McCain and Frun are correct in their opinions on the GOP.
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/03/29/f-rfa-macdonald.html
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/03/29/f-rfa-macdonald.html
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
McCain and Frun are correct in their opinions on the GOP
- Thread starter Crabtownboy
- Start date
Tom Bryant
Well-Known Member
Isn't it interesting that with all the cameras and recorders at the Rally not ONE of them picked up any racial epithets.
But just because no one heard it doesn't mean it didn't happen. But it does mean that it wasn't a broad spectrum of what the people there were saying.
I notice the writer changed from his praise of Senator McCain to the speech writer when he started talking about repealing the president's Health Care. McCain has already said he was going to worrk to change it. McCain wouldn't be too far from the tea party and Gov Palin if he shared the platform with her. She must feel he is the man who ought to reperesent as opposed to his J.D. Hayworth.
Maybe the writers own biases are shown when he refers to Sen. McCain's smile as "constipated" and "rictus". His choice of modifiers show he is not an unbiased observer. Maybe he should stick with issues in Canada.
But just because no one heard it doesn't mean it didn't happen. But it does mean that it wasn't a broad spectrum of what the people there were saying.
I notice the writer changed from his praise of Senator McCain to the speech writer when he started talking about repealing the president's Health Care. McCain has already said he was going to worrk to change it. McCain wouldn't be too far from the tea party and Gov Palin if he shared the platform with her. She must feel he is the man who ought to reperesent as opposed to his J.D. Hayworth.
Maybe the writers own biases are shown when he refers to Sen. McCain's smile as "constipated" and "rictus". His choice of modifiers show he is not an unbiased observer. Maybe he should stick with issues in Canada.