Remaining Roman Catholic

I have never made personal insults to anyone. They do get offended and feel insulted when their doctrines are said to be false. As you can see, the Catholic biblical stance that they have the say on biblical doctrine as being based on Luke 10 is so far out of context it is ridiculous. Yet they still repeat it bc they blindly follow the RCC.

 

Whether or not it was a WELS or LCMS church, they are teaching error.

The Lutheran doctrine teaches consubstantiation.

 

Many Lutherans would object to the term 'consubstantiation' as not adequately reflecting their beliefs, but all would accept the belief in the Real Presence. So do I and so did the Early Church.

 

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02258b.htm

" In like manner they consider as probably valid the baptism of an infant in its mother's womb, provided the water, by means of an instrument, would actually flow upon the child. Such baptism is, however, later to be repeated conditionally, if the child survives its birth (Lehmkuhl, n. 61)."


"...while baptism can be bestowed upon infants immediately after they are born, and in case of necessity even in their mother's womb."

I chose to believe the most practical "instrument" refereed to above to be a syringe. Both men I referred to in my previous post said the baptismal kit in the Catholic hospital contained a syringe to be used in the baptismal process.

I have no motive to lie about what I heard and what is documented in other sources.

 

It's tantamount.

Kunundrums
It's conundrums.

 

I clicked on the address but it won't take me there, so I then went to the address bar and the 404 error came up and said not found.

 

Thanks for letting me know. Once you are on this site, do a find on "womb" to locate the quoted text.

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Baptism

 

Okay, I found it. Seems to me that this is a theological exercise - it probably never has happened ever and I have never heard of such thing myself.