Its "thinketh"Perhaps it all about how the man thinks... as a man thinkith.
Proverbs 23:7 For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Its "thinketh"Perhaps it all about how the man thinks... as a man thinkith.
Well whenever full preterism is brought forth an array of questions also comes forth Tom.Oh good grief, Hank. Paul asked the question. I just quoted him. Is he also clouds without rain?
I don't remember saying the Jews are in charge of any thing. I was speaking of Christ second coming.No, YOU'RE confused if you think this coming hasn't occurred yet:
40 When therefore the lord of the vineyard shall come, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those miserable men, and will let out the vineyard unto other husbandmen, who shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, The same was made the head of the corner; This was from the Lord, And it is marvelous in our eyes?
43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken away from you, and shall be given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And he that falleth on this stone shall be broken to pieces: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will scatter him as dust.
45 And when the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them. Mt 21
You're REALLY confused if you think the Jews are still in charge of the vineyard.
Well whenever full preterism is brought forth an array of questions also comes forth Tom.
One question brought forth if what is the source of horrific crime e.g. baby murder and why if all is fulfilled does God allow the bloodshed of the innocent if Satan is in the bottomless pit?
Weak, weak response, Tom, nonetheless a response.For one thing, I do not believe all is fulfilled.
1. It is given unto men once to die and then the judgment. Still future since we are still alive. But this is individual judgment as we meet God, each in our own time.
2. What the Seven Thunders uttered may be yet future. I don't know.
But just because a position does not answer all questions - or brings up other questions - does not invalidate the position.
We all have questions we cannot answer:
How can God create ex nihilo?
How is the Trinity even possible?
How can God die on the Christ and yet be in Heaven?
How does a seed become a mighty tree?
Electricity?
Etcetera....
I would rather have questions I cannot answer than answers I cannot question.
Partial Preterists also still look for the events that Tom mentioned.Weak, weak response, Tom, nonetheless a response.
Interesting though - a possible preterist futurist (or is it a possible futurist preterist?).
Weak, weak response, Tom, nonetheless a response.
Interesting though - a possible preterist futurist (or is it a possible futurist preterist?).
Most involved in this blog would say the same of your view Tom - many many passages which are counter preterist.I would rather hold a position that seems to go against what my eyes see than hold on to a position (my former futurism) that runs counter to so many Bible passages.
I don't remember saying the Jews are in charge of any thing. I was speaking of Christ second coming.
MB
Most involved in this blog would say the same of your view Tom - many many passages which are counter preterist.
e.g. (just one of MANY):
2 Peter 3
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
The record of which cannot be found in secular or church history.
personally I am looking forward to this earth being purged/renovated by the Lord's thermonuclear fusion
13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
How in one's wildest imagination can one think that these things have happened without allegorizing the scripture to make it agree with ones private view? Especially to believe that righteousness dwells here in this WICKED EARTH!?
However I admire your persistence and gentlemanly manner brother.
Who caresIts "thinketh"
Proverbs 23:7 For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he: Eat and drink, saith he to thee; but his heart is not with thee.
I do.Who cares
I don’tI do.
Ohhhhh please, spare me the condescendingGreat last line. That is the way we all should be.
OKI don’t
Most involved in this blog would say the same of your view Tom - many many passages which are counter preterist.
e.g. (just one of MANY):
2 Peter 3
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
The record of which cannot be found in secular or church history.
personally I am looking forward to this earth being purged/renovated by the Lord's thermonuclear fusion
13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
How in one's wildest imagination can one think that these things have happened without allegorizing the scripture to make it agree with ones private view? Especially to believe that righteousness dwells here in this WICKED EARTH!?
However I admire your persistence and gentlemanly manner brother.
Just being honest Tom.Thank you.
Unless you can recognize that Peter is indeed writing here in apocalyptical and metaphorical language it will be useless for me to continue. You don't need 'wildest imagination". You need a foundational knowledge of the Old Testament. You need especially, in Peter's case an understand how several times he draws from Isaiah. It is there you will find just what is meant by the "Heavens and Earth" that God created - well after the literal creation.
And, yes, righteousness does dwell with evil. "They shall not hurt on my holy mountain", the lion and lamb lying down together, the child not being hurt by the asp. These are all, once again, from Isaiah.
And the "elements" are not the physical elements we find in the periodic table. In the seven usages of that word it never clearly refers to that. It always refers to something intangible, basic tenets of a belief system. Three uses in the NT.
1. Basic tenets of the Jewish covenant (2 Peter, Galatians)
2. Basic tenets of Pagan religion (Galatians)
3. Basic foundational tenets of Christianity (Hebrews)
The elements are not physical elements. What elements did they even know back then? Earth, water, wind, and fire? Will fire melt into fire?
"But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how can you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles of the world, whose slaves you want to be once more? You observe days and months and seasons and years!" Gal. 4: 9-10
Paul wants them to leave the "elements" behind. He is not asking for their annihilation.
The constant struggle of preterism is to remind our futurists friends that the New Testament is deeply rooted in the oft-ignored Old Testament. A lack of knowledge of the Old translated to a lack of understanding of the New. And the style of the New Testament is not so radically different from the Old. Apocalyptic language, metaphors and, yes, allegory are often present. Paul even uses that word in Galatians.
To see all this you do not need wild imagination. You just need a well-bound Bible that has the last part connected to the foundational first.
He has gone on. I will see him again.As long as you write this I know that you have really processed what I wrote. Do you really believe nothing c
I am sorry to hear this, brother. But our experience does not give the final say on reality. The Bible does.
So sorry for your loss, but so glad you have the comfort of knowing that you will see him again.He has gone on. I will see him again.