1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact..?

Discussion in 'Creation vs. Evolution' started by KeyserSoze, Jan 8, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    Well, here's what you can do then..
    Read Padian's court testimony, and then show us the evidence here that demonstrates where he's wrong..
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What species has ever demonstrated change to another then?
     
  3. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Flowers still are flowers, birds still birds, human and apes different, when was there shown change again?
     
  4. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    No, once again thats a creationist distortion..
    In reality, Creationists never submit material for peer review on creationism..
    Thats because they never have anything to submit,
     
  5. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    You do understand that we have OBSERVED speciation..
    Plants, Birds, Insects, etc..
    New species for all the time.. Do some research into allopatric speciation..
     
  6. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We have those holding to Intelligent design and creationism holding same degrees from same places as evolutionists, so its not due to being dumb or uninformed!
    Newton held to creator God, would say that he was smarter than you or any other evolutionist could name today!
     
  7. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Still at dna core stayed flowers, birds bugs, need to show where bugs became birds!
     
  8. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,505
    Likes Received:
    1,242
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The pitfall if using the authority of the Bible to support a position that has flimsy empirical evidence is that when enough evidence is gathered against the position, the claim of inerrancy is shaken.

    If my faith is based upon holding firm to a young earth interpretation because I believe that is what the Bible says, then I will hold the position even when evidences are presented to the contrary.

    I think that’s where some Christian are. They grasp at weak arguments presented by organizations that are experts dancing around and twisting data to their position.

    But if our faith is in God alone, understanding that information/evidence/data we collect will help us to understand more of our creation, our faith will stand sure, not rocked by shaky theories that pop up on both sides of the equation.

    Rob
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Useful Useful x 1
  9. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is all speculation and theoretical models nothing confirmed.
     
  10. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    No, we're not..
    Its simple physics.. Radiation creates heat.. We can measure how much elements have decayed on this planet, and the resulting heat that would be generated by that decay.
    If you attempt to condense 4.5 billion years of decay down into a 6000 year timeframe, that means you have to increase the amount of heat generated by that decay..
    That resulting heat would have kept the planet entirely molten if all this decay occurred in only 6 to 10,000 years.
     
  11. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    You do understand the concept of "OBSERVED speciation"..?
     
  12. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    First, we cannot have faith in God without scripture. Second, it seems that there are some who when the word "science" is attached to something believe it is unassailable. Somehow science cannot be wrong or biased ever and what is found can never be misunderstood. Only scripture can be misunderstood.

    Scripture does not give us a date or time of creation but we can deduce that it is far from millions of years ago. We believe in a literal Adam and Eve because those passages which tell of them are historical and Moses and Jesus treated them as such. What is weak is the arguments for evolution.

    The evolutionary field is rather homogeneous. It does not tolerate any questioning of evolution as being legitimate for when someone does they are ostracized from the scientific community. The field is ripe with distorted facts, ignoring evidence that does not lead toward evolution, and in some cases down right dishonesty.
     
  13. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You do realize I quoted you when you said "allopatric speciation"
     
  14. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    Well stated Rob..
    People like Ken Ham of AiG have come to the realization that science holds an enormous amount of clout in our society.
    Hes watched for years as people abandoned YEC because of the scientific evidence that makes his beliefs untenable.
    So ultimately, he has reasoned that if he wants to stop that trend, then he needed to claim that his beliefs had scientific merit.
    So he distorts every science we have to try and convince the layman that such young earth ideas have some scientific merit.
    Had he just said, "i believe the earth is young because i think my Interpretation of scripture says so", no one would care..
    But that's not what he does.. because if he just left it to faith alone, the exodus from YECism would cause it to "go extinct"..
     
  15. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    There is a reason why science is held in such high regard.. Its because IT WORKS..
    It gets results. People figured out ages ago that if you want RESULTS, you accept pure science.
    That's why we don't teach alchemy.. Or astrology, etc.
    Ages ago, people thought that infection was caused by demonic possession..
    So patients looked to their Bibles, & anointed their heads with oil and prayed to be healed.. And yet, they still died..
    Now, along comes science.. they discover germ theory.. Antibiotics are created and infection deaths plummet..
    Science WORKS.. yet in your mind, we should abandon what works just because you wanna go back to the days of anointing your head..
    If you think the science is wrong, stop "claiming" its wrong.. get your butt into a lab and conduct the tests that SHOW its wrong.
     
  16. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Can't be done. The current scientific community would never allow any finding to come to the light of day. You don't trust the bible and I do not trust scientists for the most part.
     
  17. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2019
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    5
    Faith:
    Seeking Christ
    Horse manure.
    people don't get famous in science for maintaining the status quo. They get famous by overturning the prevailing ideas.
    Einstein got famous for showing where Newton got it wrong.
    Alfred Wegener revolutionized Geology when he came across plate tectonics (no one in geology wanted that idea to be true.. lol)
    And Darwin altered Creationism..
    You dont make your mark in history agreeing with everyone else.. You get your butt in a lab and prove them wrong with EVIDENCE until they have no choice but to accept it.. Just as Alfred Wegener did..
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,013
    Likes Received:
    3,649
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So your argument is unless we are willing to get in a lab we should just shut up and believe them no matter what?
     
  19. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Actually, you are. You are challenging what he has said.
    You are making a lot of assumptions here.

    You are making assumptions. For example, you are assuming the earth was not created with maturity. Was Adam a baby or an adult? Oh right, you don't believe Adam existed....
     
  20. Reformed1689

    Reformed1689 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2019
    Messages:
    9,903
    Likes Received:
    1,820
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ICR, AIG, and more.

    See above.

    Apparently the Court was wrong, see above.

    Again, see above.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...