1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jack Chick on the KJV

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Salty, Aug 31, 2021.

  1. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
  2. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,219
    Likes Received:
    406
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jack Chick claimed: "We are now up to our necks in all these new Bible versions, all approved by the Vatican."

    In order to supposedly advocate the KJV, it seems KJV-only advocates have to resort to falsehoods and use of fallacies.

    He failed to prove that all new Bible versions are approved by the Vatican. Would the Vatican approve a Bible version that does not include the Apocrypha? Was Jack Chick using the guilt by association fallacy in his unproven claim?

    KJV-only advocates tend to believe assertions and claims that are not true.
     
    #2 Logos1560, Sep 1, 2021
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2021
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Strange that Church of Rome would support translations made by those against their official doctrines and dogmas!
     
Loading...