1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Social services remove young children from grandparents and arrange adoption by gay c

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by Revmitchell, Jan 29, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,148
    Ratings:
    +2,369
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister were being looked after by their grandparents because their mother, a recovering drug addict, was not considered capable.

    But social workers stepped in after allegedly deciding that the couple, who are aged 59 and 46, were "too old" to look after the children.

    They were allegedly stripped of their carer's rights and informed they would be barred from seeing the children altogether unless they agreed to the same-sex adoption.


    More Here
     
  2. Jon-Marc

    Jon-Marc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    2,752
    Ratings:
    +0
    Isn't there some legal action the grandparents can take? 59 and 46 are considered too old to care for children? What about parents who are that old or older? That is a real injustice and needs to be corrected. A homosexual couple is better than loving grandparents? Think of the confusion that will result in those children being raised that way. They will more than likely grow up thinking that same sex couples is normal.
     
  3. Revmitchell

    Revmitchell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    39,148
    Ratings:
    +2,369
    Faith:
    Baptist

    And that is the agenda:


     
  4. windcatcher

    windcatcher New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,764
    Ratings:
    +0
    This happened in the UK, in Edenberg.

    This is social engineering, brought to you by social workers, some (mind .....not all) who are activist with their own agenda. Where is the state? Where are the courts? Where is the respect for and contiuity of family? Some children grow up in homes with both parents young and disabled in some way..... but well adjusted. How sad. Pray for the children.... and their grandparents!
     
  5. donnA

    donnA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Ratings:
    +0
    How stupid
     
  6. Magnetic Poles

    Magnetic Poles New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    10,407
    Ratings:
    +0
    If the facts of the story are as presented, this is disgusting that two loving grandparents can't keep the kids.
     
  7. Matt Black

    Matt Black Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,147
    Ratings:
    +1
    Some flesh on the bones of the story:

    1. Both grandparents despite their relative youth have health issues which would ordinarily render them unsuitable for adoption under the normal UK criteria

    2. The (single) mother of the children is a recovering heroin addict and is currently on methadone. It's generally considered unwise and unsafe to have a methadone addict around children (hence the original need for fostering or adoption) but the grandparents refused to give social services an undertaking that they would bar their daughter from access to the kids until she was off the methadone.

    All of that said, I still think this case is a crying shame and a travesty and the social services should have come up with a better solution, but I just thought we ought to have a bit of context to the case.
     
  8. donnA

    donnA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Ratings:
    +0
    Normally grandparents are not denied custody if the parents as long as they themselves do not past chrges of sex crimes. Grandparents are usually more preferable to non family members.
     
  9. Bro. Curtis

    Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    20,297
    Ratings:
    +35
    I do think the bio parent & grandparents should have some say in who does get the children, but only after it's proved they would be at risk by NOT being removed from the home.
     
  10. Aaron

    Aaron Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,867
    Ratings:
    +603
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not so mention the risk of sexual assault.
     
  11. Matt Black

    Matt Black Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,147
    Ratings:
    +1
    Sorry, are you seriously falling for the delusion that 'homosexual'='paedophile'?
     
  12. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Ratings:
    +0
    Well, I believe that this "delusion" is far more likely with gay adopters, than straight grandparents... And, it is not delusional at all, but a reasonable conclusion, or at least a reasonable caution to take.. I don't like gay people in control of children in any situation, if possible..
     
  13. donnA

    donnA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2000
    Messages:
    23,354
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't think all homosexuals are pedophiles. I think just as many heterosexuals are pedophiles as homosexuals.
    I do not think homosexuals should be able to adopt because they can not provide a family environment for children to grow up in, theres no mother in the picture, children need a mother. Mothers are not obsolete and never will be.
     
  14. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Ratings:
    +0
    IMO, no child should be raised in a home where homosexual relationships prevail... It should be considered child abuse. Amazing to me how this lifestyle has gained a measure of acceptance even in the church..
     
  15. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Ratings:
    +0
    Sorry to belabor this but: I know you would find an enormously higher percentage of pedophiles there than in straight society..... Enough so that I believe it should justify keeping children out of those households.... K, I'm done...
     
  16. Aaron

    Aaron Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,867
    Ratings:
    +603
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Homosexual = sexual deviant, someone whose lusts are perverted beyond their natural scope. Children are at a much higher risk for abuse in Sodom than in other situations.
     
  17. Matt Black

    Matt Black Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,147
    Ratings:
    +1
    I agree that both are perversions, but the evidence that the two are otherwise connected does not bear out your theory.
     
  18. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Ratings:
    +0
    Then the evidence has been tampered with... IMO..
    So, in your opinion, if something should happen in your family where children or grandchildren had to be placed by Children Services, you'd not care with whom they were placed? I know you're not saying that, but it begs that question.
     
  19. Matt Black

    Matt Black Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,147
    Ratings:
    +1
    No, I wouldn't want my children to go to a same-sex couple, but that's because I disapprove of their lifestyle and I wouldn't want my children raised in that environment, not because I think they would be any more likely to abuse my children than a straight couple.
     
  20. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hmm, well I guess we'll simply disagree on this... rather largely on my part.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...