• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Judge Delivers Major Blow to Biden Admin in Social Media Censorship Case

A federal judge has made a historic ruling by partially granting an injunction that blocks various Biden administration officials and government agencies like the Justice Department and the FBI from working with big tech firms to censor posts on social media.

The injunction came in response to a censorship-by-proxy lawsuit brought by attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, who have accused Biden administration officials and various government agencies of pressuring social media companies to suspend accounts or take down posts.

The judge, Terry A. Doughty, wrote in the July 4 judgment (pdf) that various government agencies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of State, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are prohibited from taking a range of actions with regards to social media companies.


Specifically, the agencies and their staff members are prohibited from meeting or contacting by phone, email, text message or “engaging in any communication of any kind with social-media companies urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner for removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech,” per the injunction.

The agencies are also barred from flagging content on posts on social media platforms and forwarding them to the companies with requests for action such as removing or otherwise suppressing their reach.

Encouraging or otherwise egging on social media companies to change their guidelines for the removal, suppression, or reduction of content that contains protected free speech by the government is also not allowed.

The judge, a Trump appointee, wrote in the ruling that the Republican attorneys general who sued the Biden administration “have produced evidence of a massive effort by Defendants, from the White House to federal agencies, to suppress speech based on its content.”
 

Attachments

  • censorship.pdf
    1.7 MB · Views: 0

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Censorship-by-proxy

Sounds like something the Democrats would cook up to defile the Constitution's protection of free speech. But still, on this very board, several professing Christians deny that Christians should not vote for Democrats. Mind-boggling.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Censorship-by-proxy

Sounds like something the Democrats would cook up to defile the Constitution's protection of free speech.
That's the whole question. When working with the government to promote a narrative, and restrict opposition speech, are they operating as government agents?

Obviously.


But still, on this very board, several professing Christians deny that Christians should not vote for Democrats. Mind-boggling.

You're saying, Christians should not vote for Dems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top