J. Macarthur on John 3:16

Link please

 

So you think dying for those never to be saved is universalism.
Folks, Calvinists just make up false assertions to deflect from their false doctrine.

 

Yet another false charge from Calvinists. They want to derail discussion and waste time having their opponent deny their false charges. They use these vicious and vindictive ploys to hide their obviously false doctrines, such as claiming God does not love all mankind, the opposite of what scripture (John 3:16) says.

 

I do, if all those people have been universally atoned. If they have had their sins paid for, they are holy and righteous when they stand before God. In that case God would be unjust.

If you make entrance, not about God making everyone holy, but instead about belief, then you have turned salvation into a work that gets someone into heaven rather than understanding that belief is an effect of being both atoned for and saved.

So...your position is universalism or it's legalism. Which one?

 

Your position is to make up falsehoods and ask questions to deflect from truth, such as claiming God does not love all mankind, the opposite of what scripture (John 3:16) says.

1) Did anyone say all people have been universally atoned? Nope, so the Calvinist is posting falsehood to deflect from discussion of John Macarthur's view of John 3:16.

2) Did anyone say Christ dying for all mankind made all mankind holy and righteous? Nope, so the Calvinist is posting falsehood to deflect from discussion of John Macarthur's view of John 3:16.

3) Did anyone say Christ dying for all mankind makes God unjust? Or was that the claim of the falsehood posting Calvinist?

4) Did anyone "turn salvation into a work?" Nope, so the Calvinist is posting falsehood to deflect from discussion of John Macarthur's view of John 3:16.

5) Does God love all mankind? Yes, John 3:16.

 

So, you agree with limited atonement?

Yes, God loved the world so that whosoever believes (only people made spiritually alive will believe) will not perish, but have eternal life. Notice, John 3:16 does not say "whosoever chooses to believe." Ephesians 2 makes it clear that those who are dead in their trespasses and sins will not believe until God chooses to make them alive.

 

The TULI of the TULIP are false doctrines. I have posted this truth dozens of times. But this Calvinist wants you to believe he does not know the "L" is false doctrine.

Does Ephesians 2 support total spiritual inability as claimed by the Calvinist? Of course not. Just another falsehood to hide a falsehood. They remove a little here, add a little there, and redefine words another place to pour Calvinism into scripture.

 

Interesting, you teach limited atonement while denying it. How does that work?

 

This non-stop poster of falsehood after falsehood is at it again, pathetically trying to have me address his false charges, rather than discuss the fact God loves all mankind according to John Macarthur.

 

Charles Spurgeon (a Calvinist that you might have heard of) preached an entire Sunday sermon on just that one verse (John 3:16). One of his points was that God “so loved the world” and His love was for all mankind. Another of his points was that God “gave His Son” for the salvation of “whosoever believes”, which means that EVERY believer is included and EVERY unbeliever is excluded. Read the verse for yourself:

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” [John 3:16 NKJV]
​

Believers, by definition, believe and have “everlasting life” because “God gave his only son”.
Unbelievers, by definition, do not believe and do not have “everlasting life”.

 

Calvin Trillin, Calvin Coolidge?!?

 

Here we have the false claim, Calvinism does not interpret "world" in John 3:16 to refer only to the elect.

Here is a link to just one of many sites where true Calvinism is proclaimed:
The “World” of John 3:16 Does Not Mean “All Men Without Exception” by David J. Engelsma – Grace Online Library

 

Do all non-Calvinists agree on every detail of every verse?
If not, then why does it surprise you that Calvinists have different opinions on specific points in specific verses?

No Calvinist, believes that God is really trying to save every person without exception, but the free will of men just keeps thwarting the will of God. So Calvinists disagree on the meaning of “world” in John 3:16, but even those Calvinists that believe God loves the world (every person) do not believe that God is attempting to save every person. And the Greek word translated “world” is used in other verses to refer to “all of mankind” and “all of a nation” and “some from all different kinds”, so both definitions are possible and even EXPERTS disagree about the intended meaning.

(The majority of scholars seem to support “world” meaning God loves all of mankind in John 3:16)

However only “whosoever believes” has eternal life, and you are quick to jump to the eisegetical conclusion that “whosoever” chose of their own free will to believe before God would do anything to save them. John 3:16 DOES NOT SAY THAT!

Since only the ELECT believe and have “eternal life”, it is not unreasonable for some to interpret “world” to be “those who will believe from every nation, tribe, tongue and people” as contrasted with salvation being only available to Jews that could enter the Temple under the OT Law.