1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Les Feldick

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by hawg_427, Dec 28, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. hawg_427

    hawg_427 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Has anybody watched to Les Feldick teach the Bible on TV? If so what is your impression?
     
  2. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have enjoyed his program. Also check out his website. His view of how sin did not come from Mary's nature, but through Adam's was a bit odd for me.
    That might make a good thread.
     
  3. JerryL

    JerryL New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    0
    What is odd in your eyes about sin coming from Adam instead of Mary?
     
  4. D28guy

    D28guy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    0
    He may have meant to type "Eve", rather than "Mary".

    Mike
     
  5. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's been a long time since I read this, so I had to do some research to find it.
    Here is an excerpt:



    Here is the link
    http://www.lesfeldick.org/lesqa-c.html#2c
     
  6. Deacon

    Deacon Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2002
    Messages:
    7,387
    Likes Received:
    253
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Aarrrrggggh! That is pure hogwash.
    Preachers ought to preach truth from the word.
    They shouldn't force science into supporting their points.

    Physiologically speaking an infants blood is all its own.
    However an infants blood is formed from genetic material from both the father and the mother.

    I've never heard of Les Feldick but if this is his stuff I'd have to wonder.

    Rob
     
    #6 Deacon, Dec 30, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 30, 2007
  7. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    1
    Like I said, I thought it was odd. :laugh:

    Maybe he's right, I don't know, but it sounds rather "out there".

    I've never read anything in the Bible to support it.
     
  8. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Les Feldick:
    //Physiologically speaking again, there is none of the mother's blood
    that ever becomes part and parcel of that little baby.
    The blood comes from the father. Always remember that!//

    Amen, Brother Deacon Rob -- Preach it! :thumbs:

    This statement: "blood comes from the father"
    is the determining factor of Caste in Hindu
    Doctrine. Those who teach "blood comes
    from the father" are teaching Hindu Doctrine

    NOT Christian Doctrine.
    I've read the Holy Bible several times since i've
    been a Christian the past 55 years.
    I never found even a hint that the
    "blood comes from the father".
     
    #8 Ed Edwards, Dec 30, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 30, 2007
  9. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    13,395
    Likes Received:
    472
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It's a fairly old and common view. It's originator may be M. R. DeHaan, a medical doctor turned well known Bible teacher, in his book The Chemistry of the Blood (1943). His view actually was that blood does not appear until after fertilization, so in that sense the baby receives no blood from its mother. He connects this (p. 31 ff) with the federal headship view of how Adam's sin is imputed to us, and thus the creationist view of how the soul is formed--that is, directly by God each time rather than being imparted from the parents. Thus, Christ was humanly without a sin nature because his blood, as received through the Holy Spirit's action in the virgin birth, was untainted.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. D28guy

    D28guy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2002
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting. Martin DeHaan certainly has a stellar reputation in the evangelical world.

    Whether Felick is correct or not about this particular topic, I would recommend him to anyone. I used to watch his TV broadcast and have resourced his web-site many times. An excellant teacher of the scriptures, imo.

    Mike
     
  11. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    13,395
    Likes Received:
    472
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Right! So DeHaan is not an off-the-wall guy doing the theorizing. (I don't know about Felick--until he comes to Japan and I have to know!) I vaguely remember this view being taught growing up in the 1950's & 1960's, and no one thought it was weird. In fact, much of what he wrote in this book was based on the fact that "the life of the flesh is in the blood," so we need to study that more deeply.

    I think this may be one place where feminism and its drive for perfect equality has an influence on our thinking. Not that I am saying anyone on this thread is a feminist, but our society does influence our theology sometimes. In this case, though, DeHaan is saying that the sin nature comes through the male. Seems like feminists would like that! :smilewinkgrin: :laugh:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. JerryL

    JerryL New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Les Feldick is a good teacher and like alot of good teachers, they are sometimes faulty on some things. That doesn't make them a bad teacher on one bad thought. I'm not saying Les's view of the blood is right or wrong. I've saw flaws in several very good teachers, yet they have good teachings also. We have to use a Bible and a diserning mind sometimes to sort through some stuff. I will venture out and say Luther,Spurgeon, Calvin and Arminus(sp?) had flawed teachings mixed with good.
     
  13. Daniel71317

    Daniel71317 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have had a few folks in my church ask me about him... seems to be a pretty straightforward and understandable Bible teacher. He does preach what is called "Mid-Acts Dispensationalism" or Hyperdispensationalism. This system of Bible interpretation leads to some significant doctrinal departures from what Baptists have traditional taught and practiced. (Ignoring the Great Commission, not practicing the observance of the ordinances, preaching two different gospels - one for Jewish Christians and another for Gentile Christians, minimizing the doctrinal importance of all but the Pauline epistles) I personally have been cautioning my church members regarding his ministry.
     
  14. annsni

    annsni Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,765
    Likes Received:
    625
    **Just a note, this is a 10 year old thread**
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Daniel71317

    Daniel71317 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2017
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    1
    Faith:
    Baptist
    :) sorry... fairly new to message boards and such! Thanks!!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    10,869
    Likes Received:
    782
    Faith:
    Baptist
    This zombie thread is closed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...