1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Legalism

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by gerald285, Aug 21, 2007.

  1. christianyouth

    christianyouth New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2005
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    1
    There have been some good definitions of legalism so far. But I have to agree with Rufus. Many people are deemed legalists because they promote holiness. If a preacher says we need to abstain from worldliness, that's fine. But if he actually identifies wordliness and how one can spot it, he will be called a legalist. If he speaks out against practices that are worldly (smoking, movies, etc) people will think he is trying to impose his own standard of holiness to others.
     
  2. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    It depends upon how he "speaks out against smoking, etc." doesn't it? If he's simply saying he believes smoking is a waste of money, unhealthy, and an overall bad influence, then that's not legalism. If he says smoking is sinful, that's legalism. If he says that people who smoke are not saved, that's BIG TIME legalism.

    (I do not smoke, so don't bother with the "he's only defending it so he can do it without guilt" argument.)

    Movies are slightly different, because they MAY entice lusts the Bible specifically condemns. So I'm avoiding the issue of movies. They're harder to argue about, pro or con.
     
  3. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    I smoke cigars from tiem to time, so all the legalists take their best shot. And I enjoy a nice cold beer from time to time as well. neener neener neener
     
  4. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    Spurgeon also enjoyed cigars - one every night, I think. Here's one of my favorite stories...

    http://www.spurgeon.org/misc/cigars.htm
     
  5. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    that's awesome "....Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves." Rom 14:22
     
  6. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0


    "To ourselves this tobacco pest is a daily martyrdom, and we could earnestly wish that every Christian teacher, at all events, felt no desire to indulge in a habit... which is unquestionably most fearfully destructive both to the bodies and souls of tens of thousands of our young men." - James Clarke (friend of Spurgeon)​

    "Mr. Spurgeon, the greatest preacher in the world, smokes.' Since then, if report speaks true, this 'greatest preacher' has abandoned his cigar, not, as we wish he had done years ago, from religious principle, but because he was driven to it by its injurious influence upon his health." - Unnamed Clergyman

    The following is an excerpt from a letter that is a most worthy read. I encourage reading the whole response (it was in response to the famous Pentecost vs Spurgeon sermon) by clicking the link at the end.

    "The crusade against tobacco is conducted on precisely the same principles as the crusade against strong drink; and the arguments by which we advocate the one are almost identical with those by which we advocate the other.

    "Pharisees," are we? Well, we are in good company. We follow that arch-Pharisee who said,

    "If meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth [I Cor. 8:13];"

    and

    "It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor anything [is it possible that the word "anything" can include "a good cigar"?] whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak [Rom. 14:21]."

    We know tobacco is a stumbling-block, and an offence, and a cause of weakness to multitudes of our brethren—brethren in the Church of Christ—brethren in the bonds of a common humanity—and so we practise what "Pharisee" Paul teaches, and sacrifice personal indulgence, lest it should be a snare to others. We think we have also a Higher Authority and a Greater Example—even the authority and example of Him who "pleased not Himself [Rom. 15:3]."

    May I, without intentional impertinence, illustrate this? Two men stand side-by-side on the platform of the Metropolitan Tabernacle, the one a "Pharisee," the other—Mr. Spurgeon. One describes his pilgrimage along the steep rough path of self-denial, and tells us how he "took his cigar-box before the Lord, and cried for help." The other prefers the easier, smoother, smokier path of self-indulgence, holds fast to the cigar-box, and declares his intention to smoke a good cigar before going to bed. WHICH OF THESE LOOKS MOST LIKE CHRIST? Which would it be to the advantage of the young men, who heard both, to follow?" - WM Hutchings
     
  7. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    I am most sorry that prominence has been given to what seems to me so small a matter—and the last thing in my thoughts would have been the mention of it from the pulpit; but I was placed in such a position that I must either by my silence plead guilty to living in sin, or else bring down upon my unfortunate self the fierce rebukes of the anti-tobacco advocates by speaking out honestly. I chose the latter; and although I am now the target for these worthy brethren, I would sooner endure their severest censures than sneakingly do what I could not justify, and earn immunity from their criticism by tamely submitting to be charged with sin in an action which my conscience allows.

    Yours truly,

    C. H. SPURGEON.
     
  8. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Spurgeon was well known for his right criticism of theater attendance.

    "Or step into the conference hall of the infidel where he blasphemes your Maker's name; or sit in the theater where lustful and immoral plays are acted out, and from all these haunts of vice there comes the voice, “Minister, woe is to you if you do not preach the gospel.” - C.H. Spurgeon

    Was not Spurgeon thus, a "legalist" regarding the sins he had no affections for?
     
  9. Andy T.

    Andy T. Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    RB,

    I love Spurgeon, but maybe he was wrong on this one. He wasn't infallible, you know. And sometimes our "consciences" are not the most reliable.
     
  10. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    Sure, both he and I could be wrong. I open to the Scriptures correction on drinking, but not getting drunk, and cigar smoking.
     
  11. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    No, because I think that's a weak def of legalism.
     
  12. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, let's use his term then. He called those that preached against his smoking "pharisees", how was his smoking different from someone going to the theater? Was he a pharisee in speaking against the theater? Were those that preached against smoking and alcohol pharisees?
     
  13. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    The subject is legalism, what is it. I provided two good definations in an earlier post.
     
  14. Joe

    Joe New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    IMHO, I think the reason legalism is known as negative is because the legalists don't seem to understand that the world will only get worse. And that's ok, it's gods plan. :) Don't dwell upon it.

    When preaching, legalists spend more time talking about what the worldly people are doing wrong than talking of scripture verses. Everyone ought to listen to their Pastors sermons closely to see if this is what is happening.
    Often they talk of how they don't get along with, or agree with their their family members such as inlaws/parents. These personal issues aren't usually apparent in other Pastors sermons. They often over -use the term "train the kids up" to be this or that but for whatever reason, they give excuses why they can't achieve the same standard because they are tainted due to their lousy parents. This is not scriptual.

    Legalists usually have very wordly backgrounds. Despite this,they are very unforgiving when others commit the same sins. They are FULL of self-righteousness & Pride. They often talk of "the lost" It's an us against them attitude. And they decide who is the "them", not God.

    IMHO, it's the level of obsession in what others are doing wrong, and the personal attacks that usually gives legalists a bad name. Holding to standards doesn't make one a legalist.
     
    #34 Joe, Aug 22, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2007
  15. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes you did, and I appreciated your definitions. You and npetreley went on the smoking, drinking and Spurgeon kick so I followed along. Typically the invective of "pharisee" and "legalist" go hand and hand and since Spurgeon is your man that encourages you to justify your sin, I thought we could use him to demonstrate his obvious contradicting stances on similar issues. However, if you desire to move on, I can dig it.
     
  16. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28
    You have now accused me of sin. This is the job of Holy Scripture. Please provide some.
     
  17. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    We have no fate but what we make. It doesn't have to get worse, it just does because Christians cease being salt and they get soft on sin.
    Give me a couple folks who you define as being legalists and I'll take a listen.

    If other pastors aren't preaching against sin then they are apt to get along quite well with the world.

    Train up the child in the way he should go is scriptural. Are you saying they don't use scripture, they do use scripture or you just don't know scripture when you hear it?
    That's why you must be born-again. What saved Christian came out of something other than a worldly background?

    God has given me the discernment to know that the "lost" are not "us". Do you believe the lost is part of your group?

    Sin is personal and I suspect when the carnal hear someone preaching against sin they personalize and consider it to be a personal attack even though it is an attack against sin.
     
  18. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    The subject is legalism, what is it?
     
  19. ReformedBaptist

    ReformedBaptist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    28

    Friend, you said this to me "since Spurgeon is your man that encourages you to justify your sin"

    What sin are you accusing me of and what Scripture are you basing it on? Perhaps I am in sin...my concience is clear, but seeing that you have judged it sin I want to be rebuked and corrected by God. So please, provide Scripture that teaches me:

    1. Cigar smoking is a sin.
    2. Drinking alcholic drinks are sin, even when a person doesn't get intoxicated.
     
  20. Joe

    Joe New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    deleted post
     
    #40 Joe, Aug 22, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 22, 2007
Loading...