1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Is the SBC really Baptist?

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by 12strings, Apr 10, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jon, has your church officially adopted the BF&M too?
    Is this something that is common in the denomination? Is it encouraged?
     
  2. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,497
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    We have accepted the BF&M. Prospective members are required to attend a class explaining our doctrine (held, I believe, quarterly on a Sunday afternoon) and are encouraged to attend a course (6 wk) that examines the BF&M. It is actually required before one can attend some of the theological studies that are offered during the week.

    What I like about it is that one knows, up front, where the church stands on certain issues as well as the character of the church. We joined the church last year, and this has been our first experience with a church that wants to make sure a prospective member knows its beliefs. (I recall being told that if I have issues with the church doctrine, it is not necessarily a reflection of my faith – but that I need to be aware of the church’s stance).

    I wouldn’t say that it is encouraged to adopt the BF&M as one’s statement of faith – I’m not sure who would be doing the encouraging. Normally I just see on some site that a particular chruch accepts the BF&M - but it is not necessarily their "statement of faith."
     
  3. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Huh? What is the difference between 'accepting' the BF&M and and adopting it as a statement of faith?
     
  4. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,497
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    A chruch may believe the BF&M, and may accept the BF&M - but as a statement of faith? I'm not sure that the BF&M in its entirety is a "statement of faith" even if you agree with it.

    Do you not see a difference in the beliefs on the link provided previouisly and the BF&M? My understanding is that we affirm the BF&M, and have our statement of faith posted.
     
  5. Jerome

    Jerome Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,796
    Likes Received:
    700
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Tom, did your church have its own statement of faith before there was a BF&M, then replaced it with the BF&M?

    It sounds like Jon's church still has its own statement of faith as well as the BF&M being 'accepted'/'affirmed'?

    Have I got this straight?
     
  6. TCGreek

    TCGreek New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    7,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is denominational, and there is denominationalism. I'm wary of the latter.
     
  7. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,497
    Likes Received:
    3,568
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As far as me, yes, that is my understanding. If you look at our church information, there is nothing confirming the BF&M, only our statement of belief (with an explanation of our doctrines concerning baptism and the Lord’s Supper separate). But as a church, the pastoral leadership states that we affirm the BF&M and goes to lengths to insure potential members are aware of our beliefs.


    I actually would prefer it be more prominent to the public eye. If you look at our website you wouldn’t be able to confirm that it is a Southern Baptist church. It does seem that many Southern Baptist churches tend to downplay its association with the SBC (at least, it doesn’t advertise it). Personally I think that it is marketing, and I would prefer an affirmation of the BF&M on our homepage. Perhaps this discussion provides the reason it is not.
     
    #47 JonC, Apr 11, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 11, 2012
  8. Tom Butler

    Tom Butler New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2005
    Messages:
    9,031
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't think we had a written statement of faith. I never saw one, at any rate. We finally got around to approving a church constitution and by-laws in the early 1980s. The BF&M was included as reflecting our doctrinal stance in general. We purposely did not deal with eschatology because there was no consensus at the time.
     
  9. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    Often many churches create their own statement of faith and affirm the BFM, though note they are not bound by this common confession. Thus the BFM acts as a unifying confessional document discussing the parameters of cooperation but not dictating what individual member bodies must believe.

    But again, none of the uniquely disqualifies the Southern Baptist Covention from being Baptist.
     
  10. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    A bit nettlesome of a point, don't you think?
     
  11. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sounds to me like your church does not affirm soul liberty, a key baptist principle. E.Y. Mullins probably couldn't be a member of your church, were he alive today.
     
  12. 12strings

    12strings Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,743
    Likes Received:
    0
    Does anyone have a good historical definition, and/or examples of "soul liberty" that E.Y. Mullins is supposed to have adheared to. Here's why I ask.

    If, according to Tom's descriptions, his church does NOT affirm soul liberty, than there are ZERO real christian churches that affirm soul liberty. All Baptist churches AT LEAST say you need to be baptized. Even the most "soul-liberarian" Baptist church is not going to hire a Roman Catholic Pastor.

    I Just don't see how the supposed idea of "soul liberty" could really work.

    -andy
     
  13. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How do you define term "Soul Liberty?"

    My understanding is that local Baptist churches,even those belonging to groups such as SBC/NAB etc still adhere to their own local
    churches statement of beliefs?
     
  14. preachinjesus

    preachinjesus Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,406
    Likes Received:
    101
    I challenge that soul liberty is a historical baptist distinctive.
     
  15. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    #55 Michael Wrenn, Apr 12, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 12, 2012
  16. nodak

    nodak Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    16
    When I first became a Southern Baptist, soul competency was THE key Baptist teaching.

    Briefly, it is the idea each person is able to come to faith in Christ for salvation without a human mediator, and is able under the guidance of the Holy Spirit to read and understand the Scripture.

    You don't go to church to be told what to believe. You find a church that teaches what you see in the Bible.

    Or so we believed.

    These days the SBC leadership seems to want us to come to church so they can tell us what to believe.

    It is totally not an issue of whether or not we agree with what they teach.

    It is totally an issue of whether or not we must have a human mediator to stand between us and God.

    Shurden's book is excellent. So is "The Axioms of Religion" by E. Y. Mullins if you want to understand what has changed.
     
  17. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    the leadership in SBC also trying to steer back towards more "reformed" salvation thinking, Eh?
     
  18. Michael Wrenn

    Michael Wrenn New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2000
    Messages:
    4,319
    Likes Received:
    0

    Exactly; I agree with everything you said because it is historical and factual.

    And that's why I said that E. Y. Mullins, a towering figure in 20th Century Southern Baptist life, could not be a Southern Baptist today. And Herschel Hobbs probably couldn't, either!

    Today's SBC has become increasingly authoritarian, creedal, exclusivist, an in denial of historic Baptist distinctives.
     
  19. Ed B

    Ed B Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2010
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    No. First of all most Calvinists in the SBC are not reformed in the purest sense. At most a minority of the leadership would claim to be 5-point Calvinists and I haven't read of any effort by them to make that a test of fellowship in the convention. There is a minority on the other side who are concerned (unnecessarily) that an increase in Calvinism within the SBC will result in missions being neglected. But no, there is no plot or grand scheme among SBC leadership to turn the convention into Particular Baptists.
     
  20. Crabtownboy

    Crabtownboy Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    18,441
    Likes Received:
    259
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I was talking with a friend recently who knows a lot of SBC folk. He said he was saddened when a relatively highly placed young man in a state association that he had just met for the first time said, "Nothing of any importance happened in the SBC before 1989."
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...