1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Preaching problem

Discussion in '2003 Archive' started by Askjo, Apr 29, 2003.

  1. Askjo

    Askjo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,736
    Ratings:
    +0
    [ May 09, 2003, 07:37 PM: Message edited by: Askjo ]
     
  2. Pastor Larry

    Pastor Larry <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    21,763
    Ratings:
    +0
    The point you should be making is that one of these men is wrong. This has nothign to do with the version they use. It has to do with their belief. Many oneness pentecostals use the KJV and support their doctrine from it. The reality is that the NIV is as clear, if not clearer, on the deity of Christ than the KJV is.

    Attack the problem: The doctrine of these men. Don't attack something that has nothing to do with the the problem.
     
  3. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    Pastor Larry is correct. It is reduction to the absurd to link MVs with liberal doctrine. Liberals used the KJV also.
     
  4. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,388
    Ratings:
    +180
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I concur with Tom and Larry. Though I recommend and promote the KJV, I must say that, if what I believe (in general) is the truth, then there is MUCH MORE false doctrine than true doctrine taught by people who use the KJV. Of course, the same would also be true concerning the NIV, NAS, etc.. The charge of false doctrine must be laid at the feet of those who teach it, and has little or nothing to do with which version they use.
     
  5. uhdum

    uhdum New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2001
    Messages:
    355
    Ratings:
    +0
    Agreed. It's not hard to find people who use the KJV that support baptismal regeneration, for example.

    The fault lies in their beliefs, not the version.
     
  6. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    Having said all that, a version may add to some confusion (KJV in Acts is misused by second Holy Spirit baptism folks, for example). But the conscientious Bible student will dig enough to evade these pitfalls.
     
  7. rlvaughn

    rlvaughn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2001
    Messages:
    5,388
    Ratings:
    +180
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But incidents of confusion are not limited to one version.
     
  8. HankD

    HankD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2001
    Messages:
    16,411
    Ratings:
    +1,321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints uses the KJV exclusively and they do not support the orthodox definition of the Trinity.

    HankD
     
  9. TomVols

    TomVols New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2000
    Messages:
    11,170
    Ratings:
    +0
    But incidents of confusion are not limited to one version. </font>[/QUOTE]I wasn't trying to imply that they were. [​IMG]
     
  10. Bugman

    Bugman New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    329
    Ratings:
    +0
    "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints uses the KJV exclusively and they do not support the orthodox definition of the Trinity."

    So did the JWs until they created their own version.

    Bryan
     
Loading...