1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Should FICA Income Limit be Raised/Removed?

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by InTheLight, Mar 24, 2014.

  1. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Unfortunately, the stupider the idea the more likely Washington is to do it!:BangHead:
     
  2. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    For that accurate assessment of what Social Security really is, you get a

    [​IMG]

    That was a popular saying in this part of the Midwest when I was growing up. And what, you say, is the significance of a Whizzo button?
    Well, it was shorter than now for sure, but it wasn't really less than age 62. Depended on race. Life Expectancy at Birth by Race and Sex, 1930–2010
     
    #22 thisnumbersdisconnected, Mar 28, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 28, 2014
  3. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    22,016
    Likes Received:
    487
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My point is, it was never meant to be returned. People would be dead before the benefits gave back, at age 65, I believe.
     
  4. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,982
    Likes Received:
    2,615
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Exactly, but here is an interesting story:
     
  5. North Carolina Tentmaker

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    So the logical fix would then be to raise the eligibility age. Why is that so hard?
     
  6. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    No, "logical" is turning the system into a semi-private investment program, not letting the government have 100% of the money and 100% control.
     
  7. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Uh, already been done. H.R. 1900, Public Law 98-21 passed in 1983 raises the age at which you can receive full SS benefits. It used to be 65. Now it goes up starting with those born in 1938 and maxing out at 67 for those born after 1960.
     
  8. North Carolina Tentmaker

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yes it has been raised to 67 (for me, I was born after 1960), but if the average livespan has increased more than two years since the program started then why has not the retirment age been adjusted accordingly?

    Well I guess the answer is simple, Lots of people who want to collect.

    TND, a private investment strategy is of course a much better idea, but that was never what SS was set up to be. It was never your money you put in that you were going to get back. Your money went to pay retires who were drawing when you were working.

    Adding disability and others who draw early and don't contribute has certainly made the situation worse. Shrinking population of workers vs retires is the biggest problem. One thing that seems obvious, it can't continue like it is going.
     
Loading...