• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

New Study Thoroughly Debunks Global Warming...

targus

New Member
Professor Dr. Jan Esper's group at the Institute of Geography at JGU used tree-ring density measurements from sub-fossil pine trees originating from Finnish Lapland to produce a reconstruction reaching back to 138 BC. In so doing, the researchers have been able for the first time to precisely demonstrate that the long-term trend over the past two millennia has been towards climatic cooling.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...lobal-warming-will-media-notice#ixzz20K29GFBc
 

mandym

New Member
An international team including scientists from Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) has published a reconstruction of the climate in northern Europe over the last 2,000 years based on the information provided by tree-rings. Professor Dr. Jan Esper's group at the Institute of Geography at JGU used tree-ring density measurements from sub-fossil pine trees originating from Finnish Lapland to produce a reconstruction reaching back to 138 BC. In so doing, the researchers have been able for the first time to precisely demonstrate that the long-term trend over the past two millennia has been towards climatic cooling. "We found that previous estimates of historical temperatures during the Roman era and the Middle Ages were too low," says Esper. "Such findings are also significant with regard to climate policy, as they will influence the way today's climate changes are seen in context of historical warm periods." The new study has been published in the journal Nature Climate Change.

http://www.uni-mainz.de/eng/15491.php
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If you custom cherry-pick the endpoints for your graphs you can 'prove' just about anything. If the theory is that man has created a climate warming effect by the industrial revolution (pollution and accelerated use of natural resources) what sense does it make to go back to 138 BC to disprove the theory?
 

mandym

New Member
If you custom cherry-pick the endpoints for your graphs you can 'prove' just about anything. If the theory is that man has created a climate warming effect by the industrial revolution (pollution and accelerated use of natural resources) what sense does it make to go back to 138 BC to disprove the theory?

Not sure why this is not understood. The comparison is made to show the heating or cooling trend.
 

targus

New Member
If you custom cherry-pick the endpoints for your graphs you can 'prove' just about anything. If the theory is that man has created a climate warming effect by the industrial revolution (pollution and accelerated use of natural resources) what sense does it make to go back to 138 BC to disprove the theory?

So if the period from the industrial revolution to today is cooler on average than it has been on average since 138 BC...

In your mind that is evidence of man made global warming?
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So if the period from the industrial revolution to today is cooler on average than it has been on average since 138 BC...

In your mind that is evidence of man made global warming?

I'd have to look at the data. For example if this is the data, it would indeed show a long term trend over 2 millennia towards cooling


Year........Average temperature
BC 138.....65 degrees
BC 38.......64.8
AD 38.......64.6
AD138.......64.5
AD500.......64.2
AD750.......64.1
AD1000.....63.9
AD1250.....63.8
AD1500.....63.6
AD1750.....63.5
AD1850.....63.8
AD1900.....64.0
AD1950.....64.3
AD2000.....64.6

Long term there is a cooling trend. But from the industrial revolution forward there is a warming trend.
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
I'd have to look at the data. For example if this is the data, it would indeed show a long term trend over 2 millennia towards cooling


Year........Average temperature
BC 138.....65 degrees
BC 38.......64.8
AD 38.......64.6
AD138.......64.5
AD500.......64.2
AD750.......64.1
AD1000.....63.9
AD1250.....63.8
AD1500.....63.6
AD1750.....63.5
AD1850.....63.8
AD1900.....64.0
AD1950.....64.3
AD2000.....64.6

Long term there is a cooling trend. But from the industrial revolution forward there is a warming trend.

So, then what made it so hot in BC138- Horse, sheep, oxen and goat flatulence perhaps?
 
Top