Well, maybe it's just me, but I'd consider fermentation to be a 'biological process.'Gwyneth said:Can you elaborate, please?
e.g. Other biological processes = ?????
Ed
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Well, maybe it's just me, but I'd consider fermentation to be a 'biological process.'Gwyneth said:Can you elaborate, please?
e.g. Other biological processes = ?????
I addressed the upper portion in a seperate post already but I wanted to bring something to your attention about this passage.webdog said:I think it's very clear from Scripture Jesus made the very best wine (Isaiah 25:6 defines this), and being jewish, did in fact drink wine, as all jews have done for thousands of years.
And this is contradictory to my point how?gb93433 said:Wine will not rot. Grape juice will either rot or ferment depending on the conditions.
A.T. Robertson writes,
"With new wine (gleukous). Sweet wine, but intoxicating. Sweet wine kept a year was very intoxicating. Genitive case here after memestômenoi eisin (periphrastic perfect passive indicative), old verb mestoô, only here in the N.T. Tanked up with new wine, state of fulness."
I do not think it is contradictory. Often people try and manipulate the meaning of the Greek word in Acts to mean something other than wine. People can act like they are out of their mind or drunk when they are extremely happy or in some kind of emotional state of mind that is way beyond normal.Allan said:And this is contradictory to my point how?
I said what they were accusing them of doing was actually being drunk and that the word wine here meant just that - alcoholic.
Well, maybe it's just me, but I'd consider fermentation to be a 'biological process.'![]()
Fermentation is not decay. It is actually a purification biological process. I think whether it is metaphorical or not, the very fact the Holy Spirit would inspire such language (if the consumption of wine were sinful) alluding to God participating in something sinful doesn't make much sense.Allan said:I addressed the upper portion in a seperate post already but I wanted to bring something to your attention about this passage.
This is referencing the time AFTER the Millinnienal reign of Christ, when there is a new heaven and a new earth. There is not sin there, no death thus no decay. The imagery there metaphorical according various lexicons. The mountain is figurative to the Kingdom because not all the people of world can remotely fit in Jerusalem. The feast (of fat and wines on the lees) are themselves according to thayers lexicon specifically (it's easist to find and research online) metaphores with breaking away for their yoke and the other speaks of peace and tranquility). Don't take my word for it though.
But again this is after the MR and after the new earth is created in which we will live. No death, no decay, no sin... how can there be fermintation? I know it is more a question in the relm of speculation but this passage is actually speaking figuritively of the people feastiing on the blessing of Christ and the peace and tranquility that will accompany it.
We cannot even do this today, how could it have been done thousands of years ago? Why does my pasteurized, sealed, refrigerated grape juice still ferment after time?Jerome said:The article describes hermetic sealing and natural antioxidants being employed to combat decomposition.
Are you really that clueless about what causes things to spoil?
The article describes hermetic sealing and natural antioxidants being employed to combat decomposition.
Are you really that clueless about what causes things to spoil?QUOTE]
are you really as rude as your post implies?
I agree that we shouldn't offend a weaker brother...but I don't think ignorance of the topic should be encouraged, either. It seems to be cultural. The United States is one of the only countries to hold to this view. If we lived in another part of the world, coffee consumption may be the topic of this thread.Allan said:Guys remember I'm not saying one can not drink.
I'm saying there is enough scripture to make one examine why they should.
and secondly there is the weaker brother and our christian liberty to limit ourselves for the their sakes.
1 John 3:16. Who will die to themselves for their brothers in Christ?
Paul, knowing full well his christian liberty, would not eat or drink (ever!) if he knew that it caused his brother/sister to stumble because to them it was sin. We claim we are not prideful but how many of us are willing to swollow our pride (I mean liberty) that we might endevor to encourage others to grow in Christ.
THAT is my point in this thread - as well as other odd and ends.
Fermentation is the breaking down of its original state and changing it's composition to something distinctly different. Technically that falls into the catagory of decay - or to deteriorate (no longer in its original state)webdog said:Fermentation is not decay. It is actually a purification biological process. I think whether it is metaphorical or not, the very fact the Holy Spirit would inspire such language (if the consumption of wine were sinful) alluding to God participating in something sinful doesn't make much sense.
Brother, people thousands of years ago cut gemstones more accurately than our modern machinery. The pyramids blocks were placed so closely together you can not get a razor between many of them, and we to this day can not duplicate this.webdog said:We cannot even do this today, how could it have been done thousands of years ago? Why does my pasteurized, sealed, refrigerated grape juice still ferment after time?
I'm sorry, but on this one you are wrongAllan said:Fermentation is the breaking down of its original state and changing it's composition to something distinctly different. Technically that falls into the catagory of decay - or to deteriorate (no longer in its original state)
Web, have you ever heard/read me ever state that drinking was/is sinful?
lastly - ferminitation is not purification :thumbs:
To purify something means that you taking out of it anything that would imbue or taint what it's original was/is.
Nonsequitur said:Timothy 3:8 (New American Standard Bible)
8 Deacons likewise must be men of dignity, not double-tongued,or addicted to much wine or fond of sordid gain,
If wine is really just grape juice, how much grape juice can a deacon have before he is disqualified from that office?
Allan said:Tom, the word in Acts 2:15 isn't "oinos" a generic term for both fermented and unfermented wine but this word for wine here is "gleukos". Thus it is specific and refers to a newly made or sweet wine.
Their accusation about them being drunk was because they were claiming the dead man some called the Christ had risen.
So for Peter to get up and state that they were 'follers of Christ they don't drink' would given rise to even more laughter and speculation. However Peter did state that they were not drunk and then proceeded to exound what they talking about.
New wine was alcoholic, but not well refined. It was not the "best" well aged wine. All wine ferments to the same percentage pretty quickly, but it is time that separates good wine from bad and mediocre wine. The vintage is very important.Tom Butler said:Thanks, Allan.
I'm ignorant about wine. Is new wine fermented? I'm assuming so, since drunkenness and new wine are connected in 2:15.
If so, can it be inferred from Peter's response that they were fermented wine drinkers?
I recognize that this event is somewhat of a stretch for arguing about wine in the Bible. That's why I asked folks more knowledgeable than I to comment.
Will do. Take care of your little onesAllan said:Anyway brother, I have my peace.
Keep God first but don't forget about me in your thoughts.
Love you all.
Allan