Media reacts to 'Clinton Cash'

Bloomberg Politics’ Mark Halperin: The Clinton Cash revelations are “extraordinarily serious,” said Halperin. “Here’s why you know this is serious because any Democrat, almost any Democrat, who is not on the Clinton’s payroll will tell reporters and others that these are serious issues, forget the politics.


National Journal’s Ron Fournier: “You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorists here, Chris, to know the foreign companies hope to buy influence. You don’t have to be a lawyer to know that they violated ethics laws.


Meet the Press host Chuck Todd: I heard an earful last night [at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner] from various Democrats, some who work in the Clinton campaign that said, “Why is she still taking foreign donations?


Pulitzer Prize-Winning Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin: “I think what still boggles the mind, why doesn’t Hillary deal with this herself right now… I think she has to answer this herself.”


Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassel: “Everyone seems to understand this is a huge problem, other than the Clintons.


MSNBC’s Chris Matthews: But when countries give you money, they want something besides love.”


Former Democratic San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown: This has the potential of being a bigger liability than the e-mail affair or Benghazi because taking money from a foreign government when you hold a Cabinet job is a potential conflict of interest that everyone can grasp…“It could even be fatal to Clinton’s candidacy

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...sh-accurate-we-took-undisclosed-foreign-cash/

"Mistakenly"... Really?

 

There's plenty here to warrant an investigation. Senator Menendez was investigated for less. And was indicted...after an investigation.

But, of course, those emails.... :smilewinkgrin: