• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Non-KJBO lies

Askjo

New Member
Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
All I ask is for someone to provide the Scriptural support for the complete and total rejection of all other Versions of God's Holy Word.
2 Cor. 2:17.
 

Orvie

New Member
Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Charles Meadows:
The KJB says "shalt preserve", not preserved.
Thank you for correcting my English. :D
And the "them" in verse 7 is people and not words.
Jump and cast aside verse 6. Why?
</font>[/QUOTE]Leave verse 8 dangling, why?
 

Orvie

New Member
Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
All I ask is for someone to provide the Scriptural support for the complete and total rejection of all other Versions of God's Holy Word.
2 Cor. 2:17. </font>[/QUOTE]2 Cor 2:17 ESV Yeah, go to those KJVO sites, and see for yourself the peddling! i.e. "Don't trust those MV's...only buy the KJV, from us" :rolleyes:
laugh.gif
 

natters

New Member
Askjo said "The KJV is the preserved Word of God because of the KJV superiority over to any MVs. Obvious!"

Then why isn't the Geneva the preserved Word of God because of the Geneva superiority over to any MVs?
 

Orvie

New Member
Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dr. Bob:
and . . .
The KJV is the preserved Word of God because of the KJV superiority over to any MVs. Obvious! </font>[/QUOTE]i.e. "My favourite version can beat up your favorite version(s)" :eek:
 

Askjo

New Member
Originally posted by C4K:
So what do Spanish speakers, French speakers. Germand speakers do? Must they learn English? All of those languages are different from English. How do we know which language to trust?!?
They have accurate translations in their mother tongue. Romans 16:26
 

Orvie

New Member
Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by C4K:
So what do Spanish speakers, French speakers. Germand speakers do? Must they learn English? All of those languages are different from English. How do we know which language to trust?!?
They have accurate translations in their mother tongue. Romans 16:26 </font>[/QUOTE]...and so do we....KJV, NKJV, ESV....I thank God that He is able and willing to speak to me in today's English.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
2 Peter 1:21 (HCSB = The Holman Christian Standard Bible)
because no prophecy ever came by the will of man;
instead, moved by the Holy Spirit, men spoke from God


Here i believe that "spoke" is a metaphor for any form
of communication including "write" and typeing on a
computer.

But I love to praise Jesus in 17th Century talk:
wavey.gif
Praise Iesus, the Christ
wavey.gif
 

Askjo

New Member
Originally posted by Johnv:
The KJV is not a perfect translation. It's a good translation, but not a perfect translation.
The KJV is most accurate translation than a perfect translation.
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
All I ask is for someone to provide the Scriptural support for the complete and total rejection of all other Versions of God's Holy Word.
2 Cor. 2:17. </font>[/QUOTE]II.Corinthians II.17 (IJV1611):
For wee are not as many which
||corrupt the word of God: but as of
sinceritie, but as of God, in the sight of
God speake we in Christ.


sidenote: || Or, deale deceitfully with.

The "Or" translator footnote means that
the source text word can be translated
into two (in this case) different manners,
the two English versions conveying the
general meaning area of the source language
(here Greek).

So here is the alternative inspired, inerrant
word of God of the REAL King Iames Version, 1611
Edition, in this verse:

II.Corinthians II.17 (IJV1611alt):
For wee are not as many which
deale deceitfully with the word of God: but as of
sinceritie, but as of God, in the sight of
God speake we in Christ.


Wilst the primary meaning might be streached
to cover verisons by one with low regard
for the truth, there is no way that the
second can be streached to have anything
to do with versions. Here the topic of
discussion is what people do with words.
This verse reinforces my saying:

There is more variation among folks
understandings of the scripture than
among the versions.

wavey.gif
 

Ed Edwards

<img src=/Ed.gif>
Originally posted by Orvie:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Askjo:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Baptist in Richmond:
All I ask is for someone to provide the Scriptural support for the complete and total rejection of all other Versions of God's Holy Word.
2 Cor. 2:17. </font>[/QUOTE]2 Cor 2:17 ESV Yeah, go to those KJVO sites, and see for yourself the peddling! i.e. "Don't trust those MV's...only buy the KJV, from us" :rolleyes:
laugh.gif
</font>[/QUOTE]Yep. My first run-in with
the KJVO movement. 1963, Charleston,
South Carolina. I hear a radio preacher
denouncing the (I don't really remember
which version). I get a list of
differences from the KJV1769 and the
other version. I also get a list of neat KJV
bibles for sale, none of them the
real KJV, 1611 Edition.

wave.gif
 
Top