Ivermectin, a Godsend

I did not think you specifically meant to be insulting or anything, Jon, but your response assumes that doctors are always pure and unbiased in their courses of treatment. Now, especially, their credibility is seriously in doubt. All it takes is a wider spectrum of research to see that the medical business today is seriously coopted by threats or inducements to follow that party line.

I continue to be amazed how some countries - esp. the US - are making it so hard to get IVM and HCQ in order to push that pernicious Remdesivir.

BTW, have you read "The Real Anthony Fauci". It is a real eye-opener.

 

Yes. Why do more people not see this?

 

Yes, there are both controlled study trials as well as national-level trials. Several are cited in the book I referenced. Several countries have been doing quite well in their repurposing Ivermectin for the current outbreaks. Here is just one example I came across just this morning from the aforementioned book:

"Based on this study, on May 8, 2020, Peru—then under siege by a crushing COVID endemic— adopted ivermectin in its national guidelines. “Peruvian doctors already knew the medicine, widely prescribed it for parasites, and health authorities knew it was safe and were comfortable with it,” recalls Dr. Pierre Kory. COVID deaths dropped precipitously—by 14-fold—in the regions where the Peruvian government effectively distributed ivermectin. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states. In December 2020, Peru’s new president, under pressure from WHO, severely restricted IVM availability and COVID cases rebounded with deaths increasing 13-fold."

Page 64, "The Real Anthony Fauci"

Ivermectin works. Especially when applied in early stages. Fauci, in his studies of IVM, purposefully only used it on very late-term sufferers from Covid, setting it up thus for very poor results.

 

Source? I have read the opposite.

 

The results on a national level have much more validity than some easily-manipulated study done by corrupt scientists.
But, if you want, you can find several of what you want in the book I cited.

But if you are "only interested in the controlled studies" then I think I have nothing really to add. Other than, maybe, to ask why the successful results of several countries does not interest you.

 

Yes, there are still some principled and knowledgeable doctors. But the main players are influenced by Fauci, Gates, and the others.

 

Here are several success stories around the world.

Global adoption of COVID-19 early treatments

 

It was created in 1975 by William Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura. Later Merck got involved in it. But because that company could not make enough money on it, the patent having expired, they designed a very pricey Ivermectin 2.0, so to speak. So, yea, it stands to reason that they would diss the original product.

 

Good grief, bro. Its in the book. Read it. I would love to have your thoughts on it.