1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Obama warns Supreme Court

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by HankD, Apr 2, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,431
    Ratings:
    +1,327
    Faith:
    Baptist
  2. Don

    Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,676
    Ratings:
    +561
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I thought Obama was some kind of constitution professor? And he implies that the Supreme Court somehow doesn't have the authority to overturn federal laws?

    Wow.
     
  3. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,431
    Ratings:
    +1,327
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Constitution professor or not, apparently he has never heard of (or cares about) the separation of powers:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Constitution

    Four more years?

    HankD
     
  4. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,791
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    Faith:
    Baptist
  5. Don

    Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,676
    Ratings:
    +561
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm afraid, unfortunately, yes.
     
  6. billwald

    billwald New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,414
    Ratings:
    +0
    >Supreme Court somehow doesn't have the authority to overturn federal laws?

    Only by case law, not specifically stated in the Constitution. You all support a strict construction/interpretation of the Constitution, right? You all reject rule by case law, yes? There is historical precedent that the president can ignore the Supremes.
     
  7. Don

    Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    10,676
    Ratings:
    +561
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But that brings up an even stickier situation, doesn't it? What happens if the Supreme Court strikes it down, and the President ignores that and tries to enforce it? States then have legal precedent to refrain from complying ... which would necessarily lead to the President having to make a decision about how to deal with that state, or those states, that refuse to comply. And in an election year, no less.
     
  8. Jedi Knight

    Jedi Knight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    4,995
    Ratings:
    +168
    So that said, what would our founding fathers do about this?
     
  9. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,791
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    Faith:
    Baptist
    They would never have passed it in the first place.

    OTOH It's kind of like the tea tax. We know how that turned out.
     
    #9 carpro, Apr 2, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 2, 2012
  10. Arbo

    Arbo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Ratings:
    +1
    Could it be Obama sees a bit of writing on the wall, and is in spin mode?

    Wouldn't surprise me if something were leaked to him. After all Sotamayor (sp?) was one of his lackeys, and had a part in this law.
     
  11. Arbo

    Arbo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Ratings:
    +1
    Just saw a headline on Drudge asking if there was a leak.
     
  12. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    21,791
    Ratings:
    +1,288
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was Kagan, and she refuses to recuse herself. Dishonorable liberal idealogue till the end.
     
  13. Arbo

    Arbo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    3,942
    Ratings:
    +1
    Ah, you are right. I got the two mixed up in my precaffeinated state of mind.
     
  14. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    The only Supremes the President can ignore is the one that has Diana Ross. Ask Richard Nixon about ignoring Supreme Court rulings.
     
  15. revmwc

    revmwc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,039
    Ratings:
    +185
    Just looking back at the constitution and was wondering if violating the constitution on seperation of powers would today be comsidered a other high Crime or Misdemeanor worthy of impeachment and disqualification from office?
    I believe our forefathers would have thought so, but that doesn't mean today's lawmakers and justices would consider it to be.
     
  16. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    Republicans controlled the Senate when Clinton was impeached, and he was not convicted. It takes a two thirds vote in the Senate, and the Senate is Democratiic. I do think with the present House, articles of impeachment would be approved.
     
  17. Mexdeaf

    Mexdeaf New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,051
    Ratings:
    +0
    Obama's true colors are just coming out. He has to feel good about his chances with a weak Republican candidate to face in the general election. As he told the Russians, "I will have more freedom after the election."

    May God have mercy upon us all. We have reaped what we have sown by focusing on political solutions to everything at the expense of living, practicing and proclaiming the true Gospel.
     
  18. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    Please convey that to the 98% on this board who think electing Romney is the solution to Obama.
     
  19. revmwc

    revmwc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,039
    Ratings:
    +185
    I don't think anyone sees Romney as the soution to Obama, just the lesser and that aint much of two evils. UI still see Sanatorum haviong a chance, he is a little better, right now we have no viable candidate to win over Obama except Sanatorum. Romney is worse than McCain ever thought of being. G H W Bushh would be the best choice over any of these and he still not much of one. We haven't had a good choice since Reagan.
     
  20. saturneptune

    saturneptune New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    13,977
    Ratings:
    +0
    Thank you for that refreshing post which is light years in understanding ahead of those who belittle those of us who refuse to vote for someone with the character of Romney.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...