yourself?

    Please note, that I did not ask you about imputation or election or a whole host of other doctrinal issues. I asked you about a sinner and how he sees himself before a perfectly holy God and where the perfect righteousness necessary for a sinner to stand guiltless before God is found. Most religious people try to establish their own righteousness, and that effort is doomed to always fail. Submitting to the righteousness of God is what all of God's elect will be enabled by God's power to do.
     
    #47 KenH, Nov 29, 2022
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2022
    • Winner Winner x 3
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why? I never called him a liar.

    I believe he honestly does not understand how others present God as just and justifier.
     
  9. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Do I understand that? Yes.

    I was merely pointing out that there are several competing interpretations of God's Word that present God as just and justifier, pointing out the fact that Pastor Parker overstated his position.

    I was not saying Parkers position was wrong, only that he made an error in writing that it was the only interpretation meeting the criteria he set forth.

    He skipped defending his position by simply saying it was the only possible interpretation that presented God as just and justifier (a logical fallacy, but in that category because it is not uncommon).
     
  10. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Strawman argument.

    I never said that Bill Parker equated positions that do not follow his understanding of the gospel ad another gospel.

    I said that you did.

    I think Parker simply overstated (he was emphasizing his position, but in so doing made a false statement there there exists no other interpretation throughout Christian thought that presents God as just and justifier....that his understanding was the only one that exists).

    We all believe our understanding correct. But to simply deny that other interpretations of God being just and justifier exist is wrong.

    But it was you, not Parker, that equated Parker's understanding of the gospel to the gospel of Jesus Christ itself.
     
  11. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I am going to clarify as it appears my argument is being twisted out of context.

    I am not arguing against the position in the OP.

    I am pointing out that there are several interpretations of Scripture that give the glory to Christ and present God as just and justifier.

    When we argue positions it is a bit silly to support your position by denying the existence of others.

    We do not benefit from doing that.

    The proper argument should be "I believe ... and think it the best interpretation because ....".

    Saying "my understanding is the only one" is simply a baseless claim that avoids true investigation.
     
  12. AustinC

    AustinC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2020
    Messages:
    10,911
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Faith:
    Baptist
    When the plain sense makes common sense, seek no other sense.
    ~ Golden Rule of Interpretation

    Throwing in other views, just because one doesn't like what the text declares does not give the alternate view any merit. It only serves to stir up doubt where there should be no doubt.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Because there is not many gospels.

    People have different interpretations of Scripture, and different views of the effects of the gospel. Sone believe the gospel results in imputed righteousness (Pastor Parker and me) for example. Others don't.

    But if a person is saved then they have repented and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ (ONE gospel).

    I am not committing people to Hell. God tells us that there is one Way, one Gospel. If a man denies the gospel of Jesus Christ then that man will perish.

    You can say all day long that we cannot know tge fate of people who deny Christ and reject His gospel. That does not make it so.

    People can reject other people's understanding. People can disagree on many doctrines associated with the gospel. But Christians believe in the same gospel of Christ or they are not Christian at all.
    I never claimed that my understanding is the only position that presents God as just and justifier.

    That is what I was arguing against.

    Of course not. You are the king of "hit and run" arguments.

    You post strawman arguments and end with "I'm not discussing the strawman I just tossed out there".

    I expect nothing less.
     
  14. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,567
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The problem is there is no common "plain sense".

    For example, I believe the plain sense of "Christ died for our sins" is that it is for our sins that Christ died. Others believe the plain sense is that Christ died for our sins instead of us.

    When men say "the plain meaning" they are simply leaning on their own understanding, trusting in their human ability rather than God.
     
  15. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So do you believe there are different versions of the gospel of Christ?
     
  16. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Christ did die for the sins of God's elect instead of the elect, in their place.

    But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. (emphasis mine)

    Notice, the Scriptures say that He died for us - for actual people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I suggest you read more of what Bill Parker has written or listen to some of his sermons on YouTube or SermonAudio. You seem to think that one small thing of his writings that I posted is the only thing Bill has ever written or said.
     
  18. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You disagree with the Scriptures - 1 Corinthians 14:33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
     
  19. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sounds like if there had been a public message board back in the 1st century A.D. that you would have been on it and blasting away at the apostle John, since you seem to think there can be various views and ideas called the doctrine of Christ.

    1 John 1:9-10 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds. (emphasis mine)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. KenH

    KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    41,996
    Likes Received:
    1,488
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Apparently, @JonC expects anyone who states a position must immediately, at the same time, in the same sermon or in the same article, explain that there are a bunch of wrong views floating around and explain what they are and why they are wrong.

    When one declares the truth from God's Word, he is not under any obligation whatsoever to explain what is wrong with every other view.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...