Obama supports unlimited slaughter of children

I'll compromise with you. It is a half truth. :jesus:

 

You make a statement like this but choose to debate the "title" of the thread!?

Maybe you should re-consider your priorities and not waste your time defending Obama's stance! Seriously, this is the time to step back and realize what you are saying.

FIFTY MILLION children have been aborted since Roe v. Wade, over ONE MILLION children are aborted every year, or THREE THOUSAND children killed each day. That means approximately 15,000 innocent and helpless children have been murdered since this thread started. But let's argue over the title?

Let me state that again. Over FIFTEEN THOUSAND innocent and helpless children have had their skulls crushed then sucked out since this thread started.


The "slaughter" of even one innocent child is a crime against God so let's not argue over the numbers. It is a pathetic and criminal act and not simply a "choice" as Obama and others choose to see it.

In Christ

 

Someone early on pointed out nitpicking. So true, this thread is ridiculous. Doesn't seem to be any form of abortion Obama's against.

 

It is truly sad when someone is more concerned about the title of the thread than the substance of it - the substance that shows Obama supports such wickedness.

 

I am in agreement with you, since he supports the murder of live born babies, and says they do not deserve protection and medical help, then the issue is his view on abortion, not the title of this thread.

 

I don't think anyone is excusing his support of killing the unborn. To criticise those who disagree with the title in such a manner is as sensational as the title itself.

 

People are obviously making such a big thing about the title to get the topic off topic, which is obama's support of abortions, any abortions anytime for any reason.

 

You are questioning motivation wrongly. If the title had honestly and correctly said "Obama supports unlimited slaughter of the unborn" there would not have been an issue. The title is a part of the topic, not off topic at all.

 

\Obama supports the murder of the already born also, lets not forget that.

 

I disagree 100%. McCain is also due protection from exaggeration and sensationalism.

 

Yes, the title is wrong and sensational to the max! You know this, and to deny it is to deliberately hold on to a lie.

 

So if 'unlinited' is a lie, what is obama's limit on how many children should be murdered if he doesn't even draw the line at live birth babies?

 

Well I guess this shows God's love is boundless as otherwise surely He would end our apparent miserable state. To think this is supposed to be a Christian forum with only Christians participating.

What happened to Christian principles or the Church that Christians views could vary so drastically? Some of you should start putting God and the Bible first instead of politics.



The title, as some of you wish to debate instead of the crime, states; "Obama supports unlimited slaughter of children"


UNLIMITED:
1. Having no restrictions or controls......
2. Having or seeming to have no boundaries....
3. Without qualification or exception.....
answers.com


1 : lacking any controls : unrestricted <unlimited access>
2 : boundless, infinite <unlimited possibilities>
3 : not bounded by exceptions
webster



THE TITLE IS CORRECT! Not only does Obama support abortions, he supports late term abortions, and apparently even the slow death of children who were indeed born live, after a failed abortion.

Unlimited means without limits or boundaries. The title does not say Obama supports the murder off all children. Though some in this thread keep trying to loosely associate that with the word "unlimited", in attempting to discredit the thread.


It however does correctly show He supports abortions at every and any stage, from conception to actual birth. Which in fact means He has no boundaries or limits, hence "unlimited", in regards to abortion!

But again what does it say when some simply choose to argue over the title? Now EIGHTEEN THOUSAND or so children, gifts from God as God states, have been "slaughtered" since this thread started.

BTY, Obama gets a 100% rating from NARAL!

In Christ and God have mercyraying:

 

Thanks C4K.

To "support the unlimited slaughter of children" means, by your own definition, to "support the boundless slaughter of children without limitation". This is blatantly untrue of Obama. Obama, for all his pro-choice stances, certainly does not support the unlimited slaughter of those children which are born. And those children which are born are a subcategory -- indeed the largest category -- of the group "children". Further, I've never heard Obama suggest that abortions should be performed en masse to women without their consent. So, right there, we have two very important restrictions which must be placed on Obama's support for "unlimited slaughter", thereby, by your own definition, meaning that he does NOT support any such thing as the "unlimited slaughter" of children.

Obama's pro-choice position is well-known here -- indeed, you'd have to be living under a rock not to have heard about it this past year. It's certainly a topic well-worth conversing about, but there's absolutely no value in doing so unless Obama's position is accurately represented. Unabashedly pro-choice? Yes. Supporting the "unlimited slaughter of children"? Not even close.