1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured So what is 'preservation'?

Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by Wally, Mar 23, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Wally

    Wally Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    14
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So what you are saying by 'close enough' is that the differences are not significant. Hypothetical example: My dog jumped the fence vs. my dog 'joe' jumped over the fence. That doesn't change anything so if I picked one of those and decided that was the 'true' version, being wrong wouldn't 'hurt' anything. Is that approximately what you are saying?

    I'm not sure I agree with that, but that isn't a pre-requisite for responses :).

    It seems to me that there are theological differences that come from these differences. If not based on them, at least strengthened by them.
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Its more like translating that we are saved by Lord Jesus, By Jesus Christ, or by Jesus the Lord same Person all 3 ways!
     
  3. Wally

    Wally Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    14
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Fair enough. We can always agree to disagree with the significance of the differences.

    Actually I guess I would have a hard time agreeing or disagreeing since I don't read Greek or Hebrew. Do I have to learn the ancient languages in order to 'know' anything? There are literally thousands. Would I need to read them all to know that the differences aren't significant?

    I know you said that the English translations that are based on the original are valid as well, but that can't possibly be inclusive of ALL translations. There are some really bad ones. How/where would I draw that line if I can't read the texts that they are based on?
     
    • Useful Useful x 1
  4. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Let me add to my previous post by saying, all of the miracles of the Bible were observable. If a manuscript or a translation were to be preserved miraculously, the miracle would be observed. Yet I have never heard of, read of, or heard anyone discuss a case of miraculous preservation.

    On the other hand, providence takes time, being a process by its very definition. This fits the process of earthly preservation.
     
  5. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    There is NO agreed upon TR/nor which version of the Kjv accepted as being the correct"perfect" one though!
     
  6. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    th
    Checkthe translator teams viewpoints in regards to the scriptures, as looking for holding to Verbal plenary inspiration of the Originals, and holding to the Fundamentals of the faith!
     
  7. Wally

    Wally Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    14
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ummmm...what now?
     
  8. Dave G

    Dave G Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2018
    Messages:
    5,849
    Likes Received:
    1,332
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Providentially, with God using men to preserve His words.
    Teach them the Scriptures.
    I believe I gave some in a prior post...

    God preserves His word for each generation.
    DA Waite's book doesn't have anything to say about it?
    I was under the impression that it did.

    Perhaps I'm wrong and my reading of the Scriptures alone is where I get the support for this.
    Psalms 12:6-7.
    Trust the Lord to show you, John.
    He is, after all, a miracle worker.;)

    Plus, He is pleased to work through His saints ( Philippians 2:13 ).
    I agree.
    They have been preserved down through the ages, and I believe miraculously and observably.

    Whereas the writings of men are often lost to time, God's word has always stood the test of time by being preserved through His saints and through other means.
    Again, I seem to differ with you on what exactly preservation is.
    To me, God can and does preserve His words for His people to take comfort in and to study.

    Men ultimately being trustworthy ( Psalms 118:8, Psalms 146:3 ), it takes the power of God to influence men to keep His words intact.
    Just like the Lord withheld Abimelech from sinning in Genesis 20:6, and just like He will put it in the hearts of 10 kings to fulfill His will and to give their power to the "beast" in Revelation 17:17, the Lord can and does use even unbelievers to do His will.

    That, good sir, is the miracle.:)
     
    #48 Dave G, Mar 24, 2020
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2020
  9. Conan

    Conan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2019
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    314
    Faith:
    Baptist
  10. Dave G

    Dave G Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2018
    Messages:
    5,849
    Likes Received:
    1,332
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Should have said "untrustworthy", there.
     
  11. MartyF

    MartyF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    194
    Faith:
    Baptist
    What Bible passage are you referring to?
     
  12. Wally

    Wally Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    14
    Faith:
    Baptist
    For which?
     
  13. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,349
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You can't have it both ways. Either it is a miracle or it is providential. These are two different ways in which God works. God does not work "providentially through a miracle."

    Romans 8:28 is not referring to a miracle.

    You are missing my point and not answering my question. I'll try to be more clear--or maybe just blunt.

    If God preserves His Word through a miracle, what shall I tell my students about how that miracle occurs? I teach "Beginning Greek" and "Bible Translation Theory and Practice" right now. Can I tell them, "Forget all the hard work of translation for many years, God will give you a translation by a miracle"?

    Which book by Waite? He's written a bunch of them.

    Well, of course I believe this passage. How does this passage help me as a Bible translator, though? Let's get practical. Let's say I am translating John's gospel into Labu, a PNG language with not a single verse of Scripture, but believers who want to help. It would be great if I didn't have to take ten years to translate the NT. How can I get a miracle and get that Bible to them right away?

    This is not an answer. You are avoiding the question.

    God working through His saints is what I call human preservation. God has committed the earthly preservation of Scripture into the hands of His saints, it is true. We are the priests of the church age, and in the Jewish economy God committed the keeping of the law into the hands of the priests of Israel. Likewise, we saints are to preserve the Word of God. We do that through Bible translation, reading, studying, teaching, memorizing, printing, etc.

    Please give me an example from church history of miraculous preservation of the Scriptures (as opposed to providential preservation). Otherwise you are avoiding the question. If a miracle of preservation is observable, then someone observed it. Who? Jerome? No. Ulphilas? No. Erasmus? No. Luther? No, William Carey? No.

    So who, and when?

    I can agree with all of this.

    I think at this point you need to define "miracle." You appear to be equating "miracle" and "providence" as synonyms, and they most certainly are not.
     
    #53 John of Japan, Mar 25, 2020
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2020
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Wally

    Wally Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2020
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    14
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I don’t normally interject into conversations, and have avoided this very ‘off topic’ discussion on this thread. However, I am intrigued enough by it that I would like some clarification, as long as it appears you all are going to continue it anyway.

    You said “all of the miracles of the Bible were observable”. I don’t really understand that statement. There were many miracles described and I would take your word for it if your comment is entirely in relation to those, but there are also “many” miracles referenced without any specifics as to their observe-ability. On its face I would call your line of reasoning an ‘if/then’ fallacy but maybe you are setting this up for something more in depth…? Possibly waiting for that definition you have been asking for?

    Maybe if I bite you will be able to make your point: Most (including myself) would consider personal salvation a miracle. Using that as a reference, it isn’t observable by anything other than the results. That would seem to match a miracle of ‘preservation’…?
     
  15. MartyF

    MartyF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2018
    Messages:
    1,381
    Likes Received:
    194
    Faith:
    Baptist
     
  16. Logos1560

    Logos1560 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,204
    Likes Received:
    405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You may believe it, but it does not make it true. Your claim is contrary to known, verifiable facts. The fact of many actual variations and differences in the Greek NT manuscripts used in the making of the TR conflicts with your claim. The printed TR editions do not follow word-for-word perfectly the text of any one Greek NT manuscript.

    If there are supposedly any 100% absolutely perfect, complete original-language manuscript copies of Scripture, they have not been identified.

    It is a known, verifiable fact that the Greek NT manuscript copies used by Erasmus for his edited, printed NT edition of the Textus Receptus were not perfectly nor miraculously copied. Those Greek manuscript copies still exist with actual copying errors indicated by all the changes and revisions that Erasmus and his helpers wrote on them. Erasmus did not even correct all the copying errors in those Greek manuscripts since the later TR editors Stephanus and Beza corrected some more. Erasmus translated from the Latin Vulgate some additions that he wrote on the manuscript copies that he wanted the printer to follow. Erasmus also introduced some conjectures, not found in his manuscripts, into his printed text. Are you unaware of the fact that the Greek manuscripts used by Erasmus for his first two editions did not have some whole verses that were added in later TR editions?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I will retranslate!
    Check the views of the translation committee in regards to how they viewed the Originals, if they were seen as being Verbal Plenary inspired or not, and if they also held to all of the Fundamentals of the Faith!
    Check both yes, and will have a reliable translation!
     
  18. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Was God preserving ot before the TR and the Kjv, as in the Vulgate, and Bishop, and Geneva bibles then?
     
  19. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Don't KJVO though see the 1611 translators as having the miracle of divine inspiration upon their work, in the process of translating and in finished work?
     
  20. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Does not sound that he was being inspired in same sense Apostles were in writing their books, neither were the 1611 team, as they also were making amendments and additions and using variants in their decision making process!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...