1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Kerry - ties to Iran?

Discussion in 'Free-For-All Archives' started by LadyEagle, Oct 4, 2004.

  1. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Ratings:
    +1
    From WND, but, yes, I remember that, and remember being appalled.

    Lookie here:

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=12411

    No, problem, Lady Akbarpour. Halliburton is already there.

    http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11453

    See, people, what I keep telling you - none of these guys are for America's best interests - only their own. They're all corrupt!

    Vote for Michael Peroutka - he has no ties to enemies of the US. [​IMG]
     
  2. The Galatian

    The Galatian New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Ratings:
    +0
    To be fair, both candidates can argue that none of this is illegal.

    While taking money from Iranian sources is illegal, taking money from American citizens of Iranian descent is not.

    While collaborating with terrorist regimes is illegal for American companies, if they set up a dummy corporation in the Cayman Islands, and do it through that company, it's perfectly legal.

    Whether one or both of these needs to be changed, or whether it shows any moral flabbiness on the part of either party, I guess everyone can decide for themselves.
     
  3. LadyEagle

    LadyEagle <b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Messages:
    22,028
    Ratings:
    +1
    Well, somehow, I just can't imaging Thomas Jefferson taking donations from the Barbary pirates so that America would do business with them.

    This is a perfect example of how corrupt both parties are. We all know it's pat my back and I'll pat your back - but really, when we elect someone to public office and they are basically living off the public dole, why shouldn't they be required to not have conflicts of interest and why shouldn't they be required to implement policies which benefit the American people?

    So, what's the point in voting - if everyone is doing the same thing and everyone is on the "take"??
     
Loading...