McKinney Mom From Pool Party Video Speaks:

[Revmitchell]

So the jist of her testimony is that the majority of the kids at the party were there illegally and uninvited and refused to leave once they were asked. Instead they tried to make it a race thing for being asked even though everyone was being asked who did not live in that community.

So the police were not there to harrass them they were there to harrass the community. It now appears they were looking for a race fight. Watch the video



http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2015/06/16/...y-video-speaks-this-is-not-about-black-white/

 

[Use of Time]

You are cherry picking as usual but that is expected. You are also attempting to portray kids crashing a swimming pool as looking for a race fight which is pretty presumptuous and disingenuous if you discount the other testimonies. Which of course you are blatantly doing here.

Always trying to control the narrative. It's so tedious.

 

[Revmitchell]

First rule of thumb is to NEVER, EVER trust a leftist or anyone like Stephen Benavides from an organization called ‘Dallas for Change’.

Benavides is the man who claimed that a white McKinney Mom started a fight with one of the black punks invading a private pool during an out-of-control party recently.

Stephen Benavides, who does social media for ‘Dallas for Change’ and blogs for the far left wing Daily Kos, was the one who has continually LIED about this woman and tried to destroy her life, hurt her family and force her to lose her job:


http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/...-pool-party-mom-who-was-fleeing-with-children

 

[Use of Time]

You respond to my comment about cherry picking with a 25 second video as if that settles everything. I guess I shouldn't be surprised at this point. So apparently, since time doesn't exist before or after this half minute video was posted she could not have been responsible for these actions before or after this video was taken? :laugh: I hope you realize that despite left leaning news services pushing the testimonies that they have received and the right leaning news services pushing their testimonies we are still left with he said she said nonsense. It's just kind of funny how you will take whatever side serves you as the gospel. Then again I know the news sites you frequent so it isn't really unexpected.

 

[carpro]

Always trying to control the narrative. It's so tedious.

I've seen you do the same thing many times.

 

[targus]

How exactly does one "control the narrative" on a public discussion board?

 

[Revmitchell]

How exactly does one "control the narrative" on a public discussion board?

That is yet another thing on this board that should be left alone.

 

[Use of Time]

How exactly does one "control the narrative" on a public discussion board?

Watch Rev. He does this on a daily basis.

 

[Use of Time]

I've seen you do the same thing many times.

Any examples chief? I pretty much respond to content. I have started maybe three or four threads throughout my entire membership.

 

[carpro]

Any examples chief? I pretty much respond to content. I have started maybe three or four threads throughout my entire membership.

Your standard technique, JG, is to change the narrative by deliberately mis-stating what others say and then trying to control the narrative from that standpoint.

Why deny it?

Every poster here tries to control the narrative in one way or another. That's the way discussion boards work.

You're every bit as guilty as the rest of us.

 

[Zaac]

So the jist of her testimony is that the majority of the kids at the party were there illegally and uninvited and refused to leave once they were asked. Instead they tried to make it a race thing for being asked even though everyone was being asked who did not live in that community.

So the police were not there to harrass them they were there to harrass the community. It now appears they were looking for a race fight. Watch the video



http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2015/06/16/...y-video-speaks-this-is-not-about-black-white/

Her testimony is a joke. The parents and the HOA had already said that the young lady had reserved the pool. So if folks were there illegally, she wouldn't have known unless the person she was fighting told her.

 

[Use of Time]

Your standard technique, JG, is to change the narrative by deliberately mis-stating what others say and then trying to control the narrative from that standpoint.

Why deny it?

Every poster here tries to control the narrative in one way or another. That's the way discussion boards work.

You're every bit as guilty as the rest of us.

Every poster tries to control the narrative around here? Wow, I suppose it's no surprise that you and your ilk actually approach the board this way but I don't think that's what most others do.

As usual when asked to come up with examples you come up with nothing. What a surprise.

 

[carpro]

Every poster tries to control the narrative around here?

OK , JG.

Live in denial. You're the exception.

 

[Use of Time]

What exactly is JG?:laugh:

The whole point of a discussion board is to participate in a discussion and learn from each other. That does happen here. Are you saying that when someone starts a thread by asking a question in the general baptist section that they are trying to "control the narrative?" How about the sports section? How about people sharing prayer request, recipes, funny jokes. Are these people controlling the narrative? That makes absolutely no sense.

 

[carpro]

What exactly is JG?:laugh:

The whole point of a discussion board is to participate in a discussion and learn from each other. That does happen here. Are you saying that when someone starts a thread by asking a question in the general baptist section that they are trying to "control the narrative?" How about the sports section? How about people sharing prayer request, recipes, funny jokes. Are these people controlling the narrative? That makes absolutely no sense.

There you go again. Trying to control the narrative.

Thought you were the exception.

 

[Use of Time]

There you go again. Trying to control the narrative.

Thought you were the exception.

Yeah, I thought so. Well get back to me if you can ever fire off enough synapses to articulate a rationale for your own argument.

 

[carpro]

Yeah, I thought so. Well get back to me if you can ever fire off enough synapses to articulate a rationale for your own argument.

Get back to me when you stop trying to control the narrative.

That will be never. :thumbs:

 

[Revmitchell]

Get back to me when you stop trying to control the narrative.

That will be never. :thumbs:

So now you are irrational. :laugh: Sound like anyone else you know around here?

 

[Use of Time]

So now you are irrational. :laugh: Sound like anyone else you know around here?

Thanks pastor. There are several.