1. 

   Logos1560 Well-Known Member

   Site Supporter

   Joined:

   Oct 22, 2004

   Messages:

   6,217

   Likes Received:

   406

   Faith:

   Baptist

   Thanks for the interesting link. I looked at it briefly and plan to check it out more later. I do not think that his KJV edition is actually the 1769 Oxford edition, but it is a common assumption that today's KJV edition is the 1769.

    

   #21 Logos1560, May 15, 2011
2. 

   rsr <b> 7,000 posts club</b>

   Moderator

   Joined:

   Dec 11, 2001

   Messages:

   11,852

   Likes Received:

   1,085

   Faith:

   Baptist

   After reading the explanatory notes, I believe the text is the 1769-71 Baskerville (his second edition of the 1762 Cambridge text), and not the 1769 Oxford.

    

   #22 rsr, May 15, 2011

   Last edited by a moderator: May 15, 2011
3. 

   jbh28 Active Member

   Joined:

   Mar 14, 2008

   Messages:

   3,761

   Likes Received:

   2

   I figured I would see if anyone would have any examples again. I noticed there are a few that were not around when this thread was being discussed.

    

   #23 jbh28, Jun 7, 2011

• Log in with Facebook

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in